| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| XP or Vista |
| XP |
|
84% |
[ 21 ] |
| Vista |
|
16% |
[ 4 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 25 |
|
| Author |
Message |
UberNewbie Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 07 May 2008 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At this point it is not so much the bugs though it is true Vista is limited to certain programs it is used but from what I have seen most of the ones it cannot use it does not need or has a substitute so it is personal preference on that aspect. But benchmark tests have proven that the systems Vista and XP run on about the same speed so running the same speed (some aspects unnoticeable faster, some aspect unnoticeable slower) for more money gaining only visual improvements would fall under also as personal preference. So bottom line if you have the dough or have access to getting Vista it is personal preference but there is no reason to really get it other than that. I personally ran the beta for awhile for my A+ class before it came out,the beta had a ton of bugs. Then I got the regular home edition a couple months ago and it worked nicely with my pc but I preferred XP and swapped back over. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GoogleCacheFuku Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 386
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 3:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| xp with vista insperat 2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
92Garfield I'm a spammer
Reputation: 57
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 5871 Location: Banana Republic Germany
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
| slovach wrote: | | KreepeRz wrote: | | It depends how many ram are you getting because Vista does require alot of rams |
| slovach wrote: | RAM is astronomically faster than your hard drive, superfetch caches commonly used programs / shit into RAM, the performance benefit is obvious. Vistas method of memory management is far superior to XP's.
Yes, you can disable it, but doing so is stupid. |
The more ram, the better it works, but it's not just wasting memory, which seems to be what everyone thinks |
its not just wasting memory?
why does opensuse support more ram but need less then?
the vista style needs around 200MB RAM _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Uber-1337 Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 07 Dec 2007 Posts: 112
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 7:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| kaizoken wrote: | | vista suxs like any thing else in my own worlds there not compatible with most stuff i would go with windows FTW |
have we not been talking about windows for the last 3 pages? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Rawss. Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 1687 Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| UberNewbie wrote: | | At this point it is not so much the bugs though it is true Vista is limited to certain programs it is used but from what I have seen most of the ones it cannot use it does not need or has a substitute so it is personal preference on that aspect. But benchmark tests have proven that the systems Vista and XP run on about the same speed so running the same speed (some aspects unnoticeable faster, some aspect unnoticeable slower) for more money gaining only visual improvements would fall under also as personal preference. So bottom line if you have the dough or have access to getting Vista it is personal preference but there is no reason to really get it other than that. I personally ran the beta for awhile for my A+ class before it came out,the beta had a ton of bugs. Then I got the regular home edition a couple months ago and it worked nicely with my pc but I preferred XP and swapped back over. |
Long story short, Vista was and still can be (unless you have a good version - not basic) a very flawful system. As Vista and XP have many simalarities the only reason to get Vista over XP is if you want to try it or if you just dont like XP. Vista's interface is better, but it is very limited. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|