 |
Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
bknight2602
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 08 Oct 2012
Posts: 577
|
 Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 10:10 am Post subject: Different search results |
 |
|
I'm running code searches and verifying/checking with manual searches. The results are what I would call significant.
| Code: |
memscan_firstScan(MS, soValueBetween, vtWord, rtRounded, expvalue1, expvalue2, "00000000", "7fffffff", "+W*X-C", fsmNotAligned, "", false, false, false, false);
|
This yielded "The number of search hits for experience is 642 "
Manual yeilded 1 as shown below. (btm image)
The second
| Code: |
memscan_firstScan(MS2, soExactValue, vtWord, rtRounded, goldvalue, "", "00000000", "7fffffff", "+W*X-C", fsmNotAligned, "", false, false, false, false);
|
This yielded "The number of search hits for gold is 227"
Manual yielded 2 as shown below. (top image)
I believe that the settings are different, would someone let me know
1. Is the code scan syntax correct?
2 What settings on the manual need to be checked to make the results similar?
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
51.37 KB |
| Viewed: |
748 Time(s) |
|
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
51.16 KB |
| Viewed: |
749 Time(s) |
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AylinCE
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 32
Joined: 16 Feb 2017
Posts: 1253
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
change:
or
fsmAligned, "4" = result (CE Scan: 26 - FindAndValue scan: 26) ..
fsmAligned, "7" = result (CE Scan: 26 - FindAndValue scan: 2)..
| Code: |
function FindAndValue(find_this)
find_this=tonumber(find_this)
local memscan = createMemScan()
local foundlist = createFoundList(memscan)
memscan.firstScan(soExactValue, vtDword, rtRounded, find_this, nil, 0, "00007fffffffffff", "+W*X-C", fsmAligned, "4", false, false, false, false)
memscan.waitTillDone()
foundlist.initialize()
saved_values = {}
local value = foundlist.Value
local address = foundlist.Address
--print(foundlist.Count)
if foundlist.Count>0 then
for i = 0, foundlist.Count - 1 do
--print(address[i])
res1=readInteger(address[i])
if tonumber(res1)==find_this then
print(i.." - "..address[i].." - "..res1)
end
if i==(foundlist.Count) - 1 then
foundlist.destroy()
memscan.destroy()
end
end
else
foundlist.destroy()
memscan.destroy()
showMessage("Code Not found!")
end
end
FindAndValue(1000)
|
_________________
Last edited by AylinCE on Mon Aug 08, 2022 10:52 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
bknight2602
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 08 Oct 2012
Posts: 577
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 08, 2022 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
That worked in one case currently. This is an old DOS game played under DosBox and I'm not sure why vtWord is/was wrong, since all the remainder of games are played under other emulators and vtWord worked in those table.
Thanks
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
