Cheat Engine

[Up2Admin]

That actually looks pretty hawt.

[Uzeil]

I completely disagree with the eye vs listening thing. Icon 'guru's say allll the time that your icon should have something to do with what your *product* or whatever is, just like 'naming guru's tell you to incorporate a word revolving around what you're putting out there(or at least a distant cousin word)

I say bullshit :s If you look at almost any name or icon that caught on it was because it was simple and memorable -- little to nothing else. Even things that had similarities to what they were (facebook, myspace) were the ones winning over similar sites because their names were SIMPLER and more MEMORABLE. (Elsewhere: Apple, Adobe, Google, and note that Microsoft is doing just fine despite the fact that it's nothing but 'micro'(small) and does much more than just 'soft'(ware).)

The eye is a good memorable trait, the name goob is nice and descriptive, and has the added quality that if someone says something about 'goob', it's pretty hard to mistake what they're saying. The only issue I'd pick is that 'goob' does remind one a bit of google.

I say don't do the keys If you're going to make 'GOOB' into something with multiple projects inside of it(i.e. IMGOOB, GOOBMUSIC, or what-have-you), give them each their own little parts of the logo to turn them into an icon. Leave the logo as just the eye and GOOB -- it looks nice

Note: It actually looks like you're already doing that suggestion, and I don't mean to make it sound like it wasn't your idea I only say it incase you haven't thought the same thing.

[1929394839292057839194958]

[Slappy101]

[1929394839292057839194958]

[CrisNMP]

Looks like hes trying to say that the logo and name don't need to describe what the product is selling.
ie: apple doesn't sell fruits

OPs example is the same as those, is a like a blob named goob with an eye and he can still use it for uploading sites, music site, etc

[1929394839292057839194958]

[Up2Admin]

I really don't see the problem, I think it looks great, doesn't need anything else. I'd even be willing to help you turn it into an actual site.

[Uzeil]

I like how you spent two posts and another person spent one post saying I was wrong on something I didn't say. As CrisNMP said, all I said was that it doesn't have to be named or drawn to describe what they're selling.

And how does McDonalds look like a chip? To me it looks 100% like a yellow 'M' with a little bit of a shine to it. Maybe looks a little like two french fries if you really want to put the "THAT INK PLOT LOOKS LIKE A BURD" one on me.

'Adobe' has little to nothing at all with what they sell(unless huge loop like "UH, WELL PEOPLE KINDA BUILD STUFF AROUND WHAT THEY MAKE WITH THEIR PROGRAMS SOMETIMES" which would bring us back to the 'distant cousin of a related word' thing), nor is their logo of an adobe house, it's literally a fuckin A. Google isn't a word, and it's logo is just it's name with some colors(where Goob isn't a word, and it's logo is it's name with an eye). And as CrisNMP said, Apple doesn't sell fruit (to my knowledge).

Then Slappy agrees but with the note "Unless the logo is just text but then it's irrelevant," but then Konr posts a bunch of *styled text* photos.


I knew someone would disagree with me when I said something about the self-proclaimed 'guru's being wrong(that is, I figured a self-proclaimed 'guru' would disagree), I just didn't expect they'd be so horrible at it.

[1929394839292057839194958]

[Up2Admin]

Eye + Image... seems to make sense to me, I don't see the big deal here. I think it works great with the product. Or are you guys just gonna totally disregard his post about making it an image sharing site?

[TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO]

Looks pretty sweet. I personally like the blue one best, when compared to the green one.

[1929394839292057839194958]

[Odd]

[1929394839292057839194958]