Cheat Engine

AtheistCrusader

here's a simple minesweeper trainer made with VB and this includes source to learn from.
Edit://now it has a module in it lol

the_undead · Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:05 am Post subject:

two words:

Its VB.

appalsap · Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:08 am Post subject:

I dont think you can use "learn" and "vb" in the same sentence unless they are seperated with "not", "never" or "no"

AtheistCrusader · Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 10:31 am Post subject:

the_undead · Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 11:19 am Post subject:

Labyrnth · Moderator Reputation: 10 Joined: 28 Nov 2006 Posts: 6301

Why are you guys bashing VB ?
VB doesn't teach bad habits. The coder does.

Many c++ programmers use VB for the database programming in there applications because it dominates in that field of programming.

We can go on and on how one is better then the other, But facts remain VB is Microsoft specific and will never be ported to other platforms thus will always be developed and will not leave you high and dry.
Now it is good to not just learn one language thats for sure. But i would not underestimate VB just because you think it is a language for beginners or something.

masterkert3:
Why not post that trainer in trainers section.
Also, the source is not complete, you did not include the module for it.
Just having the source from the forms is not helping anyone learn whats going on lol.

And they are right about looking at the source it is all jumbled he he.

the_undead · Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 11:51 am Post subject:

Labyrnth · Moderator Reputation: 10 Joined: 28 Nov 2006 Posts: 6301

Im referring to VB dominating C++ in database programming, I know you can data base program with java and several other languages.

The point being here is most people who sit and bash a language, dont use the language so they do not know what thy are talking about and go by hear say issues.
I used VB and C++ and i see the difference to some extent on what is better suited for the job.

Now to defend C++ in an issue, Is it is better suited to use assembly right in the source verse's Vb, because to do it in vb you would have to do a work around to import assembly in to the code to be used.

So this shit can go back and forth all day and to the end of time and never get anywheres. It is all preference mostly with just few facts in between on differences.

the_undead · Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:23 pm Post subject:

Oh... So I've never used VB then? I take it you know the rest of my life-history then?

I've used VB and a myriad of other language and from that, well, I'm pretty damn experienced to say that vb fails at pretending to be a language. Appalsap on the other-hand, appears to know what she's talking about.

Labyrnth · Moderator Reputation: 10 Joined: 28 Nov 2006 Posts: 6301

No im not saying you dont know anything about VB,
But i must have struck a nerve to get you all riled up?
Didnt mean to make you think i was directing that towards you. I wasnt.

The debates on this type of discussion is just not worth arguing about.
Only talk about know facts and no guess work about what works better then the other. First hand experience gives you the answers.
Im sure you have used VB or you would not even bee in the discussion.

the_undead · Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 2:05 pm Post subject:

Sorry, I mis-interpreted your post.

I say end this before it ends up in a pointless flame-match.

Labyrnth · Moderator Reputation: 10 Joined: 28 Nov 2006 Posts: 6301

Im with you ....... agreed.

cooldudedan · Cheater Reputation: 0 Joined: 13 Sep 2006 Posts: 30

The module is missing...

AtheistCrusader · Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:33 am Post subject:

ok lol yes i missed the module when i made the .rar so here it is