View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
man you're so dumb it pains me to even reply with even the slightest use of my brain. By your logic, it's going to suck since Syd isn't in the band anymore either.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GannoK wrote: | man you're so dumb it pains me to even reply with even the slightest use of my brain. By your logic, it's going to suck since Syd isn't in the band anymore either. | no he specifically said its going to suck because roger waters isn't in it, because he = pink floyd, no other member you name matters to him
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly, it's fucking stupid to think that. besides, David Gilmour has written most of the (imo) best songs pink floyd has ever played
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i personally think that any 1 main band member leaving a band means that they should change their name or something similar, because otherwise theyre just riding on the name, regardless of how good or how meaningful that member is. im glad the remaining members of Joy Division changed the name to New Order, it makes everything clearer and easier to differentiate
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also The Division Bell was without Roger, and that was a fantastic album. to say just because they don't have Roger anymore that it's going to suck, is just retarded.
EDIT: thought this picture was fitting
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
392.93 KB |
Viewed: |
4058 Time(s) |

|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GannoK wrote: | Also The Division Bell was without Roger, and that was a fantastic album. to say just because they don't have Roger anymore that it's going to suck, is just retarded.
EDIT: thought this picture was fitting | kyle i know your autism may find it hard for you to realize this but: people have different opinions than you
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yea, and it's pretty obvious that you all have shit taste and can't appreciate quality music
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GannoK wrote: | yea, and it's pretty obvious that you all have shit taste and can't appreciate quality music | and i recognize that we have different opinions, something you cant do apparently
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No I definitely do understand that some people have stupid as fuck opinions, do you even know how to read? my entire retort is about asinine and unappreciative opinions of Pink Floyd. There is a reason why so many people think they are good, even without Roger Waters. So almost completely objectively, I am certainly in the right. but if you're just going to argue that "lel music opinions are subjective" then you clearly can't analyze music beyond "oh wow this sounds dope."
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dont try to make pink floyd sound like theyre some crazy good band. the reason so many people think theyre good is because theyre entry level and simple. stupid stoners listen to it and sit around going "oh shit this sounds dope". the more accessible something is, the easier it is to analyze.
in this case, it is subjective. clearly shrooms values roger waters sound and contribution to the band a lot, and considers him a valuable part of the band. you even started the thread with "even though roger waters isnt in it", that clearly sounds like you as well as other people value his presence so much that it was the first thing to be brought up
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Shrooms wrote: | Brolock wrote: | dont try to make pink floyd sound like theyre some crazy good band. the reason so many people think theyre good is because theyre entry level and simple. stupid stoners listen to it and sit around going "oh shit this sounds dope". the more accessible something is, the easier it is to analyze.
in this case, it is subjective. clearly shrooms values roger waters sound and contribution to the band a lot, and considers him a valuable part of the band. you even started the thread with "even though roger waters isnt in it", that clearly sounds like you as well as other people value his presence so much that it was the first thing to be brought up |
they were a crazy good band, but not anymore.
david gilmore can suck a cack. |
you have a biased view of the band, therefore extremely subjective and stupid.
brolock, for Pink Floyd being entry level, yea they may or may not be true simply because they are popular. Simple though? you'd have to be a damn moron to make that claim.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
something cant be complex and entry level, thats an oxymoron
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Channel GannoK pffrt
Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 608
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So in comparison, are you telling me that entry level classical, like mozart, is simple? absolutely retarded
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
entry level classical isn't entry level music in general. i didnt say pink floyd were entry level rock, theyre just entry level in general, everyone has heard of them, anyone can pick them up and start listening to them. classical in general is harder for most people to get into than pink floyd.
also some classical is simple, but thats part of what makes it elegant, but that doesn't make it entry level. something can be simple but not entry level, but not complex and entry level, because complexity as a whole is what makes something less accessible. simplicity in genres like drone, minimal techno, ambient, and harsh noise, doesn't make them entry level nor accessible
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|