 |
Cheat Engine The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Evil_Intentions Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | You just keep proving my point don't you? Yea they have the same definition, but people apply different meanings to them on their own.
The "love" of my dog, and the "love" of my parents are the same word aren't they? But I'M the one who holds the meaning behind them. If you criticize my word choice in the OP based on how long we've been dating without any knowledge about the underlying meaning of the relationship,you're wrong. So now you've stepped into hypocrite territory. You're impossible to talk to and you sit agreeing with me in the past two replies while trying to go against me. Continuing this argument is a waste because I have already proven my point, and now you've proven my point too. |
Separate points, I agree with some, and oppose others.
And it's very apparent you didn't look up anything about the science of attraction , or you'd know it's near impossible to genuinely love someone after 5 months without extreme circumstances. |
Honestly, if you sit there googling the science of attraction and bs like that, good luck too you, that's all I have to say. I could trust my ex with anything, and tell her anything, I would be there for her no matter what. She made me genuinely happy, and we were extremely close. I can use whatever word I please to describe that relationship, I chose love.
Good luck basing your new relationship on the "science of attraction."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Fish Expert Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 114 Location: Ohio bitch
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | You just keep proving my point don't you? Yea they have the same definition, but people apply different meanings to them on their own.
The "love" of my dog, and the "love" of my parents are the same word aren't they? But I'M the one who holds the meaning behind them. If you criticize my word choice in the OP based on how long we've been dating without any knowledge about the underlying meaning of the relationship,you're wrong. So now you've stepped into hypocrite territory. You're impossible to talk to and you sit agreeing with me in the past two replies while trying to go against me. Continuing this argument is a waste because I have already proven my point, and now you've proven my point too. |
Separate points, I agree with some, and oppose others.
And it's very apparent you didn't look up anything about the science of attraction , or you'd know it's near impossible to genuinely love someone after 5 months without extreme circumstances. |
Honestly, if you sit there googling the science of attraction and bs like that, good luck too you, that's all I have to say. I could trust my ex with anything, and tell her anything, I would be there for her no matter what. She made me genuinely happy, and we were extremely close. I can use whatever word I please to describe that relationship, I chose love.
Good luck basing your new relationship on the "science of attraction." |
It explains how bonds are made in the brain, and why bonds take time to form. It's obvious that you're stupid if you think you're an exception to human brain chemistry.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antagonist Cheater
Reputation: 29
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 48 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Me too, I envy and crave for long lasting and mature relationship. Not just some shit where you just hold hands and change Facebook status. That's probably why I'm single, because I expect too much from people my age where having relationships is just for fun. Oh well.
_________________
 
| tough guy talix wrote: | | i've had it with your shit. fuck outta here |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evil_Intentions Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | You just keep proving my point don't you? Yea they have the same definition, but people apply different meanings to them on their own.
The "love" of my dog, and the "love" of my parents are the same word aren't they? But I'M the one who holds the meaning behind them. If you criticize my word choice in the OP based on how long we've been dating without any knowledge about the underlying meaning of the relationship,you're wrong. So now you've stepped into hypocrite territory. You're impossible to talk to and you sit agreeing with me in the past two replies while trying to go against me. Continuing this argument is a waste because I have already proven my point, and now you've proven my point too. |
Separate points, I agree with some, and oppose others.
And it's very apparent you didn't look up anything about the science of attraction , or you'd know it's near impossible to genuinely love someone after 5 months without extreme circumstances. |
Honestly, if you sit there googling the science of attraction and bs like that, good luck too you, that's all I have to say. I could trust my ex with anything, and tell her anything, I would be there for her no matter what. She made me genuinely happy, and we were extremely close. I can use whatever word I please to describe that relationship, I chose love.
Good luck basing your new relationship on the "science of attraction." |
It explains how bonds are made in the brain, and why bonds take time to form. It's obvious that you're stupid if you think you're an exception to human brain chemistry. |
All I'm saying is good luck.
"HONEY, GREAT NEWS! It's been two years, we can say we love each other now and be right according to science!"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Fish Expert Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 114 Location: Ohio bitch
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | You just keep proving my point don't you? Yea they have the same definition, but people apply different meanings to them on their own.
The "love" of my dog, and the "love" of my parents are the same word aren't they? But I'M the one who holds the meaning behind them. If you criticize my word choice in the OP based on how long we've been dating without any knowledge about the underlying meaning of the relationship,you're wrong. So now you've stepped into hypocrite territory. You're impossible to talk to and you sit agreeing with me in the past two replies while trying to go against me. Continuing this argument is a waste because I have already proven my point, and now you've proven my point too. |
Separate points, I agree with some, and oppose others.
And it's very apparent you didn't look up anything about the science of attraction , or you'd know it's near impossible to genuinely love someone after 5 months without extreme circumstances. |
Honestly, if you sit there googling the science of attraction and bs like that, good luck too you, that's all I have to say. I could trust my ex with anything, and tell her anything, I would be there for her no matter what. She made me genuinely happy, and we were extremely close. I can use whatever word I please to describe that relationship, I chose love.
Good luck basing your new relationship on the "science of attraction." |
It explains how bonds are made in the brain, and why bonds take time to form. It's obvious that you're stupid if you think you're an exception to human brain chemistry. |
All I'm saying is good luck.
"HONEY, GREAT NEWS! It's been two years, we can say we love each other now and be right according to science!" |
You still seem to be unable to understand the science's application to this discussion.
I'm convinced you're in the 13-15 age range based upon your unwillingness to admit that you're wrong.
That, or you have something wrong with your brain or have mommy issues.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evil_Intentions Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | You just keep proving my point don't you? Yea they have the same definition, but people apply different meanings to them on their own.
The "love" of my dog, and the "love" of my parents are the same word aren't they? But I'M the one who holds the meaning behind them. If you criticize my word choice in the OP based on how long we've been dating without any knowledge about the underlying meaning of the relationship,you're wrong. So now you've stepped into hypocrite territory. You're impossible to talk to and you sit agreeing with me in the past two replies while trying to go against me. Continuing this argument is a waste because I have already proven my point, and now you've proven my point too. |
Separate points, I agree with some, and oppose others.
And it's very apparent you didn't look up anything about the science of attraction , or you'd know it's near impossible to genuinely love someone after 5 months without extreme circumstances. |
Honestly, if you sit there googling the science of attraction and bs like that, good luck too you, that's all I have to say. I could trust my ex with anything, and tell her anything, I would be there for her no matter what. She made me genuinely happy, and we were extremely close. I can use whatever word I please to describe that relationship, I chose love.
Good luck basing your new relationship on the "science of attraction." |
It explains how bonds are made in the brain, and why bonds take time to form. It's obvious that you're stupid if you think you're an exception to human brain chemistry. |
All I'm saying is good luck.
"HONEY, GREAT NEWS! It's been two years, we can say we love each other now and be right according to science!" |
You still seem to be unable to understand the science's application to this discussion.
I'm convinced you're in the 13-15 age range based upon your unwillingness to admit that you're wrong. |
Nope, 17
"Oh hey baby, it's now been 8 months, I can scientifically start feeling deeply attracted to you!"
"Wasn't that two months ago?"
"Oh no, that was only slightly attracted, didn't you google the science of attraction?"
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Fish Expert Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 114 Location: Ohio bitch
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | You just keep proving my point don't you? Yea they have the same definition, but people apply different meanings to them on their own.
The "love" of my dog, and the "love" of my parents are the same word aren't they? But I'M the one who holds the meaning behind them. If you criticize my word choice in the OP based on how long we've been dating without any knowledge about the underlying meaning of the relationship,you're wrong. So now you've stepped into hypocrite territory. You're impossible to talk to and you sit agreeing with me in the past two replies while trying to go against me. Continuing this argument is a waste because I have already proven my point, and now you've proven my point too. |
Separate points, I agree with some, and oppose others.
And it's very apparent you didn't look up anything about the science of attraction , or you'd know it's near impossible to genuinely love someone after 5 months without extreme circumstances. |
Honestly, if you sit there googling the science of attraction and bs like that, good luck too you, that's all I have to say. I could trust my ex with anything, and tell her anything, I would be there for her no matter what. She made me genuinely happy, and we were extremely close. I can use whatever word I please to describe that relationship, I chose love.
Good luck basing your new relationship on the "science of attraction." |
It explains how bonds are made in the brain, and why bonds take time to form. It's obvious that you're stupid if you think you're an exception to human brain chemistry. |
All I'm saying is good luck.
"HONEY, GREAT NEWS! It's been two years, we can say we love each other now and be right according to science!" |
You still seem to be unable to understand the science's application to this discussion.
I'm convinced you're in the 13-15 age range based upon your unwillingness to admit that you're wrong. |
Nope, 17
"Oh hey baby, it's now been 8 months, I can scientifically start feeling deeply attracted to you!"
"Wasn't that two months ago?"
"Oh no, that was only slightly attracted, didn't you google the science of attraction?" |
So you have a brain problem or mommy issues.
You prove again and again that you're too stupid to understand how the science applies to the attraction.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evil_Intentions Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I just find it funny how insecure you are that you rely on science to direct your relationship.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antagonist Cheater
Reputation: 29
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 48 Location: California
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Love occurs usally on if the person you are attracted to shares the same aspects as you do, if she/he benefits from your personal needs, and sometimes if they look like your mom/dad(opposite from your gender). At least, that's how psychologist defines love.
_________________
 
| tough guy talix wrote: | | i've had it with your shit. fuck outta here |
Last edited by Antagonist on Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:57 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Fish Expert Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 114 Location: Ohio bitch
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazekeil wrote: | | I just find it funny how insecure you are that you rely on science to direct your relationship. |
I just find it funny that you're backed into a corner and rely on ad hominem to try to put up an argument.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evil_Intentions Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | I just find it funny how insecure you are that you rely on science to direct your relationship. |
I just find it funny that you're backed into a corner and rely on ad hominem to try to put up an argument. |
But I'm not arguing anymore, I told you that a few replies ago. All you're doing is barking at a rock. Now I'm just sitting back and enjoying the little show you're putting on.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Fish Expert Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 114 Location: Ohio bitch
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | I just find it funny how insecure you are that you rely on science to direct your relationship. |
I just find it funny that you're backed into a corner and rely on ad hominem to try to put up an argument. |
But I'm not arguing anymore, I told you that a few replies ago. All you're doing is barking at a rock. Now I'm just sitting back and enjoying the little show you're putting on. |
You don't have an argument any more. That's why you're not arguing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evil_Intentions Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | I just find it funny how insecure you are that you rely on science to direct your relationship. |
I just find it funny that you're backed into a corner and rely on ad hominem to try to put up an argument. |
But I'm not arguing anymore, I told you that a few replies ago. All you're doing is barking at a rock. Now I'm just sitting back and enjoying the little show you're putting on. |
You don't have an argument any more. That's why you're not arguing. |
No, you proved my argument already, which is why I'm not arguing.
Well technically now we're arguing about arguing, or rather who's arguing, the subargument being what the argument exactly is.... savvy?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Fish Expert Cheater
Reputation: 3
Joined: 11 Aug 2008 Posts: 114 Location: Ohio bitch
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | I just find it funny how insecure you are that you rely on science to direct your relationship. |
I just find it funny that you're backed into a corner and rely on ad hominem to try to put up an argument. |
But I'm not arguing anymore, I told you that a few replies ago. All you're doing is barking at a rock. Now I'm just sitting back and enjoying the little show you're putting on. |
You don't have an argument any more. That's why you're not arguing. |
No, you proved my argument already, which is why I'm not arguing.
Well technically now we're arguing about arguing, or rather who's arguing, the subargument being what the argument exactly is.... savvy? |
How did I prove that your childish and immature opinion on love is right?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Evil_Intentions Expert Cheater
Reputation: 65
Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 214
|
Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | The Fish wrote: | | Kazekeil wrote: | | I just find it funny how insecure you are that you rely on science to direct your relationship. |
I just find it funny that you're backed into a corner and rely on ad hominem to try to put up an argument. |
But I'm not arguing anymore, I told you that a few replies ago. All you're doing is barking at a rock. Now I'm just sitting back and enjoying the little show you're putting on. |
You don't have an argument any more. That's why you're not arguing. |
No, you proved my argument already, which is why I'm not arguing.
Well technically now we're arguing about arguing, or rather who's arguing, the subargument being what the argument exactly is.... savvy? |
How did I prove that your childish and immature opinion on love is right? |
With your ignorant "big and colossal" post. Had it not been for that, you may have been able to continue for a few posts more. And is basing something that's emotion based and opinion oriented on some science tests really that grown up and "mature?" Do you plan on standing in a circle of acquaintances where the conversation is something as follows:
"Eh, Gerald, how long have you been seeing that Venessa girl?"
"Why about 92 days on last count."
"Oh splendid, only 6.2 more days until you get to feel physically attracted."
"Oh I know, I've marked it on my calendar. Seems like just yesterday I was able to feel strong mental attraction, but it's actually just been 23 days."
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|