| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Slugsnack
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 71
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1857
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:57 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
it's around 5$ per month but it would be useless because public wifi (whether free or not) is not even close to as widespread as cellular. you have a problem that you can not tell the difference between where you live and everywhere else. even if it is the case that free wifi is available in 100% area of your city, it is a retarded assumption to make that this applies to another state in the same country let alone different countries all together
it's funny that i have to explain these things and dumb it down a billion levels so you can understand. everyone else understands the implication of cellular data without an in-depth explanation with 800 analogies. you're a slow learner and an exceedingly stupid one at that
Last edited by Slugsnack on Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:58 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cryoma
Member of the Year
![]() Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Slugsnack wrote: | | it's around 5$ per month but it would be useless because public wifi (whether free or not) is not even close to as widespread as cellular. you have a problem that you can not tell the difference between where you live and everywhere else. even if it is the case that free wifi is available in 100% area of your city, it is a retarded assumption to make that this applies to another state in the same country let alone different countries all together |
I wasn't assuming that other countries have widespread wifi, I was just ignoring the ones that don't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slugsnack
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 71
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1857
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| you're a fucking idiot. any countries with widespread wifi is in the minority. if you had any, common sense could have told you that
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma
Member of the Year
![]() Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Slugsnack wrote: | | you're a fucking idiot. any countries with widespread wifi is in the minority. if you had any, common sense could have told you that |
this from you
oh my sides
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Slugsnack
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 71
Joined: 24 Jan 2007
Posts: 1857
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| don't post again, you ignorant imbecile
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma
Member of the Year
![]() Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ok
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
InternetIsSeriousBusiness
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 8
Joined: 12 Jul 2010
Posts: 1268
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Butters wrote: | | >not wanting the faster standard |
How can it be a standard if the term itself doesn't have a standard? 4g is really a cliche that marketers toss around to make it seem faster than 3g.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20028622-266.html
_________________
FLAME FLAME FLAME!!!@@@ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Butters
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 71
Joined: 17 Mar 2007
Posts: 1373
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| init wrote: | | Butters wrote: | | >not wanting the faster standard |
How can it be a standard if the term itself doesn't have a standard? 4g is really a cliche that marketers toss around to make it seem faster than 3g.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20028622-266.html |
4G is a real term to define a real standard of connectivity based on several things such as data rates (need 100mbit/s or some shit to qualify as 4G). Whilst it's true that carriers 6 months ago branded their products as 4G when it actually didn't meet the requirements, that doesn't mean that 4G is only a marketing term.
Is almost everyone on this forum these days a moron?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aniblaze
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 138
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 1757
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2012 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Butters wrote: | | init wrote: | | Butters wrote: | | >not wanting the faster standard |
How can it be a standard if the term itself doesn't have a standard? 4g is really a cliche that marketers toss around to make it seem faster than 3g.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-30686_3-20028622-266.html |
4G is a real term to define a real standard of connectivity based on several things such as data rates (need 100mbit/s or some shit to qualify as 4G). Whilst it's true that carriers 6 months ago branded their products as 4G when it actually didn't meet the requirements, that doesn't mean that 4G is only a marketing term.
Is almost everyone on this forum these days a moron? |
Not me, I'm a banana.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
