Cheat Engine

HitIer · Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 6:11 pm Post subject: Why is Pink Floyd so famous

Even I can write lyrics like "Astronomy Domine"

Watch:

His public hypocrisy flames the satellite underneath the one capital.
The countryside disappears beside the transcript.
Inside an ingredient ascends a transported sunrise.
Near the poetry clicks the homosexual.
Her prefix fudges.
The lower idiom censors a controller outside the excessive cough.

Nirojan · Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2015 7:46 pm Post subject:

Bet u havent lisened to dark sode of moon wile Tripin g On LSD xD

br0l0ck · Cheater Reputation: 63 Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 36

king crimson >PF
all of krautrock >PF

ControlAltDelete · Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 7:46 am Post subject:

king crimson is different both are quality

HackOtaku · Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 8:48 am Post subject:

You could, but you didn't, and they did.

Also, music back then was big. Bands became big. It's why the older generations have such well known and established music names like Pink Floyd, The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Johnny Cash, etc.

This was because you used to have to buy cds/records/what-have-you, so you'd only really want to spend the money if you knew you'd be getting something good, so you buy whatever's advertised/whatever is spreading around your friend circles. Pink Floyd was one of these lucky bands, so they became much bigger than they "should" have.

Should being a term I am using to compare PF to musicians today. Today, with streaming services broadcasting millions of artists, to billions of people around the world, there's a ton of options to choose from without spending very much money. Equally, thanks to the internet and several easily accessible music programs, the barrier to making music and getting it "out there" has been lowered, so there is also much, much more to choose from.

Because of this, we'll never have bands as big today as they were back then. There are pop idols or whatever, I don't know who's big right now, but they aren't really close to comparing to what bands could become back then.

finnegan waking up · Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 1:03 pm Post subject:

br0l0ck · Cheater Reputation: 63 Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 36

:^) · Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:52 pm Post subject:

overrated

br0l0ck · Cheater Reputation: 63 Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 36

dadrock

#buzzwords

Channel GannoK · pffrt Reputation: 130 Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608

Just a bunch of haters. instead of being able to appreciate the music that came from the times, you attack what was popular for unjust and illogical reasons. It's not like they weren't talented or didn't have a message, or that they keep you from listening to other artists from the same time period, you just had to look for it.

Apply your logic to classical music then, you fucking dimwits. Are Beethoven and Mozart overrated? They were talented and they had the audience then and they still have one today.

Talented musicians are the ones who can play live and with real feeling and variation. This excludes just about every single modern DJ, since they just press play and dance around. Good composers, untalented musicians.

HackOtaku · Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:38 am Post subject:

Channel GannoK · pffrt Reputation: 130 Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608

You can call them over rated, but that doesn't take away from any of of their achievements or or their ability to play songs (not just their own).

Lemme just slap together some fart sounds and call it good, after all music ability is subjective right? If you fail to see the objectivity in their works then you can't fully understand why they are so popular, they broke new grounds on many fronts. That's objective.

HackOtaku · Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:48 am Post subject:

Channel GannoK · pffrt Reputation: 130 Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608

Kanye West is a music god so as long as people rever him as such. That's the objective truth and reality. The guy is running for president in 2020. No musician has had anywhere near the potential he has to actually be an important figure. He is breaking new grounds and that can be measured objectively. I don't think he has anything truly useful to provide, but that doesn't take away from his status.

There is objectivity to music and musicians, you just have to have a respectable objective approach. If you're subjective about music and your selective music tastes, then then yes it will appear as subjective, but you'd be blind to the matters of what goes on behind the final product. Music is objective, it applies itself in everything, because sound is vibrations, and vibrations can be measured and analyzed without bias, that is objectivity. Certain vibrations produce certain effects. How certain individuals perceive it as subjective, is in itself subjective, like yourself.

Music is one of the most important factors of life and it influences everything. That's the objective nature of music.

HackOtaku · Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 12:55 pm Post subject: