Cheat Engine

[meme'd]

Can somebody write me 1-2 paragraphs on why superman sucks? Thanks.

[Dark‮&#8238]

[meme'd]

No gen pls.

I would like to take this opportunity to raise ultra-juvenile bigamists out of their cultural misery and lead them to the national community as a valuable, united factor. Before I get moving here, let me point out that we must undeniably take the initiative to keep our courage up. A compossible option is to fight Sterling Archer hammer and tong. If we follow that approach, however, we must bear in mind that Sterling knows that performing an occasional act of charity will make some people forgive—or at least overlook—all of his ignominious excesses. My take on the matter is that it's possible that he doesn't realize this because he has been ingrained with so much of absolutism's propaganda. If that's the case, I recommend that we change the minds of those who develop a credible pretext to forcibly silence his foes.

Knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that someone once said to me, "We must be uncompromising and unequivocal when it comes to lending support to the thesis that even Sterling's horoscope says he's prolix." This phrase struck me so forcefully that I have often used it since. As for me, I have no bombs, no planes, no artillery, and no terrorist plots. But I do have weapons and tactics that are far more deadly: pure light and simple truth.

Some people have compared vilipensive patrioteers to unmannerly porn stars. I would like to take the comparison one step further: Sterling claims that snobbism brings one closer to nirvana. Whether that's true or not, his evidence is corrupted by a vast amount of nonsense and outright fraud. Before we can further discuss Sterling's claim we must acknowledge that Sterling makes a living out of nepotism. I call this tactic of his "entrepreneurial nepotism". Sterling and his companions have definitely raised entrepreneurial nepotism to a fine art by using it to leave behind a wake of homophobic reaction.

I aver that there are in fact many people who possess the intelligence, wisdom, talent, and ability to chastise Sterling for not doing any research before spouting off. My goal is to locate those people and encourage them to help me raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives. Mad schmucks have increasingly been breaking the mind and spirit, castrating the character, and killing the career of anyone whose ideas he deems to be squalid. Sterling has a lot to answer for in regard to that.

If you observe some repetition in my statements, it is because such repetition is needed for clarity and emphasis as I look at our situation realistically and from a viewpoint that takes in the whole picture. Investigators who have spent many years attempting to penetrate the dark recesses of Sterling's treacherous underworld frequently conclude that the same pattern of guilt-by-association practiced by Sterling's shock troops can be found in Sterling's cajoleries. It's a pity. Before Sterling spews any more psychoanalytical drivel, let me assure him that he occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth.

Imagine people everywhere embracing Sterling's claim that it is his moral imperative to sap people's moral stamina. The idea defies the imagination. Sterling's shell games are a stentorian form of thuggery. Even more remarkable, I once overheard Sterling say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Sterling said that the world is crying out to labor beneath his firm but benevolent heel. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that he is an interesting character. On the one hand, Sterling likes to capitalize on our needs and vulnerabilities. But on the other hand, I've tried to explain to his maladroit winged monkeys that only negligent tax cheats ever maintain that his antics are "grandly compelling", "articulate and persuasive", or "a vital contribution". As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that Sterling's fork-tongued, disrespectful game of chess—the naive chess of neopaganism—has continued for far too long. It's time to checkmate this destructive, oppressive renegade and show him that it is through his detestable folly and selfishness that mephitic twits have been stripping people of their rights to free expression and individuality. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that the world can be happy only when his band is given full rein, then there is unequivocally no hope for you.

Given this context, we need to return to the idea that motivated this letter: We must overcome the fears that beset us every day of our lives. We must overcome the fear that Sterling will resort to ad hominem attacks on me and my family. And to overcome these fears, we must demand a thoughtful analysis and resolution of our problems with Sterling. In this land which has befriended the worst classes of rotten caitiffs there are, he has conspired, plotted, undermined, prostituted, and corrupted, and—hiding to this hour behind the braver screen of wishy-washy, brutish extremists—dares to contrive and scheme the death of every principle that has protected him.

In recent months, Sterling's partiality has been all the more glaring, particularly in light of his claim that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic pink pixie dust over everything that he considers rancorous or scornful. But there's the rub; anyone—you or I or a Martian who just arrived in a flying saucer—who wants to lay the groundwork for an upcoming attempt to denounce his quips should realize that he demands obeisance from his backers. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Sterling forces them to clear-cut ancient forest lands. I don't wish to psychologize here, but Sterling's editorials are a mere cavil, a mere scarecrow, one of the last shifts of a desperate and dying cause. In order to understand the motivation behind Sterling's equivocations it is important first to tell it like it is. It is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to reveal the nature and activity of Sterling's followers and expose their inner contexts as well as their ultimate final aims.

The name Sterling Archer has become nearly synonymous with incomprehensible evil. It's also true that his assertion that truth is merely a social construct serves only to illustrate his ignorance and poorly hidden bigotry, but that'll have to be a subject for another letter. This is not a question of pharisaism or Machiavellianism. Rather, it is a question about how much of what Sterling writes is excruciatingly hard to read. If he actually wants to write something meaningful, he should stick to the basics: Declare an argument; make supporting statements related to the topic; and draw a conclusion that isn't off on some wild tangent from the original hypothesis. For instance, rather than make the factually unsupported claim that Sterling can bring about peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity through violence, deception, oppression, exploitation, graft, and theft, it would be better to argue that we must set the record straight. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.

Who is Sterling to decide what is morally acceptable for us and what is not? I apologize if what I'm saying sounds painfully obvious, painfully self-evident. However, it is so extremely important that I must really say it. He likes to cite poll results that "prove" that we can trust him not to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of licentious conspiracies. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if the past is any indication of the future, Sterling will once again attempt to require schoolchildren to be taught that he has the authority to issue licenses for practicing rowdyism. What I had wanted for this letter was to write an analysis of Sterling Archer's put-downs—not an exhortation or a shrill denunciation but an analysis. I hope I have succeeded at that.

[Phox]

I could easily do that for you. I've read hundreds of superman comics. What's in it for me, though? Do I get credit?

[meme'd]

[:^)]

a song to help

Link

[.....]

[meme'd]