View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BanMe Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 375 Location: Farmington NH, USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah way to go flyte.. you responded so predictably, and humanly to see yourself reflected in your words.. that its funny..if you dont know what im saying there is a old saying that goes "peolple dont say things about others unless they feel partly that about themselves..noticed i refrained from name calling and downight rudeness..this is also pertinent to irwin as well..and wtf erronous function's cause there kernelmode intrinsics... fuck that...try it and find out..no better way then to try.. but no you fail to see that or find the slightest fascination with "other" ways to do things..and this shows above all else that "you are some college schooled microsoft bound "know IT all's" that was fashioned and scuptled your whole life to do things the "most lame but usable" ways..just like so many others out there produced by the factory of this life.. that cant stop coloring between the lines..you just cant see the lines anymore apparently.. ;p
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
smartz993 I post too much
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 2013 Location: USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Most of his argument on the topic was based on the fact that the structures are prone to change in future versions of Windows, and you still fail to address that.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BanMe Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 375 Location: Farmington NH, USA
|
Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 4:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thankz smartz993 i must've been to high to realize that he was making a argument..but yea.."prone to change.. right..i forgot about that.." well i have no true argument to that point except only that the TEB / PEB has gone mostly unchanged from NT 2k XP..Vista(32 bit versions) but i guess thats not a valid argument.. for irwin .. ("cause microshaft says it "Could change"..) well guess fucking what everything "could change" but it for the most part hasn't.but still im not mad at you, and frankly i could care less of your opinion of my intelligence.. and i bet almost any amount that this post will illicit further meanless banter on this dead end topic .. so i for one ask the gracious and smart moderators to close the topic before such non-sense ensues..
kind regards BanMe...
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BanMe Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Nov 2005 Posts: 375 Location: Farmington NH, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 6:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
frankly you all can fuck off..i could careless "about your courtesy or respect for me" or for that matter anyones opinion . .sadlyits not like i said "hey use my code over yours", i was simply giving the person posting the option to do it a different way.. i was simply stating that there are other methods to use to get the required information..and in all likely hood the program the OP is writing probably wont ever leave his computer..and though it is unorthodox to do so, you could very easily done it a different way with far less code.. but noo you take it as a afront/attack on you.. and then turn around and attack me.. frankly im glad i got to see the narrow-minddedness that comes from your posts and all those who agree with you .. oh its too risky.. to do it the "non-standard way.." fuck that shit.. thats not the way i was taught to do things.. i wasnt taught to take the path of least resistance.. just because its the "perscribed" way does not mean its the best way or "only" way to go about it. but hey i simply tried to present the OP with my method of going about it and you said that doing it that way was "Disgusting and stupid"..and i say that your a narrowminded asshole who has his head so far up his ass he cant read the rules of the forum stating "Along with rule number one, there is to be no flaming. Flaming falls under spam. If you dislike something, someone, or anything for that matter, we do not need to know about it in this section." and aww i just broke them too..boo hoo... but my guess is you never even read that .. cause on your quest to make me look stupid, you just disregard the code of conduct and fly off the hinges with you comments of "change and standards" and do it the provided way cause doing it "any" other way is not right.. fuck that and fuck you for thinking that.. and frankly fuck everyone that agrees with you to.. because i for one will not stand for this.. and maybe you are right in that the Internal structures have changed alot in the past..(something i wasnt totaly aware of) but the possibility of them changing "NOW" or in the future for NT/2k/and XP is highly "unlikely" so the viability of using them with a backup plan is a good way to not only learn programming but it will lead to better debugger skills and a more in depth understanding of the way things work... but you neglect to see that part of the picture..
BanMe
p.s. im sorry irwin for (involving your offspring) i was feeling heated..and overstepped my bounds..
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|