| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pancake Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 26 Jul 2007 Posts: 843
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
IMO, the Antec Twelve Hundred is overkill in most cases (heh, cases).
The GTX 260 on its own provides a pretty good performance vs. price against ATi cards of similar caliber, but the Core 216 is overpriced for the performance improvement it offers. However, if you're getting a P45 board, then I'd recommend an ATi card.
Personally, I would stick with a Gigabyte P45 board.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136218
A 620W PSU by Corsair would cover it, with room to spare.
Corsair RAM looks pretty good, especially their models with "DHX" cooling technology. But A-DATA is fine.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Humper Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 1545
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, the other 2 got the most things but.
I would suggest you to buy a chassi @ around 100-150$, that case is good, but unnessesry for this build.
Change hdd to this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16822136218
And @ 260, 216 its good really. I don't like ati (tho I bought many now) but the new model stands up alot.
If you have time to wait, the new (again yes) 260GTX will come soon.
WIth 55nm.
That cpu is a little overkill, 550watt should be enought if your not planning to have sli/cf.
Good build, like it.
Might wanna change the CPU to E8400 if your only gaming.
Regards humper
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
the 260 216 is about $10 more, and is about 20% more powerful.
_________________
CARCASSSSSSSSSSSSSSS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vmanisme Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 05 Sep 2007 Posts: 458 Location: Google!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg I'm a spammer
Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 5801
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Konata Izumi wrote: | | the 260 216 is about $10 more, and is about 20% more powerful. |
uh, no.
there's almost zero difference, at all. It's basically a ploy to extract more money out of idiots. And it's a lot more than $10.
Straight from the latest Hardocp review:
| Quote: | The only problem we have with the new GeForce GTX 260 is this: it has no right to be more expensive than the original GTX 260, and yet it is. It is no faster than the original, regardless of how many more shaders or texture units it has, and yet it consistently costs more. It is hard for us to see the "revised" GeForce GTX 260 as anything but an excuse for NVIDIA to raise prices back up to where perhaps they should have been competition notwithstanding. NVIDIA maniacally cut prices in the face of stiff competition from AMD, and perhaps cut a little too deep. It is convenient, then, that this supposedly updated GeForce GTX 260 GPU comes out at a higher price tag.
Remember that it was initially supposed to supplement the original GTX 260, not supplant it. All that has changed now, and the "old" GTX 260 is going away. While we can understand that NVIDIA and its partners need to make money as much as any other business, we very much feel like this has been a case of bait-and-switch, and while we're expected to spend more money on this "new" GTX 260, we aren't really getting anything more out of it according to every game we have tested so far. Thankfully, prices on the “new” GTX 260 are starting to drop this holiday season, and we hope to see that continue. |
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTU4OSw0LCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==
the difference is nothing.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
creative1 Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Sep 2008 Posts: 158
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| vmanisme wrote: | | get a cheaper case and get 8GB RAM instead |
I don't really understand why you would need 8gb of RAM, seems like a bit overkill to me. Also, anything over 4gb is (physically) useless on a 32-bit system. So this leads me to ask, what is the planned OS for the system?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| slovach wrote: | | Konata Izumi wrote: | | the 260 216 is about $10 more, and is about 20% more powerful. |
uh, no.
there's almost zero difference, at all. It's basically a ploy to extract more money out of idiots. And it's a lot more than $10.
Straight from the latest Hardocp review:
| Quote: | The only problem we have with the new GeForce GTX 260 is this: it has no right to be more expensive than the original GTX 260, and yet it is. It is no faster than the original, regardless of how many more shaders or texture units it has, and yet it consistently costs more. It is hard for us to see the "revised" GeForce GTX 260 as anything but an excuse for NVIDIA to raise prices back up to where perhaps they should have been competition notwithstanding. NVIDIA maniacally cut prices in the face of stiff competition from AMD, and perhaps cut a little too deep. It is convenient, then, that this supposedly updated GeForce GTX 260 GPU comes out at a higher price tag.
Remember that it was initially supposed to supplement the original GTX 260, not supplant it. All that has changed now, and the "old" GTX 260 is going away. While we can understand that NVIDIA and its partners need to make money as much as any other business, we very much feel like this has been a case of bait-and-switch, and while we're expected to spend more money on this "new" GTX 260, we aren't really getting anything more out of it according to every game we have tested so far. Thankfully, prices on the “new” GTX 260 are starting to drop this holiday season, and we hope to see that continue. |
http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html?art=MTU4OSw0LCxoZW50aHVzaWFzdA==
the difference is nothing. | http://www.guru3d.com/article/top-10-games-with-radeon-4870-1-gb--geforce-gtx-260-core-216-test/1
and 8 gigs is too much.
the os is vista ultimate 64, and i already know about the 32 bit 3.5 gigs limit.
_________________
CARCASSSSSSSSSSSSSSS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg I'm a spammer
Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 5801
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Konata Izumi wrote: | http://www.guru3d.com/article/top-10-games-with-radeon-4870-1-gb--geforce-gtx-260-core-216-test/1
and 8 gigs is too much.
the os is vista ultimate 64, and i already know about the 32 bit 3.5 gigs limit. |
Ok? That proved nothing.
The 216 version is a waste of money. $40+ dollars extra for a few extra frames in best case scenario. Fantastic.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
its the same price.
_________________
CARCASSSSSSSSSSSSSSS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hcavolsdsadgadsg I'm a spammer
Reputation: 26
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 5801
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Except it's not?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Imitazion Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 558
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
You always contribute with shitty advice. Why?
Yes, this is spam/offtopic. w/e.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Imitazion wrote: |
You always contribute with shitty advice. Why?
Yes, this is spam/offtopic. w/e. | beecause hes a faggot.
and this build is fialized.
_________________
CARCASSSSSSSSSSSSSSS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|