| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Corroder
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 75
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 1668
|
 Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:04 am Post subject: Assembly Using In CE vs NASM |
 |
|
Maybe this is a stupid question, but I want to know what is CE basic AA programming root type, is it Delphi Assembly?. What is the difference to NASM?. Any references?
Example NASM syntax to print 'Hello World':
| Code: | segment .text
global_start
_start:
mov edx,len
mov ecx,msg
mov ebx,1
mov eax,4
int 0x80
mov eax,1
int 0x80
segment .data
msg db 'Hello, world!',0xa
len equ $ - msg |
_________________
Stealing Code From Stolen Code...
And Admit It.. Hmmm....Typically LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte
Site Admin
 Reputation: 470
Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 25807
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
ce asm is based on the intel assembler syntax
for the rest it uses it's own coding.
The default value type is in hexadecimal (except alloc)
no segments, no sections
built using a single line assembler. Every single line goes to the single line assembler
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OldCheatEngineUser
Whateven rank
 Reputation: 20
Joined: 01 Feb 2016
Posts: 1586
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
there is no delphi assembly, and you cant compare an "assembler" with ce's aa.
as for the syntax CE use masm to denote certain things like segment override and memory location, and of course there are many similarities in CE's AA with masm and nasm.
but all of them sucks tbh. (including tasm)
_________________
About Me;
I Use CE Since Version 1.X, And Still Learning How To Use It Well!
Jul 26, 2020
| STN wrote: | | i am a sweetheart. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Corroder
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 75
Joined: 10 Apr 2015
Posts: 1668
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 5:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
It's clear definition DB and OldCheatEngineUser, so the conclusion I can say CE Asm is base on Intel Assembly x86/x64 language but with custom coding.
Then that is the answer I can't comparing CE Asm with others Assembly programming language such as NASM, MSVC, VMware etc.
CE Asm also has different directives.
I need read again:
https://wiki.cheatengine.org/index.php?title=Cheat_Engine:Auto_Assembler
https://www.felixcloutier.com/x86/
Thanks again
_________________
Stealing Code From Stolen Code...
And Admit It.. Hmmm....Typically LOL |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
OldCheatEngineUser
Whateven rank
Reputation: 20
Joined: 01 Feb 2016
Posts: 1586
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Corroder wrote: | | so the conclusion I can say CE Asm is base on Intel Assembly x86/x64 language |
note that almost 99% of the times people refer to intel syntax by the reading direction, and not how to denote certain things.
intel made only 1 assembler, and their syntax is ugly too similar to tasm.
again nobody care about intel's assembler syntax, but we care about the reading direction that is what it meant by intel syntax.
also keep in-mind, their syntax (all mentioned assemblers) is not flexible and each is different.
_________________
About Me;
I Use CE Since Version 1.X, And Still Learning How To Use It Well!
Jul 26, 2020
| STN wrote: | | i am a sweetheart. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
