Cheat Engine

Wintermoot

Why are we doing it?

I am out of touch with the Maple hacking community but, shouldn't just changing the 'sub' to 'add' work?

Instead of:

Slugsnack · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:44 am Post subject:

i don't see a sub or an add..

Ziztey · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:57 am Post subject:

I tried, did not work.

ElectroFusion · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:06 am Post subject:

WTF, I thought they were jmping the function blink.
Think about it next time, they jmped the function blink, so there is more needed to be done than just a codecave.. Plus, whats wrong with the way they do it now?

DeletedUser14087 · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:12 am Post subject:

why the hell there is __stdcall ? i have a feeling you people just copy and paste all these codes lol.

&Vage · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:19 am Post subject:

Symbol · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:24 am Post subject:

What's the point? not only it's a naked function, it's also a hook which takes no parameters... so it won't clean the stack or push the parameters to the stack. (instead of using registers, like in fast-call)

ElectroFusion · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:46 pm Post subject:

The __stdcall calling convention is used to call Win32 API functions. The callee cleans the stack, so the compiler makes vararg functions __cdecl. Functions that use this calling convention require a function prototype.
^^ = http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zxk0tw93(VS.71).aspx

If it cleans the stack, and your using it on a naked function, it can't clean the stack.

DeletedUser14087 · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:48 pm Post subject:

i generally use __stdcall on exporting/importing shit, that's about it.

Wintermoot · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:32 pm Post subject:

Anyone complaining about the code is a fucking retard. Did anyone actually read my entire post? I cut parts of the code out that were either useless or standard and anyone with a brain would assume what was being done.

kitterz · Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 9:50 pm Post subject:

*ahem*
This is how blink works...evey x amount of time, it go through ad subs 1e off of the master blink counter in edi.

When edi = 0, it stop blinking.

if you change it to "add edi, 1e", it will add 1e instead of taking away 1e. Thus, the counter becomes bigger, not smaller.

However, when noblink is turned off to prevent d/c (cause of the ggcrc), it resumes "sub edi, 1e", and eventually the counter in edi will reach zero. (it will last longer, but only the same length you kept it at "add edi, 1e")

What Pro-Surf and I did, was add soooo much to the blink counter, that you can turn it off immediately, and the "sub edi,1e" will never cause the blink counter to reach 0, because it is so large.

Understand?

ZacTheSin · Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:44 am Post subject:

Well, to make it not d/c, why not make it so it refreshs by turning on and off every now and then?

Like..

So at the moment, it's
sub edi,1e
We change it to
add edi,1e
(Or something massive as, so that it doesn't go down till a change channel/map is done.

How about, we monitor what it's done?

Or maybe

it goes like,

kitterz · Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:23 am Post subject:

ZacTheSin · Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 8:15 am Post subject:

I see.

I'm sure you could use a codecave to do the same thing, depending on how it's made.

As long as it doesn't do something stupid like find an empty address every time it is re enabled during the delay, it should be fine.

ElJEffro · Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:18 am Post subject: