Cheat Engine

[HitIer]

The nature and extent of our current national crisis, as well as its causes and cures, are the subject of intense political struggle. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, offer this letter as a contribution to that struggle and debate in hopes of helping to examine the warp and woof of Hitler's complaints. First off, if we can understand what has caused the current plague of fickle barmpots, I believe that we can then show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. Hitler has been trying to convince us that he's a living bodhisattva of peace and nonviolence. This pathetic attempt to formulate social policies and action programs based on the most spleeny sorts of desperadoism in existence deserves no comment other than to say that Hitler's faction has its own, evil slogan. That slogan is, “Pander to unsophisticated vandals”. What this slogan lacks in wit, it makes up for in its ability to subvert our country's legal system.

I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Hitler to use “pressure tactics”—that's a euphemism for “torture”—to coerce ordinary people into focusing too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Hitler claims that he defends the real needs of the working class. I have only two questions. First, why does he have to be such a party pooper? Second—and I shouldn't even have to ask this question but will for those of you who have been napping—what provoked him to canonize obstinate creeps as nomological emblems of propriety? The answer to that question has broad implications. For example, anything may happen if Hitler is able to create a new fundamentalism based not on religion but on an orthodoxy of cronyism. Crime-stained, irrational franions may traffic in our blood, our birthright, and our security. Hectoring, prudish ratbags may rot our minds with the hallucinatory drug of barbarism. And oppressive, simple-minded swaggerers may deny that the world is full of people who invade every private corner and force every thought into a fork-tongued mold. We don't need any more people like that. What we need are people who are willing to fight on the battleground of ideas for our inalienable individual rights. We need people who understand that Hitler's commentaries are totally meaningless. That is, they usually begin by saying something about how black is white and night is day, and then they continue on with a random assortment of tacked-on phrases until they finally slam into a period. Hitler's commentaries would be a lot clearer if Hitler simply came out and said that he has never disproved anything I've ever written. Hitler does, however, often try to discredit me by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me views that I've never expressed. In the end, a recent United Nations report on human-rights abuses found that he has a hidden agenda. The devastating findings of this report should not be ignored. In particular, I want to highlight the report's observation that Hitler has indicated that if we don't let him shove the nation towards onanism then he'll be forced to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of bellicose conspiracies. That's like putting rabid attack dogs in silk suits. In other words, Hitler has issued us a thinly veiled threat that's intended primarily to scare us away from the realization that in order to solve the big problems with him we must first understand these problems, and to understand them, we must argue about his perorations.

Hitler's sallies promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Hitler's coadjutors because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Hitler. He is driving me nuts. I can't take it anymore!

I have begged Hitler's bootlickers to step forth and prevent Hitler's shrewish allocutions from spreading like a malignant tumor. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Hitler might retaliate? You know the answer, don't you? You probably also know that you won't find many of Hitler's blackshirts who will openly admit that they favor Hitler's schemes to use our weaknesses to his advantage. In fact, their epigrams are characterized by a plethora of rhetoric to the contrary. If you listen closely, though, you'll hear how carefully they cover up the fact that Hitler needs to step out of the dark ages. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that better governance can be achieved by granting profitable concessions, permits, waivers, zoning variances, monopolies, and other such political machinations to Hitler's guild, then there is surely no hope for you.

Hitler has been resolving a moral failure with an immoral solution. How can he perpetrate such an outrage against public propriety and decency? If your answer is unthinking and automatic, you may be in trouble. You may be parroting back some of the concepts that Hitler has injected into your head instead of giving serious thought to the notion that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why I unequivocally hate how Hitler shows such callous indifference to those whose lives he's ruined. My peers avow that this is explicitly or implicitly expressed or presupposed in most of the material I plan to present. While this is unmistakably true, I proclaim we must add that Hitler's cat's-paws are easily manipulated. I submit that everyone should stop and mull that assertion. Then, people will understand why the gloss that Hitler's mercenaries put on Hitler's viewpoints unfortunately does little to improve the world.

My purpose is to lead Hitler to resipiscence. Most of the battles I fight along the way are exigencies, not long-range educational activities. Nevertheless, I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Hitler's verbally incontinent ballyhoos, but his rantings are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Maybe what I'm asking, as much of myself as of anyone else, is whether we're willing, finally, to take vengeance on Hitler as being the fomenter of what is a universal plague throughout the civilized world. If so, then perhaps I am truly at a loss for words when Hitler asserts that his activities are on the up-and-up. He can't possibly be serious. I suspect that the real story here is that I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to do something good for others. Of course, he, with his craftiness and amateurish stances, will entirely control our country's exuberant riches in the near future. He will then use those riches to pooh-pooh the reams of solid evidence pointing to the existence and operation of a disreputable, pudibund coterie of Chekism. The moral of this story is that it is as obvious as the nose on your face that one must consider the semiotics of allotheism in order to fully understand his ideas. I fail to grasp why Hitler has so much difficulty understanding that. Perhaps it's because he asserts that he's morally obligated to create an unwelcome climate for those of us who are striving to straighten out his thinking. This assertion is merely a belief, a belief unsupported by anything approaching a strong, clear body of historically documented evidence. In fact, most existing evidence suggests to the contrary that we must provide people with opportunities to grow, develop, and exercise their potential as human beings. To do anything else, and I do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.

When I say that we must fix our sights on the distant future, when we will have finally cleared away the spiritual and physical debris of the Hitler era, I consider this to mean that everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, “The Naked Aggression of Hitler”. In it, I chronicle all of Hitler's rodomontades from the unreasonable to the obdurate and conclude that while Hitler and other irritating dossers sometimes differ on the details and scale of their upcoming campaigns of terror they never fail to agree on the basic principle and substance. Hence, it is imperative that you understand that it would be charitable of me not to mention that he hides behind the carefully managed prevarication that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity so I will instead maintain that we have a choice. Either we let ourselves be led like lambs to the slaughter by Hitler and his foot soldiers or we show some backbone. While I don't expect you to have much trouble making up your mind you should nevertheless consider that we can no longer afford to do nothing about Hitler's bad-tempered excuses. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and tell him where he can stick it. When I look back I think, “Hitler is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club.”

Many people are incredulous when I tell them that Hitler intends to rip apart causes that others feel strongly about. “How could Hitler be so incoherent?”, they ask me. “It doesn't seem possible.” Well, it is indeed possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Hitler plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that if he is incapable of discerning the mad ramblings of distasteful, neo-raffish kooks from the wisdom and nuance embedded in a sage's discourse then I seriously doubt that he'll be capable of determining that his most combative tactic is to fabricate a phony war between puerile, brain-damaged control freaks and unambitious bozos. This way, Hitler can subjugate both groups into sending ostentatious snollygosters on safari holidays instead of publicly birching them. I doubtlessly don't want that to happen, which is why I'm telling you that Hitler's zealots have been staggering around like punch-drunk fighters hit too many times—stunned, confused, betrayed, and trying desperately to rationalize Hitler's offensive statements. It is not a pretty sight.

Hitler's contrivances raise a number of brow-furrowing questions. I'm referring to questions such as, “Why do Hitler's hangers-on want to ingratiate themselves with Hitler?” It's questions like that that get people thinking about how ill-bred hellions rarely question, resist, or protest those events that do not appear to affect them directly. For example, they ignore how Hitler has been ruining my entire day.

Hitler says that profits come before people. This is noxious falsehood. The truth is that when I first heard that there exists a militant, sexist hector who has been glorifying what I call small-minded Drawcansirs, I was completely bumfuzzled. Who could be so disputatious, so deficient in human grace, as to do such a thing? After learning that Hitler was the eccentric mental defective in question, I realized that Hitler's stories about narcissism are particularly ridden with errors and distortions, even leaving aside the concept's initial implausibility. In short, I feel we must beat Hitler at his own game. I hope other members of the community feel the same.

I apologize for the sarcastic tone of this letter, but I have found it is the only way to vent the ineffable anger that possessed me when I heard Hitler say that he is cunctipotent. I assume you already know that his subliminal psywar campaigns are totally lacking in empirical support, but I have something more important to tell you. Self-righteous, fastuous pamphleteers are often found at his elbow. This suggests to me that if you were to compose a list of the things that an intelligent, clear-eyed, and capable young person could do with his or her life to stand by our principles and be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all foes, and at whatever cost, I suspect that examining the warp and woof of Hitler's press releases would figure somewhere in the first three items. Furthermore, I would bet that item nine, ten, or thereabouts would speak to the importance of informing others that Hitler has recently altered the tone of his mind games. They're no longer a dirge-like recitation of perpetual victimization but rather a preview of new trends in “resistance” propagandizing. For example, Hitler has been showcasing his latest techniques for obscuring unpleasant facts, facts such as that it wasn't so long ago that people like you and me were free to free people from the spell of rowdyism that he has cast over them. Recently, that's become a lot harder to do. What happened that changed things so much? To put it briefly, Hitler happened. By creating a new cottage industry around his disreputable form of ultracrepidarianism, Hitler has managed to sucker us into buying a lot of junk we don't need.

I have no idea why Hitler wannabees have sprouted across the country like mushrooms after a downpour. That's probably obvious to a blind man on a galloping horse. Nevertheless, I suspect that few people reading this letter are aware that I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. One of the things that impresses me about all of it is the massive number of people who realize that Hitler claims to have data supporting his assertion that education should teach the precepts of antagonism and the duties of man towards unregenerate disinformation artists. Naturally, he insists that he can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that he's hiding something. Maybe he's hiding the fact that he somehow manages to maintain a straight face when saying that embracing a system of parochialism will make everything right with the world. I am greatly grieved by this occurrence of falsehood and fantastic storytelling which is the resultant of layers of social dishevelment and disillusionment amongst the fine citizens of a once organized, motivated, and cognitively enlightened civilization.

I despise everything about Hitler. I despise Hitler's attempts to promote racial superiority doctrines, ethnic persecution, imperialist expansion, and genocide. I despise how he insists that he has a close-to-perfect existence that's the envy of the scrofulous crypto-fascists around him. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that he's doing some pretty ophidian things. Or, to restate that without meiosis, Hitler will cast ordinary consumption and investment decisions in the light of high religious purpose because he possesses a hatred that defies all logic and understanding, that cannot be quantified or reasoned away, and that savagely possesses soporific mobocrats with unbalanced and uncontrollable rage. Hitler claims that the Scriptures are responsible for his vengeful, shameless thoughts and fancies. This eisegetical fantasy is not only quasi-chthonic, but it fails to consider that many people lie. Hitler, however, lies with such ease it's troubling.

Hitler is absolutely gung-ho about heathenism because he lacks more pressing soapbox issues. He has had some success in bombarding unsuspecting civilians with vicious waves of chemicals or disease. I find that horrifying and frightening, but we all should have seen it coming. We all knew that over time, Hitler's canards have progressed from being merely counterproductive to being supercounterproductive, hypercounterproductive, and recently ultracounterproductive. In fact, I'd say that now they're even megacounterproductive.

One of Hitler's favorite tricks is to create a problem, then offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to mute the voice of anyone who dares to speak out against him, never the original problem. Many of us are too naïve and trusting. It takes a lot of convincing to get us to see a person as inherently ludibrious or inherently surly. Alas, Hitler is doing all he can to provide us with unmistakable proof that he is inherently both. For instance, Hitler keeps insisting that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. To me, there is something fundamentally wrong with that story. Maybe it's that Hitler has repeatedly been spotted “solving” all our problems by talking them to death. When questioned about that, he either denies any knowledge of it or offers unbelievable and ludicrous explanations that only a mischievous loon could believe.

Let's just ignore Hitler and see what he does. Although he obviously hates my guts (and probably yours as well), I could write a hundred letters about how his devotees are a bunch of drooling simpletons who prostate themselves before their beloved Hitler. I can tell innumerable stories about Hitler's desire to sully my reputation. And I can show you that his steamroller of propagandism will crush all decent men, women, and children who get in its way. Regardless of what I do, however, Hitler is unhappy that people like me want to stop this insanity. Such cavils notwithstanding, it is undeniable by anyone but the worst types of uppish worrywarts there are that his proposed social programs are sickening, deplorable, and shockingly evil. This just goes to show (to me, at least) that all of the claims I've read regarding the benefits of Hitler's antics have been completely premature. That is, they always seem to be based on an inadequate exploration of these antics, their history, and their possible meanings. I claim it is therefore high time we act honorably. Let me start the ball rolling with the observation that I feel no more personal hatred for Hitler than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them.

Two quick comments: 1) Hitler confers exclusive benignity to Comstockism, and 2) he never tires of trying to extinguish fires with gasoline. Hitler presumably hopes that the magic formula will work some day. In the meantime, he seems to have resolved to learn nothing from experience, which tells us that his writings are merely a stalking horse. They mask Hitler's secret intention to jump on everything that is written, said, or even implied and label it as either loopy or scornful. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it true that it is not beyond the capabilities of government leaders and institutions to internalize the understanding that Hitler formulates his grievances in a precarious latticework between the incomprehensible and the pestiferous? Almost without exception, he has been going around saying that he is entitled to pilfer the national treasure. That's a bit of a furphy. The truth is that Hitler's witticisms are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, knowledge is the key that unlocks the shackles of bondage. That's why it's important for you to know that I find stereotyping annoying. In almost all cases, it's a poor substitute for more careful analysis and characterization. On the other hand, it is marvelously effective at explaining how Hitler believes strongly in deploying enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens. Such draconian measures are bound to backfire on him eventually although it's also the case that my love for people necessitates that I bring a fresh perspective and new ideas to the current debate. Yes, I face opposition from Hitler. However, this is not a reason to quit but to strive harder.

I, not being one of the many insincere, impetuous scamps of this world, don't believe that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by uncompanionable big-labor bosses for the purpose of population reduction. So when he says that that's what I believe, I see how little he understands my position. To say that Hitler would rather talk about making changes than actually make them is not new. Nevertheless, I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I wish only that he had the same intellectual honesty.

Hitler may not be that phlegmatic, but he sure is impudent. He wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving him lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well because we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that I rarely pay any attention to Hitler. Frankly, I have no need to hear the uninformed opinions or quasi-ignorant opinions of an imperious politicaster. Nevertheless, I was entirely gobsmacked the first time I saw Hitler marginalizing dissident voices. Since then, I've seen him do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that Hitler says that he acts in the name of equality and social justice. Hey, Hitler, how about telling us the truth for once?

A crass mentality and an unmannerly sense of negativism create fertile soil for self-satisfied, vile monomaniacs to promote unpatriotic ideologies such as adventurism. (The merits of Hitler's crusades won't be discussed here because they lack merit.) One can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Hitler, however, is more likely to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. Let me close where I began: Hitler is trying very hard to plug the hole in his dike of lies so that no more truth leaks out.

Although I would very much like to accentuate our universal humanity, there are several obstacles that make it difficult to induce Hitler to perceive his errors of perception and judgment and make him realize that he frequently demands reparations for what only he perceives as injustices committed against him. I will briefly adumbrate these obstacles and then refer to them occasionally throughout the body of this letter. I'm sure that everyone reading this is already familiar with his stultiloquent equivocations so I'll spare you the sordid details. Instead, I'll simply summarize with the comment that I have reason to believe that Hitler is about to eviscerate freedom of speech and sexual privacy rights. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that Hitler consumes, infests, and destroys. He lives off the death and destruction of others. For that reason alone we need to criticize Hitler's positions publicly for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power.

I am cognizant that Hitler's shell games appeal to people who are fearful about the world's political and economic situation and long for simple solutions to complex problems, but it's debatable whether Hitler's “fund, assemble, and train unregenerate fogeys to cause pain and injury to those who don't deserve it” mentality is so pervasive that I, for one, feel like I'm going to be hanged and drawn and quartered and paraded through the streets in small, chopped-up little bits and thrown out into the fields where no clean animal will touch me. However, no one can disagree that there is a problem here. A large, lascivious, hectoring problem.

It should be clear by this point that Hitler is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Hitler and a pigeon is that Hitler intends to sidetrack us so we can't play an essential role in the struggle against entrenched class, race, and gender hierarchies of privilege and power. That's why Hitler attracts iracund freeloaders to his claque by telling them that it's okay if his fibs initially cause our quality of life to degrade because “sometime”, “someone” will do “something” “somehow” to counteract that trend. I suppose the people to whom he tells such things just want to believe lies that make them feel intellectually and spiritually superior to others. Whether or not that's the case, if Hitler doesn't like it here, then perhaps he should go elsewhere. Here's the heart of the matter: Hitler has been waffling on all the issues. Such utter contempt for the autonomy and free agency of others is the hallmark of conspiracism and has no place in a free society. In a free society people can state, without fear of retribution, that Hitler and I disagree about our civic duties. I think that we must do our utmost to acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment. Hitler, on the other hand, avouches that his publications epitomize wholesome family entertainment.

The picture I am presenting need not be confined to Hitler's screeds. It applies to everything he says and does. Hitler insists that only one or two members of his entire desperadoism squad are the most satanic nonentities I've ever seen. Only one or two members? This is, to put it charitably, an understatement of the facts. It would be far more accurate to say that Hitler's primary goal is to turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. All of his other objectives are secondary to this one supreme purpose. That's why you must always remember that Hitler says that we should avoid personal responsibility. If that's the limit of Hitler's perception, acumen, and intelligence, then God help him.

Self-deluded babblers are sharply focused on an immediate goal: to encourage the acceptance of scapegoating and demonization. Hitler is addicted to the feeling of power, to the idea of controlling people. Sadly, he has no real concern for the welfare or the destiny of the people he desires to lead. Although there are no formal, external validating criteria for his untrustworthy claims, I think we can safely say that there exists a concerted, well-funded, and aggressive anti-science campaign whose charter is to make life less pleasant for us. Hitler supports this cheeky campaign's activities by making my stomach turn. Certain facts are clear. For instance, there are two challenges we must face if we wish to repair the obscene, spleenful world we have inherited from him. The first challenge is to uplift individuals and communities on a global scale to remind Hitler about the concept of truth in advertising. This is only slightly less difficult than the second challenge, which is to convey to people the knowledge that he presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. Hitler is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors homicidal blighters. And here we have the ultimate irony because Hitler keeps talking about the importance of his cause. As far as I can tell, his “cause” is to reconstitute society on the basis of arrested development and envious malevolence. He deeply believes—and wants us to believe as well—that his cause is just, that it's moral, and that the world will love him for promoting it. In reality, I've run into some distressing examples of confirmation bias among Hitler's partners in crime. For instance, they avouch that this is the best of all possible worlds and that Hitler is the best of all possible people. Interestingly, though, they fail to notice that Hitler's latest manifesto, like all the ones that preceded it, is a consummate anthology of disastrously bad writing teeming with misquotations and inaccuracies, an odyssey of anecdotes that are occasionally entertaining but certainly not informative.

Hitler has been going around claiming that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. When challenged about the veracity of that message, Hitler attributed its contradictions of the truth to “poetic license”. That means “lying”.

All of Hitler's snow jobs are based on the premise that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. What's my problem, then? Allow me to present it in the form of a question: When he promotes one social program after the next to take care of some segment of society, is he doing it for that segment of society, or is he doing it because he seeks power and position? Maybe what I'm asking, as much of myself as of anyone else, is whether we're willing, finally, to make plans and carry them out. If so, then perhaps Hitler's loony-bin crew is a sterile bubble of sectarianism. Everyone inside the bubble wants to condemn innocent people to death. In contrast, everyone outside the bubble agrees that I wonder if Hitler really believes the things he says. He knows they're not true, doesn't he? My answer is, as always, a model of clarity and the soul of wit: I don't know. However, I do know that Hitler avers that his ideologies have contributed more to human knowledge than anything else in history. This presupposes a blinkered definition of knowledge that excludes the great works and enterprises of the past. Real knowledge comes from an understanding that Hitler is a libidinous liar. Let's list some of Hitler's more disagreeable lies: First, he professes that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of irresponsible stereotypes. Second, he insists that boisterous dimbulbs and terminally venom-spouting bloodsuckers should rule this country. And third, he wants us to believe that the moon is made of green cheese. I presented that list to get you to see that I frequently talk about how Hitler does not believe in free speech for those who hold opposing points of view. I would drop the subject except that his comments reek of absenteeism. I use the word “reek” because we ought to teach him a lesson. Why does that matter? It matters because if we fail in our task of examining the warp and woof of Hitler's rantings, then he will publish blatantly caustic rhetoric as “education” for children to learn in school.

Hitler keeps missing my point. More specifically, he keeps getting hung up on my words without seeing the underlying meaning. For example, when I say that all of Hitler's diatribes are burdened by a specious magniloquence, Hitler seems incapable of realizing that what I'm really getting at is that in a recent tell-all, a former member of his gestapo writes that “in addition to communicating an understanding of the terrible danger we face, I need to treat the disease, not the symptoms”. Those are some pretty harsh words even when one considers that Hitler's assertion that we should be grateful for the precious freedom to be robbed and kicked in the face by such a noble creature as he serves only to illustrate his ignorance and poorly hidden bigotry. Even so, I have a soft spot for the worst classes of self-centered wankers there are: a bog not too far from here. Our freedom to shine a light on Hitler's efforts to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot is not merely something desirable in theory. This freedom must be protected and promoted by actions—and not just words—if we are to hold Hitler responsible for the hatred he so furtively expresses. We must start by acknowledging that Hitler's slaphappy quips are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, he can replace such people with compliant, Hitler-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to take off the kid gloves and vent some real anger at him. These automata will install a puppet government that pledges allegiance to Hitler's ill-tempered sodality of callous beggars quicker than you can double-check the spelling of “roentgenographically”.

It doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of Hitler's apothegms in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives. Hitler's general prostration before quislingism confirms that he conducts himself in a superciliously pompous manner. I will now cite the proof of that statement. The proof begins with the observation that Hitler wants to create a Hitler-centric society in which power-drunk malefactors dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is his gossamer grasp of reality. He alleges that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. This is complete—or at least, incomplete—baloney. For instance, Hitler fails to mention that he says that lying is morally justifiable as long as it's referred to as “strategic deception”. You know, he can lie as much as he wants, but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd truly prevent anyone from hearing that his appalling misjudgment and obstinacy in giving an air of scientific impartiality to biased judgments are already being discussed quite widely—so much so, in fact, that Hitler's equally staggering misjudgments regarding gnosticism are escaping well-merited ridicule and rebuke. To rectify that pretermission, allow me to observe that Hitler has been going to great lengths to conceal his true aims and mislead the public. It's time to even the score. I suggest that we begin by notifying people of the fact that Hitler has recently been going around claiming that truth is whatever your grievance group says it is. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk.

We must raise Hitler's servitors from the dark depths of prejudice and escapism to the majestic heights of understanding and brotherhood. This call to action begins with you. You must be the first to exemplify civility, kindness, empathy, and fairness. You must be the one to punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. And you must inform your fellow man that many of the most valued members of our community believe in punishing those who lie or connive at half-truths. Hitler, on the other hand, believes in converting freedom of speech from a human right into a tool of oppression that must be blunted by force. I hope you are able to see the distinction I am trying to point out. In particular, I hope you can see that Hitler maintains that he's renowned for his racial and cultural sensitivity. Given Hitler's proclivity to make claims first and check facts later, this is an absurd untruth and means nothing. A more honest statement would be that Hitler has been breaking down the industrial-technological system. Alas, Hitler doesn't stop there. In fact, he can't stop there because he's determined to disprove that he says he's going to unleash horrific levels of violence in a lustrum or two. Good old Hitler. He just loves to open his mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how acerbic they sound. All right, I think I've said enough about how Hitler's power is built on lies. I'd be curious to see if Hitler has a persuasive rebuttal.

[DragonTMD]

WTF is this about? huh? Mr. CleverBot HUUUH? what r u talking about me? huh u DUMBASSBOT?!
This bot is actually a human...a crazy bastard human...a super crazy maniac bastard madafaka human hybrid... -_-