| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Look-Familiar Newbie cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Jun 2008 Posts: 19 Location: US
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 9:14 am Post subject: Feature suggestion for future versions |
|
|
I don't code in high level programming so I am unable to say if this is possible or just impractical to implement.
Something that has always annoyed me was the seeming way to sort found values in the upper left-hand-side box of values when, in reality, you can not sort it. It's always sorted "Address" as priority. When you click on "Value" it doesn't do anything.
I thought it would be helpful if you could sort the list of found addresses by Value and not just Address.
So yeah, if it is not possible or too time consuming please let me know. Also please let me know if this is something other people want as well. (I don't want to seem foolish by thinking this but I'll accept it if that's the case)
(If this was posted in another thread please delete this post)
_________________
Good times =D |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilly Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 1645 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought there was a thread for the suggestions of the next versions of CE?
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte Site Admin
Reputation: 475
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 25983 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
that is this whole forum for
but for the suggestion: I doubt it's possible (or at least usefull). Especially when there are lots of addresses. The addresses are read in this order from the disk with the current file pointer. Sorting it means having to sort the results file, which can be 1GB big
_________________
Tools give you results. Knowledge gives you control.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Twilly Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 05 Dec 2007 Posts: 1645 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dark Byte wrote: | that is this whole forum for
but for the suggestion: I doubt it's possible (or at least usefull). Especially when there are lots of addresses. The addresses are read in this order from the disk with the current file pointer. Sorting it means having to sort the results file, which can be 1GB big |
Heh, then it would take years for slow internet to downlload CE.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Look-Familiar Newbie cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Jun 2008 Posts: 19 Location: US
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dark Byte wrote: | that is this whole forum for
but for the suggestion: I doubt it's possible (or at least usefull). Especially when there are lots of addresses. The addresses are read in this order from the disk with the current file pointer. Sorting it means having to sort the results file, which can be 1GB big |
haha WOW. That is nuts. Thank you for the response ^-^
_________________
Good times =D |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nielskool Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Jun 2007 Posts: 65
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 12:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
but it would be usefull i think. just let it check the file size and if its less than 100mb or something than its able to re order it.
or maybe poeple can put a value in the settings for them self(experts)
but i wanted it too.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|