| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jiehfeng Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Jan 2014 Posts: 107
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ParkourPenguin I post too much
Reputation: 152
Joined: 06 Jul 2014 Posts: 4706
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 11:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
"Scan error: no readable memory found" means that CE can't read any memory in the region you've specified. In case you don't know what this means for you, I'll just say your start and stop bounds are too big.
I'm pretty sure most CPUs nowadays only allow 48-bit addressing in a 64-bit virtual address space. The upper 16 bits are unnecessary at this point since 256 TB of virtual memory is more than enough.
If you're attached to a 32-bit process, you should be smart enough to figure out what you're doing wrong yourself.
_________________
I don't know where I'm going, but I'll figure it out when I get there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jiehfeng Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Jan 2014 Posts: 107
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ParkourPenguin I post too much
Reputation: 152
Joined: 06 Jul 2014 Posts: 4706
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just look at the error.
"Scan error: no readable memory found"
There is no readable memory in the bounds you've specified. As I said previously, this is because there should be no memory between 2^48 and 2^64.
Change the "Start" and "Stop" address bounds to something else. For example, change the "Stop" to 2^47-1, 7FFFFFFFFFFF, and change "Start" to something less than that.
Setting it further than 2^63 might have made it overflow back into a normal memory region. I'd consider that a bug in this case as it's not what you should be doing.
_________________
I don't know where I'm going, but I'll figure it out when I get there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tybobobo Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 24 May 2016 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Did you add a process to begin with?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|