| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dark Byte
Site Admin
 Reputation: 470
Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 25807
Location: The netherlands
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: Increasing a integer in delphi |
 |
|
As first post in this section here's a piece of code that will increase the value of i with 1
| Code: |
var i: integer;
var pi: ^integer;
begin
//..... (some code that sets i to something)
//now increase with 1
pi:=@i;
pi^:=pi^-2;
i:=i+1;
inc(i,2);
end;
|
there, now was that so hard ?
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flawedmatrix
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 819
Location: 14598622 for yourself...
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, I've always thought I should just do
But now we include pointers. Lol.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ungreat
Expert Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 215
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
is for lame people.
is 'teh pwnage'
or (will it allow this?)
You might have to move i into eax then eax back into i... freaky thing that inline asm is.
_________________
| Code: | mov r10, qword ptr [rsp+0A28h+arg_5F8]
shl rdx, 20h
mov r11, 7010008004002001h
or rax, rdx
mov rcx, r10
xor rcx, rax
lea rax, [rsp+0A28h+var_2C8] |
Oh man, I'm getting too excited |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flawedmatrix
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 819
Location: 14598622 for yourself...
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ungreat wrote: | is for lame people.
is 'teh pwnage'
or (will it allow this?)
You might have to move i into eax then eax back into i... freaky thing that inline asm is. |
I tried inc(i) before. For some reason Renko claims it doesn't work. I started using i:=i+1 ever since.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Renkokuken
GO Moderator
![]() Reputation: 4
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 3249
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| flawedmatrix wrote: | | Ungreat wrote: | is for lame people.
is 'teh pwnage'
or (will it allow this?)
You might have to move i into eax then eax back into i... freaky thing that inline asm is. |
I tried inc(i) before. For some reason Renko claims it doesn't work. I started using i:=i+1 ever since. |
That was when I just began, I was using invalid types. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
flawedmatrix
Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 819
Location: 14598622 for yourself...
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 2:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Renkokuken wrote: | | flawedmatrix wrote: | | Ungreat wrote: | is for lame people.
is 'teh pwnage'
or (will it allow this?)
You might have to move i into eax then eax back into i... freaky thing that inline asm is. |
I tried inc(i) before. For some reason Renko claims it doesn't work. I started using i:=i+1 ever since. |
That was when I just began, I was using invalid types. |
I am shaking my fists at you like a jewish mother in denial. Yeah, types can get annoying.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pyr0magex
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 1192
Location: my room
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
yea... is it just me, or do people always make things harder than it really is. Or is DarkBytes code better in some way?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
appalsap
Moderator
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006
Posts: 6753
Location: Pakistan
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
pyr0magex, read in between the lines.
| Dark Byte wrote: | | there, now was that so hard ? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pyr0magex
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 1192
Location: my room
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lol, but I meant in general as well, I see a lot of code that doesn't really need to be there.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ungreat
Expert Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Feb 2007
Posts: 215
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I could look through public ASM scripts and truncate almost all of them (or make those jump changes more efficient via nop/jmp instead of a conditional). However, I think we can expect DarkByte to only make something more complicated than it is on purpose (like for this instance, to be 'joking' around. Oh DarkByte, you jokester you.)
Renko: Was your type an integer? xD (signed/unsigned shouldn't matter)
inc(i) should be the equivelant of i++ (in c++) or i:=i+1 (in Delphi).
Or you can do the ol' inc(i,5) for an i:=i+5, etc. If you can do one, you should be able to do the other. I think the overloaded versions exist because one in asm will be inc [mem] (or reg), where the other would be add [mem],param (or reg)
In other words... if one works, as should the other.
_________________
| Code: | mov r10, qword ptr [rsp+0A28h+arg_5F8]
shl rdx, 20h
mov r11, 7010008004002001h
or rax, rdx
mov rcx, r10
xor rcx, rax
lea rax, [rsp+0A28h+var_2C8] |
Oh man, I'm getting too excited |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Noz3001
I'm a spammer
 Reputation: 26
Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 6220
Location: /dev/null
|
| Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2007 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
