| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
I am God.
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: -1
Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 1263
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:20 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Cannabis Sativa wrote: | | Kruë wrote: | | Cannabis Sativa wrote: | | who the fuck fills up 200GB? |
i have 300GB of my 1TB full O____________o |
with? |
Movies, i think i have around 40 or 50.
Music, around 7k songs.
Lots of games like MW2, ect. some games i don't even play, i just feel the need to HAVE THEM there.
pictures, LOTS AND LOTS of HD pictures, because i like my windows 7 desktop to scroll threw them every 10 seconds so i never have to see the same shit twice in a day, and can maintain the constant change. (i have like 2000 of those pics)
a few home made videos with friends
idk the other normal shit you have on a computer?
NOT PORN, i do not download porn... www.youjizz.com for dat shit yo.
_________________
┌─┐
┴─┴
ಠ_ರೃ
I'm Kruë |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gogodr
I post too much
 Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have over 200GB of anime in my 400GB n.n
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
I am God.
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: -1
Joined: 15 Jun 2008
Posts: 1263
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | I have over 200GB of anime in my 400GB n.n |
EEP,
the only anime i ever liked was inuyasha. I don't even know if it is anime...
AND DBZ... AND BLEACH. thats all though.
i wish i could DL the full bleach series though. idk where :<
_________________
┌─┐
┴─┴
ಠ_ರೃ
I'm Kruë |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 50
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste.
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 50
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second. |
I doubt you have insane amounts of money.
Also
| Amazon ioXtreme Bundle wrote: | | The simplified NAND flash controller architecture required to fit this kind of phenomenal performance onto a single PCIe card, allows only one 80 GB ioXtreme to function in the computer. |
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AverageAzn247
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 34
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 909
Location: Austin,TX with 72 virgins
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Cannabis Sativa wrote: | | who the fuck fills up 200GB? |
pr0n and pirating. I only haz 50 gigs left.
_________________
| Waxxup wrote: | What are Night Elves?
A girl group? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second. |
I doubt you have insane amounts of money.
Also
| Amazon ioXtreme Bundle wrote: | | The simplified NAND flash controller architecture required to fit this kind of phenomenal performance onto a single PCIe card, allows only one 80 GB ioXtreme to function in the computer. |
|
I'm not buying it :/
I would preffer to spend that money in a core i7 with 24GB of RAM and still I would have money left to spend
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 50
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second. |
I doubt you have insane amounts of money.
Also
| Amazon ioXtreme Bundle wrote: | | The simplified NAND flash controller architecture required to fit this kind of phenomenal performance onto a single PCIe card, allows only one 80 GB ioXtreme to function in the computer. |
|
I'm not buying it :/
I would preffer to spend that money in a core i7 with 24GB of RAM and still I would have money left to spend |
Lul no. You would be in debt.
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second. |
I doubt you have insane amounts of money.
Also
| Amazon ioXtreme Bundle wrote: | | The simplified NAND flash controller architecture required to fit this kind of phenomenal performance onto a single PCIe card, allows only one 80 GB ioXtreme to function in the computer. |
|
I'm not buying it :/
I would preffer to spend that money in a core i7 with 24GB of RAM and still I would have money left to spend |
Lul no. You would be in debt. |
nope :/ I made a pre oder sheet some weeks ago of it with only 12GBs of Ram (( mother board, processor, and RAM )) because the 4GB RAMs werent here yet and it was around 1100$
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AverageAzn247
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 34
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 909
Location: Austin,TX with 72 virgins
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second. |
I doubt you have insane amounts of money.
Also
| Amazon ioXtreme Bundle wrote: | | The simplified NAND flash controller architecture required to fit this kind of phenomenal performance onto a single PCIe card, allows only one 80 GB ioXtreme to function in the computer. |
|
I'm not buying it :/
I would preffer to spend that money in a core i7 with 24GB of RAM and still I would have money left to spend |
Lul no. You would be in debt. |
nope :/ I made a pre oder sheet some weeks ago of it with only 12GBs of Ram (( mother board, processor, and RAM )) because the 4GB RAMs werent here yet and it was around 1100$ |
was it the top line i7? caz the best ones are around 1k. Y the hell would u need 24 gigs of ram? can a 64 bit even use that much?
_________________
| Waxxup wrote: | What are Night Elves?
A girl group? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Aviar³
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 50
Joined: 03 Jan 2008
Posts: 655
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second. |
I doubt you have insane amounts of money.
Also
| Amazon ioXtreme Bundle wrote: | | The simplified NAND flash controller architecture required to fit this kind of phenomenal performance onto a single PCIe card, allows only one 80 GB ioXtreme to function in the computer. |
|
I'm not buying it :/
I would preffer to spend that money in a core i7 with 24GB of RAM and still I would have money left to spend |
Lul no. You would be in debt. |
nope :/ I made a pre oder sheet some weeks ago of it with only 12GBs of Ram (( mother board, processor, and RAM )) because the 4GB RAMs werent here yet and it was around 1100$ |
24Gb requires a special board.
_________________
This is the inception of deception, checking the depth of your perception.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | Agent Black Bear wrote: | | So better I/O times? I do not think it is justified to spend that much, a normal SSD still has dramatically less I/O times than a standard HDD due to no moving pieces (where seek times were what caused the dramatic speed impact when fetching any data from memory, in general around 10ms). Only reason a person would need PCI-E architecture card is if they manipulate insane amounts of data at one given time (forcing the computer to fetch from pagefiles and so on), or have money to waste. |
I think is the second. |
I doubt you have insane amounts of money.
Also
| Amazon ioXtreme Bundle wrote: | | The simplified NAND flash controller architecture required to fit this kind of phenomenal performance onto a single PCIe card, allows only one 80 GB ioXtreme to function in the computer. |
|
I'm not buying it :/
I would preffer to spend that money in a core i7 with 24GB of RAM and still I would have money left to spend |
Lul no. You would be in debt. |
nope :/ I made a pre oder sheet some weeks ago of it with only 12GBs of Ram (( mother board, processor, and RAM )) because the 4GB RAMs werent here yet and it was around 1100$ |
24Gb requires a special board. |
hmmm I was not aware of that I might investigate more then xP hopefully every thing I need to build a 24GB RAm i7 processor will be available in peru for January
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
