she is only like 2 inches below average height for women, which isn't really that short. unless you are talking about her dressing in rainbow unicorn/swan clothing, then in that case it's clothing fetish.
you guys bring up some valid points, but brolock is a pedo none the less. _________________
Quote:
yo i b 22 tryna make it in dis rap game but da steetz dont got luv for no wun na mean so im out hea tryna holla at da fams on dis innernet shit u no way i sayin
He's a pedo because she's dressed as a child and he's pointing this specific one, plus every other thing he's ever said.
why do you guys make a big deal about finding teenage looking girls attractive.
they're controlled by the jewish media to get beat up old women to suppress pleasure, and to only fuck them with mutilated dicks. to enjoy silicon tits and make-up instead of natural youthful beauty
He's a pedo because she's dressed as a child and he's pointing this specific one, plus every other thing he's ever said.
why do you guys make a big deal about finding teenage looking girls attractive.
they're controlled by the jewish media to get beat up old women to suppress pleasure, and to only fuck them with mutilated dicks. to enjoy silicon tits and make-up instead of natural youthful beauty
I think It's ok to be romantically and intellectually involved with underage people, but sexual relations is where you can corrupt and ruin the first 2 labeled. _________________
being romantically and intellectually involved with underage sounds more insidious. you can influence them greatly and shape the way they think, its very influential years. they could become overly attached. a lot of things could go wrong, that itself sounds dirty.
sexual is purely physical, urges everyone has, that they would have and want to satiate regardless of your involvement. there's an age where it becomes gross for the older one in the party, but if you think romantic and intellectual relations are ok in this context then you wouldn't care about a max age, which sounds pretty gross dude.
being romantically and intellectually involved with underage sounds more insidious. you can influence them greatly and shape the way they think, its very influential years. they could become overly attached. a lot of things could go wrong, that itself sounds dirty.
sexual is purely physical, urges everyone has, that they would have and want to satiate regardless of your involvement. there's an age where it becomes gross for the older one in the party, but if you think romantic and intellectual relations are ok in this context then you wouldn't care about a max age, which sounds pretty gross dude.
Legally, no. Personally? I wouldn't touch a woman a day older than 40 _________________
being romantically and intellectually involved with underage sounds more insidious. you can influence them greatly and shape the way they think, its very influential years. they could become overly attached. a lot of things could go wrong, that itself sounds dirty.
sexual is purely physical, urges everyone has, that they would have and want to satiate regardless of your involvement. there's an age where it becomes gross for the older one in the party, but if you think romantic and intellectual relations are ok in this context then you wouldn't care about a max age, which sounds pretty gross dude.
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Next
Page 1 of 5
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Reputation: 23
Reputation: 108
Reputation: 130
