| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
grimmyx Newbie cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Imo, the GTX 295 is a waste of money. I would SLI 2 GTX 260s or maybe even 2 GTX 275s. You can save anywhere from $100-$200 that way.
Also, this is just speculation, but I doubt that you need another 6gb of ram. Unless you're doing video editing or something you shouldn't even need anywhere near 6gb.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ndure Master Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 317
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 4:36 pm Post subject: Re: Prebuild |
|
|
You should have about 10$ leftover.
As for the extra HDD, I don't see what you'll need it for unless you're dual/triple booting. But even then, 1TB is alot.
For the extra GPU, no, it won't be worth it because it'll only be running at 4x speed if you put it in tri-sli with this mobo.
Another 6GB of RAM? No unless you're hosting a server. Otherwise 6GB is more than enough.
Last edited by Ndure on Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:15 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Humper Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 1545
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
2x GTX 260 is btr then one GTX 295.
Because:
- Its colder
- Its btr preformance
- Quiter
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DamiPL Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 02 Jul 2006 Posts: 1195 Location: 11001110
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
he said that hes getting a second GPU when he has $, so i think he should get that GTX 295 and then get a second one.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zarr Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 915 Location: localhost
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DAMIPL wrote: | | he said that hes getting a second GPU when he has $, so i think he should get that GTX 295 and then get a second one. |
2x GTX 260s will play anything at uber high settings. Can't see why anyone'd need 2x GTX295s.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DamiPL Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 02 Jul 2006 Posts: 1195 Location: 11001110
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thats true, but one GTX 295 should be able to play anything aswell, and when newer games come out, he can just get a 2nd 295 instead of 2 new other ones. But that would take some time lols so i guess either choice is fine. Im planing to get 2x 260s as well so i guess ur right.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Humper Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 1545
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DAMIPL wrote: | | thats true, but one GTX 295 should be able to play anything aswell, and when newer games come out, he can just get a 2nd 295 instead of 2 new other ones. But that would take some time lols so i guess either choice is fine. Im planing to get 2x 260s as well so i guess ur right. |
No sorry thats not possible to get good preformance.
2x 295 = Quad SLI
First of all anything with quad gives horrible preformance.
Same for tri cores.
This is only for videocards tho.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ndure Master Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 317
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DAMIPL wrote: | | thats true, but one GTX 295 should be able to play anything aswell, and when newer games come out, he can just get a 2nd 295 instead of 2 new other ones. But that would take some time lols so i guess either choice is fine. Im planing to get 2x 260s as well so i guess ur right. |
2x 295? Are you kidding me?
& That would mean quad-sli as humper said because 295 = 280x2
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DamiPL Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 02 Jul 2006 Posts: 1195 Location: 11001110
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ndure wrote: |
2x 295? Are you kidding me?
& That would mean quad-sli as humper said because 295 = 280x2 |
You say "295 = 280x2" so that means 1x295 is still better than 2x260..
and srry Humper didint know that 2x295 wouldint work or give good pref. but oh well then get 2x 260 then=cheaper.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ndure Master Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 317
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DAMIPL wrote: | | Ndure wrote: |
2x 295? Are you kidding me?
& That would mean quad-sli as humper said because 295 = 280x2 |
You say "295 = 280x2" so that means 1x295 is still better than 2x260..
and srry Humper didint know that 2x295 wouldint work or give good pref. but oh well then get 2x 260 then=cheaper. |
I didn't say it's faster. Yes 295 is two 280 cores in one card.
I was just saying that 295 in SLI would be totally overkill, I have a single 295 and it's waaaay more than enough.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg I'm a spammer
Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 5801
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Humper wrote: | | DAMIPL wrote: | | thats true, but one GTX 295 should be able to play anything aswell, and when newer games come out, he can just get a 2nd 295 instead of 2 new other ones. But that would take some time lols so i guess either choice is fine. Im planing to get 2x 260s as well so i guess ur right. |
No sorry thats not possible to get good preformance.
2x 295 = Quad SLI
First of all anything with quad gives horrible preformance.
Same for tri cores.
This is only for videocards tho. |
Horrible performance?
No, the performance gain is very real... too bad the scaling isn't linear. If the game isn't hilariously GPU bound, maybe you'd go down a little from the driver overhead.
And how does tri-core magically make performance shit? (it doesn't)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aasddsaadsasdasdasdassads Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 28 Aug 2008 Posts: 161 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 4:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Hey, maybe you could try cutting down the cost of you chassis, could get one below 100US. Unless you do serious overclocking (every day), it is not really nessesary.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|