 |
Cheat Engine The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HackOtaku I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[a] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. |
Lmao Talix and his classic three page long posts. Einstein said if you can't explain something simply, you don't know it well enough.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finnegan waking up How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | Quote: | | For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[a] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. |
Lmao Talix and his classic three page long posts. Einstein said if you can't explain something simply, you don't know it well enough. |
so what did einstein say about being incapable of explaining anything at all?
i reposted what i posted before. clearly you've never read it, because i gave simple refutations to a lot of stuff.
(Exodus 8:10) there is no one like the Lord our God.
(Psalm 113:5) No one can compare with the LORD our God
(Deuteronomy 4:35) “that thou mightest know that the LORD he is God; there is none else beside Him.”
(Deuteronomy 4:39) “Yahweh, He is God in heaven above and on the earth below; there is no other.”
(Deuteronomy 32:39) “See now that I, I am He, And there is no god besides Me”
(Deuteronomy 6:4) “Hear, O Israel! Yahweh is our God, Yahweh is one [echad]!”
(2 Samuel 7:22) “You are great, O Lord God; for there is none like You, and there is no God besides You”
(2 Samuel 22:32) “For who is God, besides Yahweh? And who is a rock, besides our God?”
(1 Kings 8:60) “Yahweh is God; there is no one else.”
(2 Kings 19:15) “You are the God, You alone [bad], of all the kingdoms of the earth.”
(1 Chronicles 17:20) “O Lord, there is none like You, nor is there any God besides You”
(Nehemiah 9:6) “You alone [bad] are Yahweh.”
(Psalm 18:31) “For who is God, but Yahweh? And who is a rock, except our God”
(Isaiah 37:20) “You alone [bad], Lord, are God.”
(Isaiah 43:10) “Before Me there was no God formed, And there will be none after Me.”
why would God waste His time to keep telling us who He is, if He thinks we should not or can not understand that?
Don’t you understand "one"? "alone"? "only"? "No one else"?
every truthful person understands this-- unless the person wants to espouse Trinity, 3 persons 1 God, hypostatic union, eternally generated, 2 natures etc.-- which are man made and are not in the Bible.
do you believe what is in the Bible above or your believe that is not in the Bible?
Matthew 28:19 is a later interpolation. the earliest gospel, that of Mark, does not have Matthew’s baptismal formula, even in the extended ending.
so not only is the trinity not present in the Tanakh, but not even in the New Testament. it had to be developed and refined over hundreds of years until it was finally accepted in the Council of Constantinople in 381.
not even at the council of Nicea in 325 was it fully described and accepted. The holy spirit was added to the mix in 381 and that was the finalized version of the Nicene creed.
continue with your make-believe and hypocrisy
Last edited by finnegan waking up on Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:36 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HackOtaku I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm not going to read a novel. Condense it and try again
| Quote: | | continue with your make-believe and hypocrisy |
I intend to. The difference between us is that I am not offended by statements like this. They only highlight your ignorance. You might as well be trash talking the idea that 2+2=4 to me.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finnegan waking up How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | I'm not going to read a novel. Condense it and try again
| Quote: | | continue with your make-believe and hypocrisy |
I intend to. The difference between us is that I am not offended by statements like this. They only highlight your ignorance. You might as well be trash talking the idea that 2+2=4 to me. |
nope, the truth is right there and said in many ways, i covered various things you said across various topics. i broke many things up, it is actual intellectual laziness to act like this.
simply put, you can't defend your religion or the truth that has been presented.
if you even tried to present something in like manner, i would have had no reserves on refuting it.
you don't even try refuting it because you can't. you don't have the intellectual discipline or even knowledge to assess the subjects.
your behaviour has made it quite clear that no matter what is presented, you will only act childish.
there is no need to restate anything, because you'll just continue to dodge and run in your incompetence
you're the one who trash talks 2+2=4; you say 1+1+1=1
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HackOtaku I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sure sure, i'm incompetent, I only run, and yet you still try to preach Islam to me. What happened to "it doesnt befit the lion"? Do us both a favor and refrain from speaking to me.
I don't say 1+1+1=1, more childish understandings of the trinity.If you cannot understand books written for grown ups you shouldn't speak on it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finnegan waking up How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | Sure sure, i'm incompetent, I only run, and yet you still try to preach Islam to me. What happened to "it doesnt befit the lion"? Do us both a favor and refrain from speaking to me. |
nope, i will continue speaking the truth. object all you want.
i even made clear refutations, concise, and you just insult and run.
yes, you are incompetent. you have only shown this.
that's why you can't even comprehend my signature beyond trying to twist it into a childish insult. it'd be more direct for you to just spit at the moon, it results in the same for you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HackOtaku I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If you cannot understand books written for grown ups you shouldn't speak on it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finnegan waking up How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | If you cannot understand books written for grown ups you shouldn't speak on it. |
now you're getting it. no wonder you can't speak on what's said to you
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
To0k How do I cheat?
Reputation: 14
Joined: 16 Nov 2007 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | Sure sure, i'm incompetent, I only run, and yet you still try to preach Islam to me. What happened to "it doesnt befit the lion"? Do us both a favor and refrain from speaking to me.
I don't say 1+1+1=1, more childish understandings of the trinity.If you cannot understand books written for grown ups you shouldn't speak on it. | That lion part would only apply if one would actually be a lion, which talix is not.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | Quote: | | For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[a] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. |
Lmao Talix and his classic three page long posts. Einstein said if you can't explain something simply, you don't know it well enough. | Einstein did not actually say this. Einsteins theory's are way more complex than just the basic E=MC^2, he obviously would use as much explanation as necessary to describe his theories. Sometimes things are complex are require more explanation, it is not Talix's fault if you burden him with multiple questions in one sentence that require not only starting the explanation from the beginning (basically hes setting the context) but also to cite everything.
also Einstein was a dirty jew that stole a bunch of shit and shouldnt be praised as much as he is. he also married his first cousin and cheated on her, and denounced God before dying.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/13804030/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/new-letters-shed-light-einsteins-love-life/
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HackOtaku I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Brolock wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | Quote: | | For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[a] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. |
Lmao Talix and his classic three page long posts. Einstein said if you can't explain something simply, you don't know it well enough. | Einstein did not actually say this. Einsteins theory's are way more complex than just the basic E=MC^2, he obviously would use as much explanation as necessary to describe his theories. Sometimes things are complex are require more explanation, it is not Talix's fault if you burden him with multiple questions in one sentence that require not only starting the explanation from the beginning (basically hes setting the context) but also to cite everything.
also Einstein was a dirty jew that stole a bunch of shit and shouldnt be praised as much as he is. he also married his first cousin and cheated on her, and denounced God before dying.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/13804030/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/new-letters-shed-light-einsteins-love-life/ |
Except I didn't ask him multiple questions that require multiple answers, I told him repeatedly that I'm not interested, he is just posting copy pasta from another thread irrelevant to this thread. Pay attention, bozo.
As far as Einstein's concerned, even if that quote isn't his it still rings true.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 36
|
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2019 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | Quote: | | For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[a] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. |
Lmao Talix and his classic three page long posts. Einstein said if you can't explain something simply, you don't know it well enough. | Einstein did not actually say this. Einsteins theory's are way more complex than just the basic E=MC^2, he obviously would use as much explanation as necessary to describe his theories. Sometimes things are complex are require more explanation, it is not Talix's fault if you burden him with multiple questions in one sentence that require not only starting the explanation from the beginning (basically hes setting the context) but also to cite everything.
also Einstein was a dirty jew that stole a bunch of shit and shouldnt be praised as much as he is. he also married his first cousin and cheated on her, and denounced God before dying.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/13804030/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/new-letters-shed-light-einsteins-love-life/ |
Except I didn't ask him multiple questions that require multiple answers, I told him repeatedly that I'm not interested, he is just posting copy pasta from another thread irrelevant to this thread. Pay attention, bozo.
As far as Einstein's concerned, even if that quote isn't his it still rings true. | Clearly his "3 page post" was referencing other things you have said, in which it is multiple things (as he highlighted in >greentext), and clearly your response to him saying it must be simple was referring to those things, not to the previous discussion you were having. He responded to your 2 sentence post with only 3 sentences himself in the discussion you were previously having. It is clear you dont want to have this discussion, and that those long posts were another topic, but that doesnt excuse your dismissal of it being too complex and therefore untrue.
Like I said, there are some things that cannot be explained simply. And what does it mean to explain it simply? simply given the context, simply so that a layman can understand, or simply as in short and concise but may have to skip important details? I think its a terrible quote used for people to weasel their way out of learning something. Im not saying youre doing this, I dont care about you and talix's actual argument, and I know you are educating yourself regarding your new found Christianity. I just want to point out the quote isnt his and how its a dumb quote to use
heres a couple quotes by Feynman that make more sense and could contextually be more appropriate
"Hell, if I could explain it to the average person, it wouldn't have been worth the Nobel prize. "
"Once I asked him to explain to me, so that I can understand it, why spin-1/2 particles obey Fermi-Dirac statistics. Gauging his audience perfectly, he said, "I'll prepare a freshman lecture on it." But a few days later he came to me and said: "You know, I couldn't do it. I couldn't reduce it to the freshman level. That means we really don't understand it."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HackOtaku I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2019 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Brolock wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | Brolock wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | Quote: | | For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons,[a] neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord. |
Lmao Talix and his classic three page long posts. Einstein said if you can't explain something simply, you don't know it well enough. | Einstein did not actually say this. Einsteins theory's are way more complex than just the basic E=MC^2, he obviously would use as much explanation as necessary to describe his theories. Sometimes things are complex are require more explanation, it is not Talix's fault if you burden him with multiple questions in one sentence that require not only starting the explanation from the beginning (basically hes setting the context) but also to cite everything.
also Einstein was a dirty jew that stole a bunch of shit and shouldnt be praised as much as he is. he also married his first cousin and cheated on her, and denounced God before dying.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/13804030/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/new-letters-shed-light-einsteins-love-life/ |
Except I didn't ask him multiple questions that require multiple answers, I told him repeatedly that I'm not interested, he is just posting copy pasta from another thread irrelevant to this thread. Pay attention, bozo.
As far as Einstein's concerned, even if that quote isn't his it still rings true. | Clearly his "3 page post" was referencing other things you have said, in which it is multiple things (as he highlighted in >greentext), and clearly your response to him saying it must be simple was referring to those things, not to the previous discussion you were having. He responded to your 2 sentence post with only 3 sentences himself in the discussion you were previously having. It is clear you dont want to have this discussion, and that those long posts were another topic, but that doesnt excuse your dismissal of it being too complex and therefore untrue.
Like I said, there are some things that cannot be explained simply. And what does it mean to explain it simply? simply given the context, simply so that a layman can understand, or simply as in short and concise but may have to skip important details? I think its a terrible quote used for people to weasel their way out of learning something. Im not saying youre doing this, I dont care about you and talix's actual argument, and I know you are educating yourself regarding your new found Christianity. I just want to point out the quote isnt his and how its a dumb quote to use
heres a couple quotes by Feynman that make more sense and could contextually be more appropriate
"Hell, if I could explain it to the average person, it wouldn't have been worth the Nobel prize. "
"Once I asked him to explain to me, so that I can understand it, why spin-1/2 particles obey Fermi-Dirac statistics. Gauging his audience perfectly, he said, "I'll prepare a freshman lecture on it." But a few days later he came to me and said: "You know, I couldn't do it. I couldn't reduce it to the freshman level. That means we really don't understand it." |
Find anything he is responding to with that wall of text that is relevant to something I said in this thread.
And I see what you're point is with that, and yes it doesn't apply to every concept; however, there is a tendency for people who do not understand a concept very well to use long-winded explanations to try and get their point across, when someone with more in depth knowledge can explain it with fewer, more concise words. Again, not every situation, and it's not a quote that can be applied to everything, but it can be applied to somethings.
But really I was just making a dismissive joke because he's not even replying to anything I've said here, just doing his usual copy-paste nonsense as he is always relying on massive walls of text which I think he believes further validates his point, as if quantity outweighs quality.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|