| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Cryoma Member of the Year
Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1819
|
Posted: Wed Jul 21, 2010 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Sephiron wrote: | | God damot. I know this is sort of off-topic, but I have an AMD athlon desktop with 1.80 GHZ clock speed, 2 GB of DDR ram. Would you consider that decent or shit? |
In between.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hero I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 7154
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sephiron wrote: | | God damot. I know this is sort of off-topic, but I have an AMD athlon desktop with 1.80 GHZ clock speed, 2 GB of DDR ram. Would you consider that decent or shit? | depends pn graphics, but no.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zcythe Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 679 Location: :noitacoL
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hero wrote: | | Zycthe wrote: | | kls85 wrote: |
This has a 1.6GHz cpu and why is this not "ancient"? |
Because apparently to them an Intel quad core is better than an AMD quad core. lol | I would think an i7 performance with a 1.6 clock is better than a P II x4 at 1.6ghz. If you think the clock speed makes the performance than you are kind of dumb. |
No need for insults I know they clock differently but I'm just saying it cant be that much of a performance difference and worth the money I7 is more powerful but for a money saving option AMD has always been cheaper in terms of price.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hero I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 7154
|
Posted: Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Zycthe wrote: | | Hero wrote: | | Zycthe wrote: | | kls85 wrote: |
This has a 1.6GHz cpu and why is this not "ancient"? |
Because apparently to them an Intel quad core is better than an AMD quad core. lol | I would think an i7 performance with a 1.6 clock is better than a P II x4 at 1.6ghz. If you think the clock speed makes the performance than you are kind of dumb. |
No need for insults I know they clock differently but I'm just saying it cant be that much of a performance difference and worth the money I7 is more powerful but for a money saving option AMD has always been cheaper in terms of price. | Its not an insult. It was not directed at anyone in particular. Its an honest fact that performance is not controled by the clock of a cpu.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sephiron's system is outdated and obsolete by today's standards.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hero I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 7154
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sephiron Master Cheater
Reputation: 34
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 292 Location: JAPAN circa 1653, fucking some seagulls
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kls85 wrote: | | Sephiron's system is outdated and obsolete by today's standards. |
Well, my mom was willing to buy me a new computer for my birthday like a year ago, but the budget was only around 300 bucks. The best I could get was my computer for $315.00. It came with windows 7 ultimate, above specs, a hardrive with an insane rpm, 9 usb ports and a disc reader/writer. It's also completely silent and it about the size of a large laptop. You have to admit, it's a pretty good deal for $315.00
_________________
| Nirojan wrote: | | picked up 1,.5 g and them budduty picled up quarter o today we blase all of |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Selrahc Master Cheater
Reputation: 27
Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 279 Location: New York
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kls85 wrote: | | Sephiron's system is outdated and obsolete by today's standards. |
Any computer you or anyone else bought yesterday is obsolete by todays standards.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: | | kls85 wrote: | | Sephiron's system is outdated and obsolete by today's standards. |
Any computer you or anyone else bought yesterday is obsolete by todays standards. |
Stupid fag, if you can't post anything productive, then don't post at all.
Your idiotic comment is the epicenter of retardness and how the hell you're bought into this world is still a mystery.
To OP:
For a portable performance notebook, you can check out the Alienware MX11x
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Farr. Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 749
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| unbelievable, $849.99 for 1.6 GHz processor... I bought my laptop 4 years ago and it was 1.7 GHz.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Selrahc Master Cheater
Reputation: 27
Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 279 Location: New York
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kls85 wrote: | | Chaz wrote: | | kls85 wrote: | | Sephiron's system is outdated and obsolete by today's standards. |
Any computer you or anyone else bought yesterday is obsolete by todays standards. |
Stupid fag, if you can't post anything productive, then don't post at all.
Your idiotic comment is the epicenter of retardness and how the hell you're bought into this world is still a mystery.
To OP:
For a portable performance notebook, you can check out the Alienware MX11x |
lol, umad? Alienware is overpriced shit.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Farr. wrote: | | unbelievable, $849.99 for 1.6 GHz processor... I bought my laptop 4 years ago and it was 1.7 GHz. |
These are mobile quad cores.
And with today's demanding price where consumers want to get things cheap, they're force to go with the slowest piece.
Core i7 quad core for notebooks/Pricing in 1K units.
Which means companies need to buy 1000 pieces of those CPU if they want to get that price.
-Core i7 720QM @ 1.60GHz/TbM: 2.80GHz $364.00
-Core i7 740QM @ 1.73GHz/TbM: 2.93GHz $378.00
-Core i7 820QM @ 1.73GHz/TbM: 3.06GHz $546.00
-Core i7 840QM @ 1.86GHz/TbM: 3.20GHz $568.00
-Core i7 920XM @ 2.00GHz/TbM: 3.20GHz $1054.00
-Core i7 940XM @ 2.13GHz/TbM: 3.33GHz $1096.00
TbM= Turbo Mode
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hero I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 7154
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Farr. wrote: | | unbelievable, $849.99 for 1.6 GHz processor... I bought my laptop 4 years ago and it was 1.7 GHz. | A laptop with a quad only needs 1.6ghz. Most of them also OC easily and have turbo.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fafaffy Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 12 Dec 2007 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
WTF happened to this page, like code ALL Around it. XSS'ed?
_________________
| Brillia wrote: | | I FUCKING FUCK SEX |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hero I'm a spammer
Reputation: 79
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 7154
|
Posted: Fri Jul 23, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| applanet wrote: | | WTF happened to this page, like code ALL Around it. XSS'ed? | Idk, its happening on all pages. ANYWAY, laptops do not need high clocked cpus, even for gaming.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|