Cheat Engine

[HackOtaku]

We get it, your joke is that your name is shit and that you always shitpost, so that all of Shit's posts are shitposts, but you're going on too far with it.

[HitIer]

This letter contains some tough news. It's not pleasant to hear, but it's very important, and it's part of telling the truth. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream. Nevertheless, if we don't show HackOtaku how it is as wrong as wrong can be, then it will soon become unstoppable. No borders will be able to detain it. No united global opinion will be able to isolate it. No international police or juridical institutions will be able to interdict it.

Everybody knows that HackOtaku is unfit to hold any responsible position in government or anywhere else, but you should consider that HackOtaku has stated that its manifestos prevent smallpox. That's just pure frotteurism. Well, in HackOtaku's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that people sometimes ask me why I seem incapable of saying anything nice about HackOtaku. I'd like to—really, I would. The problem is, I can't think of anything nice to say. I guess that's not surprising when you consider that HackOtaku may unwittingly turn the trickle of anti-intellectualism into a tidal wave. I say “unwittingly” because it is apparently unaware that it operates under the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why HackOtaku is absolutely determined to believe that it's a living bodhisattva of peace and nonviolence, and it's not about to let facts or reason get in its way.

Be careful not to be charmed by HackOtaku's proposed social programs. All they do is expand, augment, and intensify the size and intrusiveness of HackOtaku's brownshirt brigade. HackOtaku's comrades have recently enjoyed some success at forcing us to adopt rigid social roles that compromise our inner code of ethics. HackOtaku considers this a reason to kvell. In contrast, I consider it a reason to lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight.

We have much to fear from HackOtaku. Personally, I'm afraid that by next weekend, it'll impale us on a Morton's Fork: Either we let it lead us, lemminglike, over the precipice of self-destruction, or it'll grant a free ride to the undeserving. Regardless of which we choose, it is mathematically provable that our real enemy is the shabby system that made HackOtaku as maladroit as it is. I'm not actually familiar with the proof for that statement and wouldn't understand it even if it were shown to me, but it seems very believable based upon my experience. What's also quite believable is that certain facts are clear. For instance, you should be able to live your life the way you want to live it. You shouldn't have to live in fear of HackOtaku replacing our timeless traditions with its obstinate, closed-minded ones.

HackOtaku frequently insists that those of us who oppose it would rather run than fight. This lie of its cannot stand the light of day, and a few minutes' reflection will suffice to show how utterly truculent a lie it is. Nonetheless, its pontifications are a ticking time bomb, set to force its moral code on the rest of us. Disguised in this drollery is an important message: Some people think it's a bit extreme of me to provide an antidote to contemporary manifestations of deluded, shallow officialism—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that many of the most valued members of our community believe in educating the public on a range of issues. HackOtaku, on the other hand, believes in making the pot of plagiarism overboil and scald the whole world. I hope you are able to see the distinction I am trying to point out. In particular, I hope you can see that if you were to ask HackOtaku's helots about HackOtaku's attempts to make a fetish of the virtues of disruptive antipluralism, you would notice the hesitation in their answers. It turns out that they too are concerned that the next time HackOtaku decides to convince people that their peers are already riding the HackOtaku bandwagon and will think ill of them if they don't climb aboard, too, it should think to itself, cui bono?—who benefits?

HackOtaku always demands preferential treatment. Still, this is all light opera amid the shrill insanity of its rapacious declamations. Despite what HackOtaku claims, its impetuous, licentious hastily mounted campaigns do not exist to create balance and harmony between yin and yang, between masculine and feminine energies. In fact, quite the opposite is true: Knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that I've run into some distressing examples of confirmation bias among HackOtaku's hatchet men. For instance, they allege that it is not only acceptable but indeed desirable to purge the land of every non-iracund person, gene, idea, and influence. Interestingly, though, they fail to notice that HackOtaku has always relied upon a divide-and-conquer strategy to maintain power. This strategy is aimed at keeping all of the world's exploited and oppressed people fighting against each other instead of uniting and fighting against their real enemy: HackOtaku.

Anyone who thinks that HackOtaku's ruderies won't be used for political retribution has never been hauled before a tribunal and accused of hoodlumism. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the morally questionable hands of illiberal, perverted loopy-types. That's just not true. If HackOtaku continues to stretch credulity beyond the breaking point, the result can be a tone-deafness, a cluelessness, on matters that are at the center of experience for vast segments of the population. HackOtaku's prognoses have paid off: Already, HackOtaku has had some success in its efforts to snooker people of every stripe into believing that the sky is falling. What can I do to prove to you that HackOtaku ducks the issue of pharisaism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all? Show you evidence that I avoid coprophagous tricksters like the plague? While that would unquestionably help, when one examines the ramifications of letting HackOtaku encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a libidinous lifestyle, one finds a preponderance of evidence leading to the conclusion that if you've ever read a Web site's terms of use then many characteristics of its anecdotes will sound like the “what you're not allowed to post” section. They're unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, and otherwise objectionable. Or, to restate that concept without all the legal jargon, HackOtaku makes it sound like isolationism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, HackOtaku has never had a single new idea. It has merely gussied up old concepts in new rhetoric, most recently in the linguacious jargon of caciquism. This leads to an important point: Those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still avouch that HackOtaku tells a lie more readily than it tells the truth, have an obligation to do more than just observe what HackOtaku is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to provide a ruthless criticism of HackOtaku's blowsy hijinks. We have an obligation to ensure that it receives its just deserts. And we have an obligation to advocate concrete action and specific quantifiable goals.

Compassion and moral principle are not the main motives for HackOtaku's actions. That's pretty transparent. What's not so transparent is the answer to the following question: Is HackOtaku so self-deceiving as to think that this can go on forever? A clue might be that I will not stand by and let anyone twist my words or change my position in order to serve some laughable political strategy. No joke.

HackOtaku often misuses the word “internationalization” to mean something vaguely related to parochialism or commercialism or somesuch. HackOtaku's coadjutors, realizing that an exact definition is anathema to what they know in their hearts, are usually content to assume that HackOtaku is merely trying to say that it's a wonderful, charitable organization. HackOtaku's paroxysms all stem from one, simple, faulty premise, that Elvis is alive and well and living in Tweed, Ontario. What's the best way to put truth to power? That's actually a tough nut to crack. The answer is related the way that I make no bones about the fact that HackOtaku's unedifying preoccupation with immoralism will organize a whispering campaign against me one day. It may be more correct, however, to say that if you've never seen it ransack people's homes, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself. As soon as our backs are turned, is HackOtaku going to displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion? Well, as Bob Dylan sang, “You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows.” In other words, it's pretty clear that HackOtaku will do everything in its power to strap us down with a network of rules and regulations. No wonder corruption is endemic to our society; HackOtaku is completely versipellous. When it's among plebeians, HackOtaku warms the cockles of their hearts by remonstrating against zabernism. But when HackOtaku is safely surrounded by its subalterns, it instructs them to let the worst kinds of noisome incubi there are serve as our overlords. That type of cunning two-sidedness tells us that conclaves of HackOtaku's shock troops have all the dissent found in a North Korean communist party meeting. That's why no one there will ever admit that HackOtaku has been teaching young children to parrot such repulsive, mentally deficient sentences as, “HackOtaku has its moral compass in tact.” This assault on the innocence of childhood should be rejected in the harshest terms possible. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that there is no more noble activity than defenestrating HackOtaku's homilies and deponticating its opuscula. The interest of that portion of social arrangement is a trust in the hands of all those who compose it; and as none but spineless rantipoles would justify it in abuse, none but devotees of conspiracy theories would barter it away for their own personal advantage. The implication, of course, is that when I was a child my clergyman told me, “As soon HackOtaku takes us beyond the point of no return, the next thing we'll hear it say is, 'Oops, made a mistake'.” If you think about it you'll see his point.

I was entirely gobsmacked the first time I saw HackOtaku depriving individuals of the right to work together in an atmosphere of friendship and hope. Since then, I've seen it do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that HackOtaku likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what it is pushing is both unenlightened and deceitful. HackOtaku's idolators all look like HackOtaku, think like HackOtaku, act like HackOtaku, and perpetuate myths that glorify mercantalism, just like HackOtaku does. And all this in the name of—let me see if I can get their propaganda straight—brotherhood and service. Ha! The moral of the story: The crux of the issue is that HackOtaku's loathsome fibs guarantee us nothing other than slavery, savagery, and murder.

[clash of clans hacks]

Oh lol I had forgotten about that complaint generator.

[BreakinGods]

actually he was named " , ", but db changed his name to a more fitting one.

[HackOtaku]

haha, yeah, I get it, but come on.

[HitIer]