 |
Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
 Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:08 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Channel GannoK wrote: | So because I choose not to engage with you asinine and futile ego driven attempts to convert everyone, that makes me a criminal in the eyes of Islam?
Religion of peace and acceptance. |
only a criminal would object to being held accountable for their wrong-doing.
Islam does not teach that we can convert anyone. it is rather because you refuse to engage in the truth that you are a criminal, and because you wrong your self. it comes to no surprise then that you facilitate and fabricate lies instead of come with respect, honesty, and manhood.
let it be shown that again, you demonstrate yourself to have no functional knowledge of the religion of Islam (and possibly any religion), but you are fine with saying you "understand it very well".
[Qur'an 18:29] And say: "The truth is from your Lord." Then whosoever wills, let him believe; and whosoever wills, let him disbelieve.
[Qur'an 28:56] Verily, you guide not whom you like
[Qur'an 10:108] Say: "O you mankind! Now truth (i.e. the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ), has come to you from your Lord. So whosoever receives guidance, he does so for the good of his own self; and whosoever goes astray, he does so to his own loss; and I am not (set) over you to arrange your affairs."
Islam is the religion of the natural state of man, the religion of reason and thought.
Allah has distinguished the truth from falsehood. He has enjoined all that is good and forbidden all that is evil.
[Qur'an 2:256] “There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in taghoot (false gods) and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break.”
[Qur'an 41:46] “Whosoever does righteous good deeds, it is for (the benefit of) his ownself; and whosoever does evil, it is against his ownself. And your Lord is not at all unjust to (His) slaves.”
guidance is in the hand of Allah.
if Allah willed, He could guide all of mankind, for there is nothing that He cannot ordain on this earth or in the heavens.
[Qur'an 6:149] Say: "With Allah is the perfect proof and argument, (i.e. the Oneness of Allah, the sending of His Messengers and His Holy Books, to mankind); had He so willed, He would indeed have guided you all."
[Qur'an 6:104] Verily, proofs have come to you from your Lord, so whosoever sees, will do so for (the good of) his ownself, and whosoever blinds himself, will do so to his own harm, and I am not a watcher over you.”
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK
pffrt
 Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greatsage wrote: | | Channel GannoK wrote: | So because I choose not to engage with you asinine and futile ego driven attempts to convert everyone, that makes me a criminal in the eyes of Islam?
Religion of peace and acceptance. |
only a criminal would object to being held accountable for their wrong-doing.
Islam does not teach that we can convert anyone. it is rather because you refuse to engage in the truth that you are a criminal, and because you wrong your self. it comes to no surprise then that you facilitate and fabricate lies instead of come with respect, honesty, and manhood.
let it be shown that again, you demonstrate yourself to have no functional knowledge of the religion of Islam (and possibly any religion), but you are fine with saying you "understand it very well".
[Qur'an 18:29] And say: "The truth is from your Lord." Then whosoever wills, let him believe; and whosoever wills, let him disbelieve.
[Qur'an 28:56] Verily, you guide not whom you like
[Qur'an 10:108] Say: "O you mankind! Now truth (i.e. the Quran and the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ), has come to you from your Lord. So whosoever receives guidance, he does so for the good of his own self; and whosoever goes astray, he does so to his own loss; and I am not (set) over you to arrange your affairs."
Islam is the religion of the natural state of man, the religion of reason and thought.
Allah has distinguished the truth from falsehood. He has enjoined all that is good and forbidden all that is evil.
[Qur'an 2:256] “There is no compulsion in religion. Verily, the Right Path has become distinct from the wrong path. Whoever disbelieves in taghoot (false gods) and believes in Allah, then he has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that will never break.”
[Qur'an 41:46] “Whosoever does righteous good deeds, it is for (the benefit of) his ownself; and whosoever does evil, it is against his ownself. And your Lord is not at all unjust to (His) slaves.”
guidance is in the hand of Allah.
if Allah willed, He could guide all of mankind, for there is nothing that He cannot ordain on this earth or in the heavens.
[Qur'an 6:149] Say: "With Allah is the perfect proof and argument, (i.e. the Oneness of Allah, the sending of His Messengers and His Holy Books, to mankind); had He so willed, He would indeed have guided you all."
[Qur'an 6:104] Verily, proofs have come to you from your Lord, so whosoever sees, will do so for (the good of) his ownself, and whosoever blinds himself, will do so to his own harm, and I am not a watcher over you.” |
Go fuck yourself, I've committed crimes against your religion, sure. But nobody gives a SHIT. You've comitted ACTUAL UNLAWFUL crimes and actions in your life. Do you see me branding you as a CRIMINAL?
You're a piece of shit, and it's not because you're a muslim, although that doesn't help your public perception much.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Channel GannoK wrote: | Go fuck yourself, I've committed crimes against your religion, sure. But nobody gives a SHIT. You've comitted ACTUAL UNLAWFUL crimes and actions in your life. Do you see me branding you as a CRIMINAL?
You're a piece of shit, and it's not because you're a muslim, although that doesn't help your public perception much. |
someone's triggered that they just got proved to be an ignorant, arrogant loudmouth.
& triggered that they were proved to know absolutely nothing about me or my religion.
you got mad quick, you should know that "The strong are not the best wrestlers. Verily, the strong are only those who control themselves when they are angry."
do you not know that Islam destroys that which came before it? turning to Islam means turning to God with a new and clean slate.
truly, you have committed crimes against yourself, crimes against my religion, and more. it is your own actions that brand you, not i.
as for what you accuse me of, there can be no doubt that your accusations are the words of a proven liar.
you will never be placed in a position to give testimony of another's character.
you are just behaving loud and annoying, and no good nor anything productive do i recollect as coming from you.
rectify your character before it is too late--
you have already been given good example that Allah changes the conditions of those who change what is within themselves.
the best people are those with the best character, and those who bring the most benefit to mankind.
do not anchor yourself in pride to counting your own ruin, do not proudly persist in increasing your bad character.
better yourself, and be beneficial to others.
you will die as you live, so fear the state in which you die and return to your Lord.
indeed, I invite you to a way that is better, and a religion of ease.
Islam does not demand perfection from us -- Islam is perfect, Muslims are not.
rather, Islam asks that we make continuous, sincere efforts to cultivate excellent character and good action.
come to Islam, and turn to goodness in action and character. God is ever-acquainted with what you do, and there is no doubt of the coming of the Day of Recompense and of His Perfect Justice.
listen to your heart, and use your reason;
this is the truth, and this is what is better for you.
[Quran 18:58] Yet, your Lord is the Forgiver, full of mercy.
[Qur'an 57:28] O you who believe, you shall reverence God and believe in His messenger. He will then grant you double the reward from His mercy, endow you with light to guide you, and forgive you. God is Forgiving, the Most Merciful.
[Qur'an 6:54] ... Your Lord has decreed that mercy is His attribute. Thus, anyone among you who commits a transgression out of ignorance, and repents thereafter and reforms, then He is Forgiving, Most Merciful.
[Qur'an 45:21] Or do those who commit evils think We will make them like those who have believed and done righteous deeds - [make them] equal in their life and their death? Evil is that which they judge.
[Qur'an 16:30-31,33-34] For those who do good in this world is good; and the home of the Hereafter is better. And how excellent is the home of the righteous -
Gardens of perpetual residence, which they will enter, beneath which rivers flow. They will have therein whatever they wish. Thus does Allah reward the righteous -
Do the disbelievers await [anything] except that the angels should come to them or there comes the command of your Lord? Thus did those do before them. And Allah wronged them not, but they had been wronging themselves.
So they were struck by the evil consequences of what they did and were enveloped by what they used to ridicule.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Channel GannoK
pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You're persecuting an atheist for his beliefs.
Some open minded paragon of virtue you are. You are so fucking stupid, hypocritical, and you have the ultimate lack of self awareness here. More than anyone I've ever known in life.
Just admit you believe in shariah law and want a caliphate you fucking terorist, quit going around your way to try and defend yourself as a nice person, when really you're just like the rest of religious america, ATTACK AND SHUN THE NON BELIEVERS, THEY MIGHT INFOUENCE OUR CHILDREN AWAY FROM GOD. Reject and deny the idea of taqiyah, and tell us the muslims who interpret the Quran, front to back literally, that they are the wrong ones and misinterept the word of god. Someone's gotta be wrong. And the book is supposed to be infallible.
You're fucking crazy and you do so much mental gymnastics
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Channel GannoK wrote: | You're persecuting an atheist for his beliefs.
Some open minded paragon of virtue you are. You are so fucking stupid, hypocritical, and you have the ultimate lack of self awareness here. More than anyone I've ever known in life.
Just admit you believe in shariah law and want a caliphate you fucking terorist, quit going around your way to try and defend yourself as a nice person, when really you're just like the rest of religious america, ATTACK AND SHUN THE NON BELIEVERS, THEY MIGHT INFOUENCE OUR CHILDREN AWAY FROM GOD. Reject and deny the idea of taqiyah, and tell the muslims who interpret the Quran, front to back literally, that they are the wrong ones.
You're fucking crazy and you do so much mental gymnastics |
i have not persecuted you. this is another lie from you.
we do not accept your testimony about others, Kyle. it is known your character is beyond exercising justice, and hearing you on others would be to extend your injustice upon them. it is one consequence of your being a braggart whom is incessant at dealing in abuse and malice.
>Just admit you believe in shariah law and want a caliphate you fucking terorist
you do not know what a caliphate is, or what shariah law is. if you did, you would not need a muslim to admit anything about them.
we already know your knowledge on these subjects is absent, so continue making a mockery of yourself.
an equivalent statement to a Christian might be, "just admit you want the 10 commandments!! and you want Jesus to return!!", how do you think that makes you look? it speaks volumes about your self-awareness, and willingness to speak in ignorance.
[Qur'an 60:8-9] "God does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes – from dealing kindly and justly with them. Indeed, God loves those who act justly.
God only forbids you from those who fight you because of religion and expel you from your homes and aid in your expulsion – (forbids) that you make allies of them. And whoever makes allies of them, then it is those who are the wrongdoers."
>really you're just like the rest of religious america, ATTACK AND SHUN THE NON BELIEVERS
this is expressly forbidden in Islam, and while i no longer need to justify my claims when speaking to the contrary of you on this subject, you are still easily refuted.
i have even previously presented quotations from the Qur'an on page 2 that refute this baseless and unsupported assertion.
however-- you are expressly demonstrating that this is your own value (to attack and shun those who believe different), along with your oblivious self-awareness accompanying hypocrisy after hypocrisy.
i urge you to do better and be better, and to understand there is no need for animosity to those of us who are successful in doing so.
[Qur'an 35:15] O mankind, you are those in need of Allah, while Allah is the Free of need, the Praiseworthy.
[Qur'an 38:2] But those who disbelieve are in pride and dissension.
[Qur'an 37:35] For they, when they were told that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, would puff themselves up with Pride,
[Qur'an 40:56] Indeed, those who dispute concerning the signs of Allah without [any] authority having come to them - there is not within their breasts except pride, [the extent of] which they cannot reach.
[Qur'an 3:20] And if they submit [in Islam], they are rightly guided; but if they turn away – then upon you is only the [duty of] notification. And Allah is Seeing of [His] servants.
[Qur'an 9:129] Still, if they turn away from you, say:
"God is sufficient for me; there is no deity but He. In Him have I put my trust, and He is the Lord of the Supreme Throne (as the absolute Ruler and Sustainer of the universe and all creation, Who maintains and protects it)."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
 Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
we loved that show til they started mocking religion. salaam alaikum, hope your day is going well
(Luke 24:36) As they said these things, Yeshua himself stood in the midst of them, and said to them, "Shalom Aleichem.."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
br0l0ck
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 36
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xavier is one of my favorite tv shows
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Brolock wrote: | | xavier is one of my favorite tv shows |
id welcome it back very quickly. lately ive been getting into anti-humor, we were evolved by eric andre. now im starting to get some of tim heidecker's humor.
together with gregg turkington they're brilliant
| HackOtaku wrote: | | Jesus was both man and God |
since that doesn't make any sense in the english language, or logically, it is important to seek the answer to the question of what the 'death of Jesus' truly means; in what sense did Jesus die --
Who died, How of, what?
who:
according to James White:
A God-man is dying.
By John 1:14, the Son became ‘one’ with the flesh of Christ.
There is no intermingling of the natures.
The divine nature does not cease to be divine.
The human nature does not become something other than (or more) than human.
The union (or the union of the God man) died.
now we have the who, and have to ask what the death means for the God-man. death has many meanings, and pastor Thabiti Anyabwile states that the death of Christ (God-man) is:
| Pastor Thabiti Anyabwile wrote: | | Jesus died. What can it mean to say the Son of God died? And how should the Christian respond to that news? The death of Jesus Christ means the death of death itself. The death of death in the death of Jesus Christ also means victory over death for those who trust in Christ as their God and Savior. |
circular reasoning is employed here, he has said that the death of Jesus means the death of death. yet, what is death and how can death itself die?
in answering this problem, he gives six definitions for death:
Death is a curse (Genesis 2:15-17).
Death is wage (Romans 6:23).
Death is an enemy (Jeremiah 9:21).
Death is an agony (Luke 16:23-24),
Death is both a physical and spiritual death (Ephesians 2:1-2,5).
There are two deaths for unbelievers (Revelations 20:11-15).
by these (five) things being nullified/conquered by the divine Son, we are to understand that death 'died'.
it can be said that the Christ died a physical death by the hands of an enemy, through which he suffered agony and in doing so, the divine Son paid (nullified) the wages of sin and ended the curse of God upon the sinners.
this holistically covers points one through five, wherewith each nature playing a distinctive and fundamental role.
pastor Samuel Green agrees with this definition, given his endorsement of a comment made by a colleague of his via a discussion with myself, which was rendered as such:
| pastor Samuel Green wrote: | | “His physical body ceased to function, and a non-physical or immaterial aspect of His ontology became disembodied.” |
given all of what we’ve been told by erudite christian apologists, we’re still at a juncture of disillusion – who actually died this physical death?
James White says that the divine Son became incarnate in the human known as Jesus, and the result is the God-man, without the two natures combining, yet he’s calls it a union, and a union is by definition the joining two two entities:
The action or fact of joining together or being joined together, esp. in a political context.
how can they be a ‘union’ and yet the two distinct natures not be joined together?
it seems then, James White is speaking paradoxically (inconsistently).
the Catholic Encyclopedia attempts to give us some clarity (please note, by catholics they mean Trinitarian Christians):
Nestorians: One person, two hypostases, two natures.
Catholics: One person, one hypostasis, two natures.
Monophysites: One person, one hypostasis, one nature.
given pastor Samuel’s definition and that of pastor Thabiti’s, we understand that the God-man suffered a physical death.
this would mean that the human (the body, the flesh) of the Son which is the Christ, died.
Jesus has two natures, his divine nature known as the Son and his human nature known as the flesh and blood of the Christ.
if he died a physical death (and this what is being claimed)-- then the flesh and blood of Christ died, that is the human nature died.
this now, brings us to a startling conclusion – the premise of John 3:16 is nothing short of a fallacious myth.
(John 3:16) For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
yet, it is not the Son (divine nature) which died, but it is the physical Jesus which died.
if we take James White’s claim of the union of the God-man ‘dying’, then we come to the conclusion that the death of a union is the separation of both entities, i.e. the union is no more – the divine Son is no longer incarnate in the flesh of the human known as the Jesus.
this therefore presents a problem for Christianity, besides the Bible being wrong, the death itself was no major sacrifice. by the terms laid out by paul of tarsus and Thabiti, there is wages of death necessary for every person, and all of mankind, and so one person can not suffice, a bigger suffice must be necessary.
to understand this, i must simplify my terms of argumentation:
Son (divine nature) became incarnate in a human shell known as the blood and flesh of Jesus.
the flesh perished/suffered, but the (divine) Son, did not.
from this, it is therefore clear, that the shell is what died, and the death of a human, as Shaykh Deedat concludes, cannot pay for the sins of mankind -- only the death of the Son can achieve this -- which is what John 3:16 appeals to, but of which the Christological rendition of the death betrays.
this leaves us with not only confusion, mistrust and a lack of salvation, but most importantly – we’re left with the impression that Christians themselves do not understand what the death of the God man implies and how it affects their theology.
given all of the definitions, examples and explanations demonstrated, in the end – what we see is a belief on one end of the Christological spectrum and a practical reality on the other.
in saying this, the body which the divine Son could have entered (become incarnate), could have been any animate shell – another human such as a female or even an animal.
as shocking as it is, the body and flesh of the human Jesus does not matter, as what is needed for salvation according to Christianity -- is not the death of a human, but the death of a divine Son which they clearly do not believe in through saying that there is a dual nature to Jesus, who is fully God and fully man.
it is simply one of the classic go-to arguments by our christian brothers and sisters to argue that only the human nature suffered, not the divine nature.
the reason this is argued is to circumvent the law of non-contradiction. what is the law of non-contradiction?
A cannot be A and not-A at the same time.
to circumvent this, we are told Jesus has two natures, so he suffered in one nature (the human nature or A) and didn’t suffer in another nature (the divine nature or B).
on the surface this may seem like a reasonable response, until you break it down:
Jesus, the 2nd person of the trinity and therefore God, can be said to have suffered. to say otherwise is to deny the personhood of Jesus in totality as the Trinitarian schema is presented to us. i.e., as the God-man suffered, so must the 2nd person of the trinity have suffered.
many christians and calvinists in particular are fond of this argument-- but other Christians historically and popularly accuse them of being nestorians by dividing Jesus into two persons, a human person and a divine person.
those who argue in the form that Calvinists and most other popular Christian speakers do, fall prey to being declared apostates:
| Council of Ephesus (431 CE) wrote: | | If anyone distributes between the two persons or hypostases the expressions used either in the gospels or in the apostolic writings, whether they are used by the holy writers of Christ or by him about himself, and ascribes some to him as to a man, thought of separately from the Word from God, and others, as befitting God, to him as to the Word from God the Father, let him be anathema. |
we can abstract this ontological model even further:
God-man {(Father), (Son), (Holy Spirit)}
in this rendition, we can say the God-man suffered, as we are told each member of the Godhead is fully divine. so to say Jesus has two natures--and only one nature, the human nature suffered, is literally the heresy of nestorianism.
to say God-man died then rose again, is against saying only the human nature died/resurrected/suffered, as according to the trinity, it's still one being, one God-man, the whole God-man suffered and died equally.
[Qur'an 4:157-158] and for their boast, "Behold, we have slain the Christ Jesus, son of Mary, [who claimed to be] an apostle of God!"
However, they did not slay him, and neither did they crucify him, but it only seemed to them [as if it had been] so;
and, verily, those who hold conflicting views thereon are indeed confused, having no [real] knowledge thereof, and following mere conjecture.
For, of a certainty, they did not slay him:
nay, God exalted him unto Himself - and God is indeed Almighty, Wise.
Last edited by finnegan waking up on Mon Oct 21, 2019 5:52 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i hope you reflect carefully on the many objections i have presented, HackOtaku.
i can not understand how you are so certain that other interpretations on John 8:58 are wrong,
while with your proposed interpretation--which is so fundamental for attaining salvation through love of a God which, with it, you can not understand or indisputably come to an understanding or identification of Him or His nature.
rather, it requires vague, implicit statements in ambiguous verses, verses that are not in the language of Jesus (so how could they reliably transmit the exact meaning, or authenticate that the transmission has been kept without interpolation, fabrication, or error?)
we can reliably transmit what was said by Muhammad ﷺ, because we have contemporary records, and written/oral records&traditions which can be scrutinised to ensure that no statements can be (or which have been) fabricated, and that what statements are known are reliably known and transmitted (and even to what degree of reliability and transmission), especially from known eye-witnesses and corroborating accounts directly from them and Muhammad's ﷺ companions.
we can also reliably demonstrate that the Qur'an has not been changed and is in the same original form as when it was revealed to Muhammad ﷺ, and we have it in its entirety.
see this video for more: How To Prove The Quran Has Been Preserved Accurately
youtube.com/watch?v=n281Zyywyn4
you don't have a full record of what has been attributed to Jesus, and there is not a similar standard or science of transmission in Christianity.
so how is it then that such a preserved revelation, and authentic transmissions, are not preferable to the foundation of the bible -- which is full of different and unknown authors, errors, and is not in its original form? there are many bibles, but there is only one Qur'an.
furthermore, how can you come to be foundationally opposed to the evil Jews being deceived into thinking they had succeeded in their deception and sin-- while holding that God either
(a) was lying about His nature in the old testament, or
(b) was hiding His true nature of being a Trinity, His relationship as three personalities, etc. for hundreds of years after Jesus
either way, how can you hold the deception of (a) or (b) preferable to
God being One, God being consistent in the old testament and with the words of Jesus (i.e., the interpretation that he was subordinate, submitting to, worshiping servant of God, no more than a mighty prophet and the Messiah), and also saving Jesus -- by answering his prayers for salvation?
please note that saying "Islam is just fabricated to lower Jesus to raise Muhammad ﷺ" can not only be demonstrably false by the biography of the Prophet ﷺ and historical evidence of the revelation of Qur'an, but it is also poisoning the well to avoid rational, critical analysis.
here is a very great website for addressing such claims of borrowing:
islamic-awareness.org/quran/sources/
i have read your posts many times so i hope you can return the favour and read, then re-read my posts.
i would suggest too, that you finally read the Qur'an so that you may have a better understanding of what Islam is presenting, vs. what you believe in -- the same way you did with christianity vs. your beliefs of atheism/agnosticism.
clearquran.com
quran.com
it is also best to get some historical context to understand whom the Qur'an speaks to among certain groups, and the circumstances of the revelation of the Qur'an, and Prophethood of Muhammad ﷺ, so that you may understand how Islam came to succeed against seemingly insurmountable struggles, to becoming the most popular religion, and Muhammad ﷺ the most influential person in history.
i really prefer the Umar series, as it is very accurate.
islamicity.org/9106/omar-ibn-khattab-series/
but if you want some good written biographies of the life of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, perhaps I can recommend to you The Sealed Nectar,
or perhaps "Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources" by Martin Lings (an atheist convert to Islam).
its.org.uk/podcasts/
i really thoroughly enjoyed this one, and it is broken into multiple parts.
also, i highly recommend this audiobook, from the convert Yusuf Islam (raised christian):
youtube.com/watch?v=DCNb6lopYZw
truthfully i can not approach these without tears, as i find myself intoxicated by my love for the Prophet ﷺ, and the mercy of Allah upon me. anyone who sincerely studies this man can appreciate and love him. it is only because of Allah's guidance through Muhammad ﷺ, and his most highest example of faith and character,
that i am certain that Jesus is the virgin-born Messiah who will return to rule and judge.
may God preserve you in truth and patience, and guide us to Him in His righteous path: inspiring and filling our hearts to incline to Him, humbly and wholly, so that we may be well-pleasing to His Majestic Countenance; eternally at peace as servants of the Most High.
ameen, and may the peace, blessings, and mercy of God be with you, HackOtaku.
salaam
Last edited by finnegan waking up on Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:32 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Channel GannoK
pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Talix you're such a piece of shit.
I bet you disagree with the 4th amendment. In fact I'm willing to say that you haven't even read the constitution from beginning to end. Good thing you know your muslim laws though, you know, the ones that don't actually apply to every single American.
| an annoying muslim faggot woman abuser wrote: | | only a criminal would object to being held accountable for their wrong-doing. |
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Channel GannoK wrote: | Talix you're such a piece of shit.
I bet you disagree with the 4th amendment. In fact I'm willing to say that you haven't even read the constitution from beginning to end. Good thing you know your muslim laws though, you know, the ones that don't actually apply to every single American.
| an annoying muslim faggot woman abuser wrote: | | only a criminal would object to being held accountable for their wrong-doing. |
|
i have, it was required for government class. our teacher taught us the mneomnic "GATE", to think of search and seizure of property and possessions.
i do not abuse women. nor am i a faggot, but i know you have admitted to being one. so it is no surprise you may be admitting you abuse women too.
you are showing me to have been correct when I said
| Quote: | | it is known your character is beyond exercising justice, and hearing you on others would be to extend your injustice upon them. it is one consequence of your being a braggart whom is incessant at dealing in abuse and malice. |
btw, since you are obviously ignorant on it, you might want to familiarise yourself with the islamic origins of the common law:
scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3823&context=nclr
as you can not understand the constitution without it
lawliberty.org/liberty-forum/why-you-cant-understand-the-constitution-without-the-common-law/
moreover, as a Muslim, i am required to follow the law of the land i reside in, while obeying Allah and His Messenger ﷺ.
you'd know that if you ever bothered to understand what you criticised or opened your mouth on.
case and point, you're asking me about the 4th amendment and if i know it, but you had to google it
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
531.74 KB |
| Viewed: |
4409 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Channel GannoK
pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greatsage wrote: | | Channel GannoK wrote: | Talix you're such a piece of shit.
I bet you disagree with the 4th amendment. In fact I'm willing to say that you haven't even read the constitution from beginning to end. Good thing you know your muslim laws though, you know, the ones that don't actually apply to every single American.
| an annoying muslim faggot woman abuser wrote: | | only a criminal would object to being held accountable for their wrong-doing. |
|
i have, it was required for government class. our teacher taught us the mneomnic "GATE", to think of search and seizure of property and possessions.
i do not abuse women. nor am i a faggot, but i know you have admitted to being one. so it is no surprise you may be admitting you abuse women too.
you are showing me to have been correct when I said
| Quote: | | it is known your character is beyond exercising justice, and hearing you on others would be to extend your injustice upon them. it is one consequence of your being a braggart whom is incessant at dealing in abuse and malice. |
btw, since you are obviously ignorant on it, you might want to familiarise yourself with the islamic origins of the common law:
scholarship.law.unc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3823&context=nclr
as you can not understand the constitution without it
lawliberty.org/liberty-forum/why-you-cant-understand-the-constitution-without-the-common-law/
moreover, as a Musilm, i am required to follow the law of the land i reside in, while obeying Allah and His Messenger ﷺ.
you'd know that if you ever bothered to understand what you criticised or opened your mouth on.
case and point, you're asking me about the 4th amendment and if i know it, but you had to google it |
I dont have a history of abusing women, or at least credible accusations.
Who have I abused Talix?
I can name 1 person everyone here knows that you abused. I'm sure there's plenty more.
Remember,
| a REALLY annoying muslim faggot woman abuser in denial wrote: | | only a criminal would object to being held accountable for their wrong-doing. |
IM telling you this from a place of love talix. You have a psychotic block. You truly believe you did nothing wrong, despite the evidence and witness accounts. People I don't even like will agree with me that you are a woman abuser, or at the very least was one in the past when you were younger, and it only makes people wary It doesnt seem like your parents raised you well at all..
Quit your misogynistic religion and seek medical help immediately.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you actually have no testimony from anyone who knows me or has witnessed how i treat women or anyone. the women in my life love me and will defend against your allegations.
i never claimed to be perfect, but you have no capacity to offer anything but baseless insults. i have nothing but pity for you, and you justify that every time you speak.
continue trying to misconstrue things to excuse your behaviour and cover up the embarrassing humiliation you have been put through. i take accountability for myself and do what i can do improve myself and do better.
there is no one here who can testify that you are a respectful, or good individual. there is only malice , abuse , and ignorance to be found at your hand, and we all know it. the state of no one else will remove the accountability of your deeds and manners, and debasing others will not finally grant you the manhood you envy in others
| TheIndianGuy wrote: | | cool it with the hipster vibes and erroneous assumptions about others, you're not smart enough to put 2 and 2 together. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Channel GannoK
pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 7:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| a REALLY fucking stupid psychotic and annoying muslim faggot woman abuser in denial wrote: | | only a criminal would object to being held accountable for their wrong-doing. |
also. I would rather be perceived as a piece of shit, for the sake of freedom and comedy, than actually be a piece of shit and live with those consequences, while claiming to be a good person, living in denial and a false reality that is not true to the self. Which is what all of you do. It's so funny.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
