| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Go with this one
It supports CFX and is cheaper than the ones you picked.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
both are 16x?
_________________
CARCASSSSSSSSSSSSSSS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A PCI-e 2.0 16x link allows for 8GB/s. Even with a regular PCI-e 16x slot (4GB/s), my graphics card runs games great. You're considering a total of 12GB/s transfer speed, which is far more than you need to play even games like Crysis well.
CrossFire X is just the latest version of CrossFire, it isn't anything different (if you get what I mean). Any Intel-chipset motherboard with 2 PCI-e lanes will support CrossFire, or how would it support the second graphics card?
I don't see how the board that kls chose is worth $30 ($20 + $10 shipping) more than this one. Besides supporting 16GB of RAM (as opposed to 8GB), a more effective northbridge heatsink design, and one more PCI-e slot (I doubt you'd use it though), it isn't much better than the P5Q Pro. I would recommend both of them though.
The Gigabyte motherboard still looks good.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Konata Izumi Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Feb 2008 Posts: 1527
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2008 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ill go with the gigabyte then.
_________________
CARCASSSSSSSSSSSSSSS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|