Cheat Engine

[Evil_Intentions]

the hell does this mean. I haven't been on cheat engine since last summer, and noone used it then.

[Channel GannoK]

Please. Just stop.

[bfsdbsdfbdsfb]

It means MVQ.

[Evil_Intentions]

[Maes]

My face when.
*Followed by a picture of a face for that particular use of mfw.*

[Evil_Intentions]

[InternetIsSeriousBusiness]

[bfsdbsdfbdsfb]

Over the past few weeks, I've learned to look past Evil_Intentions's stiff-necked declamations. I've learned to look past some of the dotty things Evil_Intentions has said. I've even learned to look past his attempts to welsh on all kinds of agreements. But I cannot stay silent about Evil_Intentions's incomprehensible and unforgivable audacity regarding a specific event that recently occurred. I want to share this with you because teenagers who want to shock their parents sometimes maintain—with a straight face—that Evil_Intentions is merely trying to make this world a better place in which to live. Fortunately, most parents don't fall for this fraud because they know that if Evil_Intentions can give us all a succinct and infallible argument proving that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have, I will personally deliver his Nobel Prize for Crass Rhetoric. In the meantime, Evil_Intentions does, occasionally, make a valid point. But when he says that if he kicks us in the teeth we'll then lick his toes and beg for another kick, that's where the facts end and the ludicrousness begins.

If there's one thing that Evil_Intentions is good at, it's spreading the germs of hatred, of discord and jealously, of dissolution and decomposition. Please don't ask me to violate the basic tenets of journalism and scholarship. I simply can't do that. Evil_Intentions likes to posture as a guardian of virtue and manners. However, when it comes right down to it, what he is pushing is both temperamental and empty-headed.

It's fine to realize that Evil_Intentions wouldn't hesitate to sacrifice his most loyal chargés d'affaires if it made it even slightly easier for him to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to give our young people the values that will inspire them to navigate a safe path between the Scylla of Evil_Intentions's tasteless fairy tales and the Charybdis of racism, but it's more important to know that Evil_Intentions maintains that either an open party with unlimited access to alcohol can't possibly outgrow the host's ability to manage the crowd or that he has a "special" perspective on antinomianism that carries with it a "special" right to reap a harvest of death. Evil_Intentions denies any other possibility. I used to think that soulless nutcases were the most besotted people on the planet but now I know that over time, Evil_Intentions's remonstrations have progressed from being merely blockish to being superblockish, hyperblockish, and recently ultrablockish. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megablockish. Under the guise of stimulating debate and illuminating diverse perspectives, Evil_Intentions's metanarratives actually take the robes of political power off the shoulders of the few honest people who wear them and put them upon the shoulders of the most uncongenial bottom-feeders I've ever seen. To cap that off, I have some of Evil_Intentions's writings in front of me right now. In one of them, Evil_Intentions maintains that principles don't matter. If you don't find that shocking then consider that I must admit that I've read only a small fraction of Evil_Intentions's writings. (As a well-known aphorism states, it is not necessary to eat all of an apple to learn that it is rotten.) Nevertheless, I've read enough of Evil_Intentions's writings to know that Evil_Intentions's rabid devotees wring their hands with angst at the thought of someone like me brushing away the cobwebs of materialism. But I digress. Evil_Intentions's tricks are based on hate. Hate, interventionism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life.

Call me foolhardy if you'd like; I will still do everything in my power to initiate meaningful change. Then, I will announce to the world that on the issue of exhibitionism, Evil_Intentions is wrong again. Sure, he is every bit as tendentious as the worst classes of unruly dweebs there are. But I'd peg the odds at about six to one that Evil_Intentions will take away our sense of community and leave us morally adrift faster than you can say "epididymodeferential". If I'm wrong, I promise that I'll gladly jump in the lake.

Evil_Intentions's warnings have created a treacherous, offensive universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that cell-phone towers are in fact covert mind-control devices that use scalar waves to beam images into people's brains while they sleep. Only within this universe does it make sense to divert us from proclaiming what in our innermost conviction is absolutely necessary. And, only if we step back and consider the problem of his memoirs in the larger picture of popular culture imagery can we destroy this sneaky, audacious universe of his and draw a picture of what we conceive of under the word "counterintelligence".

I have two words for Evil_Intentions: Grow up! When he tells us that the majority of twisted ragamuffins are heroes, if not saints, he somehow fails to mention that he wouldn't know a new idea if it hit him over the head. He fails to mention that any effort to negotiate with him or appease him is akin to spitting into a hurricane to quiet its fury. And he fails to mention that many people are worried that he will make today's oppressiveness look like grade-school work compared to what he has planned for the future before you know it. I don't like to speculate on uncertain things, but I will say that Evil_Intentions is stepping over the line when he attempts to let advanced weaponry fall into the hands of the worst types of horny ignoramuses there are—way over the line. Maybe it's not fair to call Evil_Intentions's vassals "bilious" just because they fabricate all sorts of bestial, ad hoc rules and regulations, but remember that I recently heard Evil_Intentions tell a bunch of people that power, politics, and privilege should prevail over the rule of law. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text.

Let no one say that anyone who disagrees with Evil_Intentions is ultimately lazy. No, this is crabby jingoism and must be regarded as an attempt to cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it. He says that he knows the "right" way to read Plato, Maimonides, and Machiavelli. You know, I don't think I have heard a less factually based statement in my entire life. I surely hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Evil_Intentions does any real damage. Or is it already too late? I hardly know. But I will stake the immortality of my soul that Evil_Intentions contends that the future of the entire world rests in his hands. What planet is he from? The planet Muddleheaded? Perhaps the answer is best saved for another letter. Let me simply note that the costs of Evil_Intentions's wheelings and dealings outweigh their benefits. It may be more correct, however, to say that by allowing him to drain our hope and enthusiasm, we are allowing him to play puppet master.

If we were to let Evil_Intentions get away with befuddling the public and making sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion, that would be a gross miscarriage of justice. He has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that his perspective is that his smears are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people. My perspective, in contrast, is that when I hear Evil_Intentions say that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day, I have to wonder about him. Is he thoroughly rancorous? Is he simply being lackadaisical? Or is he merely embracing a delusion in which he must believe in order to continue believing in himself? Apparently, even know-it-all Evil_Intentions doesn't know the answer to that one. It wouldn't matter much if he did, given that the struggle to expand people's understanding of his viperine fulminations takes center stage these days, both locally and nationwide. Stated differently, far too many people tolerate Evil_Intentions's roorbacks as long as they're presented in small, seemingly harmless doses. What these people fail to realize, however, is that if you think that Evil_Intentions is a refined gentleman with the soundest education and morals you can imagine then you're suffering from very serious nearsightedness. You're focusing too much on what Evil_Intentions wants you to see and failing to observe many other things of much greater importance such as that he just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to evade responsibility."

Do I want Evil_Intentions to perpetuate the myth that he answers to no one? No, thank you very much; I, not being one of the many pushy antagonists of this world, would much rather dole out acerbic criticism of Evil_Intentions and his phalanx of lecherous lackeys. I need your help if I'm ever to face our problems realistically, get to the root of our problems, and be determined to solve them. "But I'm only one person," you might protest. "What difference can I make?" The answer is: a lot more than you think. You see, Evil_Intentions has the nerve to call those of us who investigate his refractory, supercilious principles, ideals, and objectives "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that Evil_Intentions's skills are generally used to exploit, abuse, and exert power. Am I aware of how Evil_Intentions will react when he reads that last sentence? Yes. Do I care? No, because if the past is any indication of the future, he will once again attempt to visit misery and havoc upon countless millions.

Far be it for me to cultivate an unhealthy sense of victimhood. My wish to be polite notwithstanding, I must remark that Evil_Intentions's assertions are lawless, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements. But you knew that already. So let me add that I call upon Evil_Intentions to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to perpetuate harmful stereotypes. He focuses on feelings rather than facts. Sure, Evil_Intentions attempts to twist and distort facts to justify his feelings, but that just goes to show that there are two things we need to do right away. First, we need to free people from the fetters of simplism's poisonous embrace. Second—and this is critical so get out your highlighter—we need to begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. Once those two things are accomplished we can finally start discussing how if his drones had even an ounce of integrity they would delegitimize Evil_Intentions. In a nutshell, the older Evil_Intentions gets, the more ruthless he becomes.

[Channel GannoK]

I'm certain you did not type any of that

[bfsdbsdfbdsfb]

[Evil_Intentions]

http://www.pakin.org/complaint

[InternetIsSeriousBusiness]

[Evil_Intentions]

Before Orange-Kun McFag starts ripping tendons and ligaments with his typical knee-jerk reaction to my letters, he should realize that he writes really long and boring letters. So let's begin, quite properly, with a brief look at the historical development of the problem, of its attempted solutions, and of the eternal argument about it. I used to agree completely with those who claimed that his bilious plaints cater to the lowest common denominator. Interestingly, my views on this have changed slightly as I have learned more about human motivation and human behavior. Now I believe that Orange-Kun has the nerve to call those of us who protect our peace, privacy, and safety "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that I want nothing more—or less—than to avoid the extremes of a pessimistic naturalism and an optimistic humanism by combining the truths of both. To that task I have consecrated my life and I invite you to do likewise.

Orange-Kun counts what I call disruptive ingrates as his friends. Unfortunately for him, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that I challenge Orange-Kun to point out any text in this letter that proposes that his shiftless flock is a benign and charitable agency. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. We need to enlighten the mind of Man and improve him as a rational, moral, and social being. Why? Because of what's at stake: literally everything.

Whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to build a better world, a cleaner world, a safer world, and a saner world. Now, why all this fuss about a few unconscionable reports? Simply put, it's because I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that Orange-Kun carries nothing but hatred and destruction in his heart. What I mean is that I'm not writing this letter for your entertainment. I'm not even writing it for your education. I'm writing it for our very survival.

Several things Orange-Kun has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how everyone and everything discriminates against him—including the writing on the bathroom stalls. He sees himself as a postmodern equivalent of Marx's proletariat, revolutionizing the world by wresting it from its oppressors (viz., those who deal with Orange-Kun's obtrusive denunciations on a case-by-case basis). Orange-Kun wants to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a nerdy, illogical world to begin a new life in the shadows of fanaticism. But what if the tables were turned? How would Orange-Kun like that?

I find that some of Orange-Kun's choices of words in his complaints would not have been mine. For example, I would have substituted "directionless" for "indistinguishability" and "pesky" for "disdenominationalize." Orange-Kun is always prating about how the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids. (He used to say that his musings are our final line of defense against tyrrany, but the evidence is too contrary so he's given up on that score.) To ignore this issue is to condemn children to a life of drugs, gangs, drinking, rape, incest, verbal abuse, physical abuse, and a number of other horrors—and Orange-Kun knows it. Thanks to his satanic op-ed pieces, crime and lawlessness amount prurient, infantile carpetbaggers is now far more rife than ever before. And if that seems like a modest claim, I disagree. It's the most radical claim of all.

Ask yourself: Why aren't our children being warned about Orange-Kun in school? I bet you'll answer the same way that I did because we both know that the key to Orange-Kun's soul is his longing for the effortless, irresponsible, automatic consciousness of an animal. He dreads the necessity, the risk, and the responsibility of rational cognition. As a result, Orange-Kun's intimations are based on hate. Hate, alarmism, and an intolerance of another viewpoint, another way of life. Grumpy, inimical dunderheads have exerted care always to use high-sounding words like "interdifferentiation" to hide Orange-Kun's plans to make bigotry respectable. More emphatically, many people are incredulous when I tell them that Orange-Kun intends to insult the intelligence, interests, and life plans of whole groups of people. "How could Orange-Kun be so careless?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is indubitably possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Orange-Kun plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that if we foreground the cognitive and emotional palette of his bookish, presumptuous grievances rather than their pathology we can enter vitally into Orange-Kun's world. Why do we want to do that? Because some people believe that one day Orange-Kun's chargés d'affaires will empower the oppressed to control their own lives. Such people are doomed to disappointment, especially when one considers that if Orange-Kun's plan to deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols is to be discouraged then the wisest course of action is to promote peace, prosperity, and quality of life, both here and abroad. Before we start down that road I ought to remind you that his remarks are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I provide an atmosphere of mutual respect, free from Stalinism, misoneism, and all other forms of prejudice and intolerance, Orange-Kun's invariant response is to batten on the credulity of the ignorant.

Dadaism can be deadly but Orange-Kun's fairy tales are much worse. While Orange-Kun insists that granting him complete control over our lives is as important as breathing air, reality dictates otherwise. Actually, if you want a real dose of reality, look at how we ought to teach Orange-Kun a lesson. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that if anyone should propose a practical scheme for encouraging our spirits to soar, I should be quite disposed to incur almost any degree of expense to accomplish that object. In the meantime, let me point out that if we find more constructive contexts in which to work toward resolving conflicts then the sea of Pyrrhonism, on which Orange-Kun so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. I have begged Orange-Kun's backers to step forth and show pluck and optimism when presented with threats and terror. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Orange-Kun might retaliate? To turn that question around, do ill-tempered lounge lizards like Orange-Kun's coadjutors actually have lives, or do they exist solely to transmogrify society's petty gripes and irrational fears into "issues" to be catered to? No, don't guess; this isn't audience participation day. I'll just tell you. But before I do, you should note that we must reach out to people with the message that Orange-Kun's loquacity and volubility of tongue serve only to do the entire country a grave disservice. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to ring the bells of truth.

For the nonce, Orange-Kun is content to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of iconoclastic conspiracies. But eventually, he will put the gods of heaven into the corner as obsolete and outmoded and, in their stead, burn incense to the idol Mammon. He hopes that by clever arrangements he may succeed in saving his threatened power. In other words—and let's say this plainly, clearly, and soberly so that no one can misinterpret his true intentions—his wisecracks are like an enormous jingoism-spewing machine. We must begin dismantling that structure. We must put a monkey wrench in its gears. And we must acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment because the justification Orange-Kun gave for bringing ugliness and nastiness into our lives was one of the most uninformed justifications I've ever heard. It was so uninformed, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: The last time I heard Orange-Kun ramble on in his characteristically bibulous blather he said something about wanting to establish a world government complete with a world army, a world parliament, a world court, and numerous other agencies that progressively enlarge and increasingly centralize the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction. I feel sorry for the human race when I hear stuff like that.

Once it becomes clear that Orange-Kun's communications blend power-drunk statism (manifested in a pathetic stance) with a purported support for environmentalism, trade unionism, and the dignity of labor, it becomes apparent that Orange-Kun thinks it's good that his ultimata bribe the parasitic with the earnings of the productive. It is difficult to know how to respond to such monumentally misplaced values, but let's try this: He has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that he is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why we are at war. Don't think we're not just because you're not stepping over dead bodies in the streets. We're at war with Orange-Kun's superficial ventures. We're at war with his fickle bons mots. And we're at war with his perfidious undertakings. As in any war, we ought to be aware of the fact that if Orange-Kun got his way, he'd be able to display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that.

Careful examination of Orange-Kun's precepts have left me no choice but to conclude that Orange-Kun is a very conceited little man. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: Why does Orange-Kun insist on boring holes in the hull of the boat in which he himself is also a passenger? I mean, Orange-Kun ignores the lustrous ascendance and near triumph of the glorious potential of free Man. I'll go further: Orange-Kun presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors sadistic personæ non gratæ. And here we have the ultimate irony because the most troubling aspect of his personality is his intolerance of dissent. That's not something that we learn in school—though it should be. That's not something that we emote about while watching movies and TV shows—though it should be. What it is is something that tells us loudly and clearly that Orange-Kun has been trying to convince us that the majority of dour racketeers are heroes, if not saints. This pathetic attempt to tap into the national resurgence of overt deconstructionism deserves no comment other than to say that it's Orange-Kun's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to use commercialism as a weapon for systematic political cleansing of the population. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a putrid idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that Orange-Kun says that the best way to serve one's country is to elevate his policies to prominence as epistemological principles. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that while he manufactures crises over exclusivism, Orange-Kun's entourage has been concentrating all the wealth of the world into his own hands. And there you have it. Orange-Kun McFag's flimflams are pockmarked with baleful corporatism and other assorted ills.

[bfsdbsdfbdsfb]

[InternetIsSeriousBusiness]