 |
Cheat Engine The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chaos Lord Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Isn't as stable? What do you mean?
| Zarr wrote: | | Chaos Lord wrote: | | Vista is a much stronger OS compared to XP, but yes, it's not suitable for slow computers and DX10 does slow you down by a bit. |
Resource using? Yes. Stronger? No. Yes, Vista looks good, but that's about it. DX10 is far slower than DX9 (though that may just be because of the games, not DX10 itself). Vista uses at least twice the RAM of XP, leaving much more for other programs; Vista is more taxing on the video card; Vista is more taxing on the CPU; I could go on and on. I'll admit, Vista, at release, was much better than XP, at release, but, with SP2, XP is still a lot better.
Maybe I'll think Vista is the better operating system after a few service packs are released, but, at the time being, XP is, still, the better operating system.
To the thread starter: don't use Vista, yet. Wait until a few service packs are released. Vista uses too much resources and isn't as stable as XP, for the time being.
A semi-related article that might be somewhat interesting to read: Link. |
With 2gb RAM, who cares if Vista uses only twice as much?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zarr Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Jan 2008 Posts: 915 Location: localhost
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chaos Lord wrote: | Isn't as stable? What do you mean?
| Zarr wrote: | | Long-assed quote. |
With 2gb RAM, who cares if Vista uses only twice as much? |
I'm saying, at the moment, it's more prone to crashing. The stability issues should probably be fixed with a few service packs.
In my opinion, Windows needs to be rebuilt from the ground up, so anything new that's not been completely re-written, by Microsoft, I'm against. I just feel XP doesn't have as much needless crap as Vista.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg I'm a spammer
Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 5801
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Zarr wrote: | | Chaos Lord wrote: | Isn't as stable? What do you mean?
| Zarr wrote: | | Long-assed quote. |
With 2gb RAM, who cares if Vista uses only twice as much? |
I'm saying, at the moment, it's more prone to crashing. The stability issues should probably be fixed with a few service packs.
In my opinion, Windows needs to be rebuilt from the ground up, so anything new that's not been completely re-written, by Microsoft, I'm against. I just feel XP doesn't have as much needless crap as Vista. |
It's DESIGNED to use ram, it tries to very aggressively cache things and keep things in memory based on user patterns in order to speed things up.
It's the way it works in vista, it using ram is a GOOD thing, NOT bad. If something else needs the memory, it gets freed.
DX10 as an API is superior to DX9.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vincent. Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 16
Joined: 09 Nov 2007 Posts: 774
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks guys, i just stick with xp for a while, until vista gets better.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Missi0n Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 20 Jul 2007 Posts: 820 Location: Around
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
What, i get no free software through the post
_________________
☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭☭
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cokefag Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007 Posts: 488
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DO NOT
I REPEAT
DO NOT USE VISTA
ITS DOWNGRADING UR COMPTUER
OKAY EVEN WINDOWS98 > VISTA
the ONLY good thing Vista gives you
is the fact that u can scroll ur mouse over another task
and see it even if its a video / game
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lolwut94 Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 197
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chaos Lord wrote: | Isn't as stable? What do you mean?
| Zarr wrote: | | Chaos Lord wrote: | | Vista is a much stronger OS compared to XP, but yes, it's not suitable for slow computers and DX10 does slow you down by a bit. |
Resource using? Yes. Stronger? No. Yes, Vista looks good, but that's about it. DX10 is far slower than DX9 (though that may just be because of the games, not DX10 itself). Vista uses at least twice the RAM of XP, leaving much more for other programs; Vista is more taxing on the video card; Vista is more taxing on the CPU; I could go on and on. I'll admit, Vista, at release, was much better than XP, at release, but, with SP2, XP is still a lot better.
Maybe I'll think Vista is the better operating system after a few service packs are released, but, at the time being, XP is, still, the better operating system.
To the thread starter: don't use Vista, yet. Wait until a few service packs are released. Vista uses too much resources and isn't as stable as XP, for the time being.
A semi-related article that might be somewhat interesting to read: Link. |
With 2gb RAM, who cares if Vista uses only twice as much? |
I care. Because during my 6 months of using Vista, I monitored RAM usage. It kept going up and up and up until I clicked "optimize RAM Usage." Seriously now, I don't think it's worth clicking "optimize ram" every 20 minutes. And the fact that everything is cached on RAM is just plain inefficient. It's causing the computer to run slower than normal. Caching just defeats the purpose.
Please explain how DX10's API is any better than DX9.
_________________
<font>test</font> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|