| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, on system requirements lab it says my pc is 2.21ghz rated at 3.50ghz
so which is it really?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Psy Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 1366
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
It means your 'actual' CPU speed is most likely 2.21 Ghz, thats your clock speed/effective speed...however you want to refer to it.
However, you have a performance rating of 3.50Ghz, which tries to take into account performance optimizations of newer AMD/Intel processors and the fact that it may be dual-core etc (2 logical CPU's).
Go with what it says in regards to the CPU. Look at the 'performance rating' it gives you if thats what you mean.
At the end of the day, no-one can tell you what to get for your own PC. It depends entirely upon what you want to go for and what it will be used for etc.
~Psych
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 11:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh ok..
but this pc is only 1 core
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Psy Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 1366
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Still go with the perf. rating though. It turns out to be more relevant when deciding what it will run.
At this time though, a dual-core CPU will give you performance benefits, thats a given. Most stuff is optimized for dual-core now, conversion programs and games for example most certainly are.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
right now i actually am happy what im getting out of this system.. its really fast for me.. never had any problems with it..
thats why i thought upgrading might be a good idea
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Psy Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 1366
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You could think about it the other way though mate.
You said it yourself about it been fast enough for you and it seems to be doing what you want.
Theres not much point upgrading unless there is a real pressing issue to do so. Its stable and fine as it is like you say.
You'll probably get more hassle than you initially wanted...if its a new mobo for example you'll need to re-install new mainboard drivers etc when it is all built back up...and its just one of those annoying things you will maybe wish you didn't do, as it wasn't completely necessary
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You can run every single game out there right now. But at low/lowest possible settings with that high resolution.
Intel:
C2D E4500: $130
IP-35E: $60 (after MIR)
1GB RAM: $20
AMD:
Athlon 64 X2 4400+: $65
GA-MA770-S3: $85
1GB RAM: $20
It's more like $200
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Psy Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 1366
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I for one do rate this board:
GA-MA770-DS3 (its DS3 :p)
Thats if your not bothered about sli setups or crossfirex.
If it was an upgrade though superweapons, I wouldn't go for a mere 4400x2, something like a 5600x2 is decent for the price point. And the idea is to upgrade to 2Gb ram, not stay at 1gb. Decent performance OCZ RAM @ 800Mhz 4-4-4-12 timings will set you back about $55, which is hardly a lot considering how good it is.
Stick with your current rig for a while longer. You're virtually talking yourself into it NeverForgotten
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
every single game out there?
Even game like Crysis?
Wont quite upgrade atm now..
It is doing me very good.. it actually feels like a dual core to me instead one single core
Thanks Psych
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Crysis at the absolute lowest settings, then maybe it will run at a playable frame rate. Even my horrible (OC'd ATi Radeon 9550) can run Crysis (at 1024x768), though at an unplayable speed.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 10:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| superweapons wrote: | | Crysis at the absolute lowest settings, then maybe it will run at a playable frame rate. Even my horrible (OC'd ATi Radeon 9550) can run Crysis (at 1024x768), though at an unplayable speed. |
do i have to like change the game setting or monitor, etc
not so good at these kind of things
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Psy Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 1
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 1366
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Changing your monitor for the purpose of running the game in higher resolutions is pointless for you at this stage mate. Like superweapons said, it would be too much for your system at much higher than 1024x768, for instance, with crysis.
Remember, that a monitor isn't going to take any load of the PC, it is relying on the graphics card heavily to process the frames ready for display
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|