Cheat Engine

[1929394839292057839194958]

[Up2Admin]

[Antagonist]

[HitIer]

[HackOtaku]

[1929394839292057839194958]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tUFTvww-lU
He said the political revolution shit from the beginning

[HitIer]

[Antagonist]

[1929394839292057839194958]

There a bunch of things that I agree with you about actually. I've looked into all of the candidates a decent amount and I think while Trump is in many ways a pompous fool he would also do certain things really well. I think out of all of the people that are in the running he's probably going to be the best candidate when it comes to certain economical things.

That unfortunately doesn't take away the worry I have about his character and true intentions (and some things like deporting a fuckload of people, his wall, or getting muslims to wear id tags) as even though years ago in interviews he seemed a lot more sincere it doesn't quite click to me anymore. He seems somewhat different and actually less professional. He seems worse at speaking and some ticks that he lets through make me think he doesn't believe what he says in many cases in public.

Thanks for the actual good response btw. It's retarded when people on here literally just call eachother retards with zero actual arguments for either side. You've done it a few times but I think almost all of the time it's been Kyle implying that because you support Trump your opinion is invalid, without really actually giving a reason as to why but still saying that you don't know what you're talking about or something like that. Disagreeing with people apparently can't be done without just attacking eachother. I know that's a bit ironic or hypocritical sounding coming from me, but most of the time when I have done that in the past it's been a bit exaggerated on purpose and it was a good while ago.

[Antagonist]

I think Sanders although may have some great ideas to implement, I don't think he is the leader we need now to inspire cultural change in America. I don't think he shows enough strength and dominance to really move the American people. I think he would be a great manager though. But I feel America has been in such a slump, not only do we need a president that can fix our economic issue as well as reestablish our relationships with our allies, but a person who can move the whole forefront of America. Invigorate our culture and traditions. What I mean by a manager is that, I think he can keep the good times good, but I dont he has the personality to uplift Americans from the hole we dug ourselves in.

With deportation, one way or another, we have to enforce our laws. I think it would be naive of people to think that it's not a problem when it clearly is. Illegal immigration that is. They're not documented. We don't even know how many illegal immigrants we have because they're not documented. First it was around 7 or 8 million then became 11 and some others claim it is much more than that. We don't even know. It makes illegal immigrants who are criminal much easier to commit crime since we don't have a track record on them. They can just pop up in the different states and impose themselves in new identities. We don't know. Theres one thing that we can't discuss is the critical problem in illegal immigration. I think people must agree that this is a problem.

What we can discuss about is how to alleviate and fix this situation in a humane way. We hear deportation and we think that we're just going to round up people using military force and send them back, possibly separating them from their families. I don't think anybody that has a heart can really be that cruel and I don't think Trump is such a psychopath to do it in that method. Plus it cost a lot of money to enforce it that way. I think a more viable way to do it and Im sure hes thought of different scenarios is requiring all companies to do checks on all their employees and report it to the government and fining them X amount per illegal immigrant they hire. No job = they're going to move back on their own.

As far as the wall goes. Our southern border is actually the weakest vector in US geography. We're totally vulnerable there. From drugs and crime and now more than ever - vulnerable for a terrorist infiltration.

One of our top generals actually says that our southern border is an existential threat to the US
http://www.defenseone.com/threats/2014/07/top-general-says-mexico-border-security-now-existential-threat-us/87958/

I think the wall is really the most logical solution to this. Many European countries are now actually building a wall of some sort around their borders. I cant remember the names of the country, I was reading about it the other day. If you think about it, what's so ridiculous about securing our borders?

I've always been open to discussions. I've only really been an asshole to Kyle because of certain attitudes he expresses. I didn't even start it. First time I posted about these issues, I posted about what I thought, I didn't attack anybody personally and he comes and says something along the lines that Im stupid and I must be republican (I didn't even bring up that I was republican in my post). So in my head, I'm asking, who is he to call me stupid? Who is he to be so forceful of his opinions and undermine my opinions? Why is he acting as a self-entitled expert on these opinions? And some he talks about things he clearly doesn't understand. I've tried reasoning with him multiple times and when I realize that he was a stereotypical liberal and I couldn't reason with him, I just assumed he's purposefully being ignorant and didn't take him seriously at all. This comes from him being naturally egocentric. He may think otherwise, but this behavior comes from egocentrism. He jumps into conclusions, forces his opinions on others, and when others have different opinions he lashes out (bigotry). A civil and intelligent person would ask insightful questions and have genuine curiosity to why the other person has a different opinion and why they believe what they believe. Absolute hypocrite.

[HitIer]

In this letter I'm not going to discuss Mr. Bernie Sanders's prior wrongdoings. Instead, I intend to focus only on Sanders's current, unsophisticated plans for the future. For those of you who like to eat dessert before soup, my conclusion at the end of this letter is going to be that Sanders is a man utterly without honor, without principles, without a shred of genuine patriotism. That's why I say that if I chose to do so I could write exclusively about his procacious announcements and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how if I didn't think Sanders would toss sops to the egos of the vicious, I wouldn't say that he plans to interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights in a lustrum or two. I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that Sanders's secret passion is to turn over our country to sick tatterdemalions. For shame!

Although Sanders is trying to portray himself as a great philosopher on par with Wittgenstein or some such personage, he's more than fractious. Sanders is mega-fractious. In fact, to understand just how fractious he is, you first need to realize that Sanders never stops boasting about his generous contributions to charitable causes. As far as I can tell, however, his claimed magnanimousness is utterly chimerical, and, furthermore, Sanders's biggest lie is that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Sure, he might be able to peddle that boatload of parisology to the hayseeds, but he doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. Sanders's pledge not to cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination is merely empty rhetoric, invoked on occasion for theatrical effect but otherwise studiously ignored. Sanders's platitudes are not witty satire, as he would have you believe. They're simply the waspish ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what he's mocking.

Sanders says that every word that leaves his mouth is teeming with useful information. Although Sanders definitely cut that statement out of whole cloth, if we can understand what has caused the current plague of empty-headed, misinformed freeloaders, I believe that we can then get people to sign a petition to limit his ability to cause trouble. Pardon my saying so, but he's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of fanaticism and you'll see a self-deluded vulgarian hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of zabernism in a short-sighted, noisome attempt to indoctrinate jealous popinjays with ready-made conclusions on controversial subjects. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that Sanders is planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to eviscerate every bit of social progress of the past century. There is historical precedent for Sanders's bait-and-switch tactics. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, he has been draining the national fisc. Given how one tyrannous activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that I have no idea why Sanders avows that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion. Perhaps the thought popped into his head during omphaloskepsis. In any case, Sanders wants to convince people that their peers are already riding the Bernie Sanders bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Sanders's gossamer grasp of reality.

Sanders apparently believes that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. You and I know better than that. You and I know that we should give Sanders a taste of his own medicine. You may have detected a hint of sarcasm in the way I phrased that last statement, but I assure you that I am not exaggerating the situation. In order for us to realize more happiness in our lives we need to understand that he keeps saying that everything he says is entirely and completely true. This is the most stereotypical, immature, unimaginative, by-the-numbers load of second-hand baloney I've ever heard. The truth is that there's an important difference between me and Sanders. Namely, I, for one, am willing to die for my cause. Sanders, in contrast, is willing to kill for his—or, if not to kill, at least to make my stomach turn.

You don't have to say anything specifically about Sanders for him to start attacking you. All you have to do is dare to imply that we should invite all the people who have been harmed by Sanders to continue to express and assert their concerns in a constructive and productive fashion. On the face of it, the need to provide a ruthless criticism of his pouty perorations seems obvious to the point of being trite. Any yet, at the root of all of that lies the deeply radical notion that Sanders alleges that education should be focused entirely on such bosh as “self-actualization”, “finding one's joy”, “minority empowerment”, “contextualizing knowledge”, and “performing one's identity”. It should have nothing to do with actually gaining knowledge or learning facts, facts such as that I recently heard a famous celebrity—I forgot which one—say, “I find Sanders's endeavors uninformed, uncompanionable, tendentious, and more than a little amateurish.” That's such a great quote, I wish I had been the one who thought of it. Sadly, the cleverest thing I ever said was that for the first time ever, a majority of repulsive passéists have been questioning their role in helping Sanders make incorrect leaps of logic. I insist that we should take advantage of this historic opportunity and put Sanders's adversarial actions to the question.

Sanders is a tribute to our collective gullibility. Promise us anything that sounds cheap, free, or too good to be true, and you've got us hooked. That's why so many people believe Sanders when he says that his nemeses are aligned with very dark and malevolent fourth-dimensional aliens known as Draconians. The reality, in contrast, is that there's only one true drama queen around here, and he's the one wearing the crown. I certainly can't stand him or his understrappers. That much is crystal clear. But did you know that when I see Sanders giving his implicit approval—and in some cases explicit approval—to control what we do and how we do it I think that on many issues, discussions with Sanders quickly turn into fights, and dialogues soon degenerate into name-calling? That's why I'm telling you that Sanders's demented form of Bulverism is like a forest fire. Once it is started, none can set bounds to the resulting conflagration. The only option is to fight for what is right. While doing so won't put a stop to Bulverism, it will demonstrate decisively that Sanders's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of ethics. Others are in the form of ballyhoos. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion.

After being called a sex-crazed rantipole a hundred times or so by Sanders and his representatives, I have reached the conclusion that I need your help if I'm ever to give parents the means to protect their children. “But I'm only one person,” you might protest. “What difference can I make?” The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, listening to Sanders talk about obfuscating the issue so that one can't see what ought to be absolutely obvious to all is like watching a colonial power laying out a plan to force its language, culture, laws, religion, and ideals on a subject people. The put-upon natives in this case are those of us bold enough to state in public that groupthink and mob behavior are common within Sanders's gang. Hence, it isn't unusual for one who commits heresy against Sanders's established dogma to be exiled from the community. The sad part is that these outcasts still refuse to believe that Sanders needs to come to terms with his vapid past. That represents yet more evidence—as if we needed more—that a bunch of furacious extremists have recently been accused of abetting ethnic genocide, dictatorships, and complacent, cruel pinheads. Sanders's fingerprints are all over that operation. Even if it turns out that he is not ultimately responsible for instigating it, the sheer amount of his involvement demands answers. For instance, how can we break Sanders's hypnotic spell over sententious gasbags? Whenever that question is asked, Sanders and his apostles run and hide. I suspect that that's precisely what they're going to do now so as to avoid hearing me say that Sanders has been trying hard to convince us that he is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes. He unmistakably has a knack for refining snake oil to unprecedented purity, potency, and opacity, doesn't he? In any case, I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Sanders engulf reason and humanity within waves of Bonapartism and fear. It makes me want to catalogue his swindles and perversions, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that if Sanders doesn't see anything wrong with instilling a subconscious feeling of guilt in those of us who disagree with his shell games then perhaps he doesn't deserve all the support he's getting from us.

As I like to say, when a child first learns to draw in a coloring book, he or she has no patience for lines and boundaries and so the crayon is spread evenly across the page. I am afraid that Sanders's menials have succumbed to this temptation by spreading Sanders's sanguinolent, morbid scribblings throughout society. I avouch we must combat this unforgiving effort by letting everyone know that we should use our words to create understanding and progress, not hatred and division. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that just as night follows day, Sanders will tip the scales in his favor sometime soon. Couldn't you figure that out for yourself, Sanders? The picture I am presenting need not be confined to his stratagems. It applies to everything Sanders says and does.

It must be pointed out over and over again to Sanders's confederates and, in a broader sense, to pesky, unsympathetic inebriates that Sanders gets particularly concerned whenever someone indicates that we're all in this mess together. He should realize, however, that such negative opinions of him simply come with the territory. Rather than try to suppress the unflattering things people say about him, Sanders would do well to consider that he's afflicted with what I call Radicalism Addiction Disorder. Symptoms include loss of control, craving and withdrawal symptoms, social isolation, excessive financial debt, and an insatiable desire to destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. The only known cure is for Sanders to admit that he indeed believes that the sky is falling. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Sanders needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that you may make the comment, “What does this have to do with the worst types of crafty personæ non gratæ there are?” Well, once you begin to see the light you'll realize that he's a hard worker. Sanders works hard to prevent anyone from commenting on his uppity obloquies. This is of course most illuminating, but what if we wish to engage rather in eristic search for truth, or in heuristic debate, or perhaps in paromologetic illation? In my experience, Sanders says that he needs a little more time to clean up his act. As far as I'm concerned, Sanders's time has run out.

Whenever someone accuses Sanders of demonstrating an outright hostility to law enforcement, his one-size-fits-all response is that students should be molded into “change agents” to promote his doolally agenda. This galimatias should make you realize that the first thing we need to do is to get Sanders to admit that he has a problem. He should be counseled to recite the following:

I, Bernie Sanders, am a spiteful rake.
I have been a participant in a giant scheme to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence.
I hereby admit my addiction to interventionism. I ask for the strength and wisdom to fight this addiction.
Once Sanders realizes that he has a problem, maybe then he'll see that he has been trying to raise funds for scientific studies that “prove” that his way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. This is what's called “advocacy research” or “junk science” because it's funded by biased, confrontational criminal masterminds who have already decided that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones. What I had wanted for this letter was to write an analysis of Mr. Bernie Sanders's fibs—not an exhortation or a shrill denunciation but an analysis. I hope I have succeeded at that.

[Channel GannoK]

^ Giant wall of text no one wants read

[BreakinGods]

ghet·to

noun
1.
a part of a city, especially a slum area, occupied by a minority group or groups.
verb
1.
put in or restrict to an isolated or segregated area or group.

It's funny because what he is saying is 100% correct, but people don't know what ghetto means lmao

[HitIer]

[Antagonist]

Pretty sure Trump will win Idaho too. Hawaii not so sure since its a caucus. But would be dope if he takes all 4 states today.