Cheat Engine

[xxhehe]

e.g:
1.Ctrl+Enter Enabling "Show relative addresses"
2.Select any Address
3.rightclicked>>>>Copy Selection Address relative Offset Value to clipboard

[Dark Byte]

add this as a .lua file to your autorun folder inside cheat engine

[xxhehe]

[xxhehe]

[FreeER]

The problem with doing that for the address list is... what is it relative to? Those addresses could be in some threads stack or in numerous modules or dynamically allocated outside of any else....some of them like "game.exe"+1234 are relative to a module (in this case, game.exe) and all you have to do to see that is open the address (or just don't have CE attached to anything) others are things like "400238 + 4" or "-4 * 8 + 400000 + 334", both are relative to something because they aren't absolute addresses but should they be considered so and if so then should the last number be considered the offset or would you want the code to parse each part in some way (is -4 a single part by itself or only -4*8, etc.) and pick the largest? Or would you only want it to look for a module name +- some offset?

If you just want to be able to copy offsets for pointers then I made this after seeing Chris from CheatTheGame copying like 12 offsets on video lol It adds a "print offsets" option which will print to the lua engine window both the compact "[[[[[[[$process+124]+04]+44]+24]+878]+34]+134]+348" and with each part on it's own line for easy editing in a script and you can just copy the part you want or simply leave the window open as a reference that doesn't interfere with you using CE. It doesn't copy it to your clipboard for you though so you do have to copy which part you want rather than have it automatically overwrite whatever you had copied.

[xxhehe]

[FreeER]

But processes have multiple modules that addresses can be relative to, some modules can, theoretically anyway, be loaded in different locations each time and using any address that's based on some other module leads to incorrect addresses. And addresses can even exist outside of modules... it's almost like you either didn't read or didn't understand my reply and simply ignored everything I said other than the literal question...

Here's an image showing what I mean, there are two memory viewers open at the same time to two different spots in memory (two different modules in the same process, the CE tutorial). Both have relative addresses of 0, even though the absolute addresses are different.


Actually scrolling through the memory viewer and playing with the relative offsets seems to show that the base address defaults to whatever the previous 1000 address was, eg. if you're at 556EDF then the base address will be 556000 even though the memory region that address is in has an addres of 54F000 (based on the Memory Regions window) which is inside the "Tutorial-i386.exe" module, moving forward to 557EDF which is still within the same memory region (in my test) causes the base to update to 557000 however the relative numbering will only changed when it's toggled.

actually (actually lol), the relative offset doesn't seem to care about the shown base address at all, I just assumed that was relevant. If you use the shortcut (ctrl+enter) it's just whatever byte is at the top of the display window. So if you highlight the first byte (to keep track of the same one) and enable relative offsets the address will be 0, scroll up and toggle relative offsets and it'll change to + something. And if you use the mouse to right click a byte and enable it then it's relative to whatever byte you clicked...

The address list has neither of those to use as a reference. As such it seems kind of like you're just asking for what already exists, right click->change record->address... If it's setup as "process.exe"+someOffset then you'll see that... CE just doesn't seem to do that when you add an address from the memory view so perhaps the real request would be for it to set the address based on the shown relative address (or module if it's in one though whether you'd default to the module or the relative address when it's enabled who knows)...


edit: actually this reminds me of something I've never used (because I don't mess with emulators): http://www.cheatengine.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=5501704 as I've never used it, it may not actually be useful but... it's definitely emulator + base address related

[xxhehe]

[Dark Byte]

Add this to your autorun:

[xxhehe]

[FreeER]

ah, so that's all you wanted. makes sense now

[movss]

ce比od强大