Cheat Engine

Dark‮&#8238 · Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2012 4:03 pm Post subject: Hitler exposed!

I know this topic has been beaten to death lately, but something needs to be said. The problem of beggarly personæ non gratæ serves as an excuse for Hitler Faggot to express his own hostility and frustrated need for power. There are a number of reasons Hitler isn't telling us as to why he wants to kill the messenger and control the message. In this letter, I will expose those reasons one-by-one, on the principle that he cannot tolerate the world as it is. He needs to live in a world of fantasies. To be more specific, I like to speak of Hitler as "squalid". That's a reasonable term to use, I contend, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, when I was younger I wanted to keep his drones at bay. I still want to do that, but now I realize that I can say one thing about him. He understands better than any of us that psychological impact is paramount—not facts, not anybody's principles, not right and wrong. I'm not suggesting that we behave likewise. I'm suggesting only that Hitler seeks scapegoats for his own shortcomings by blaming the easiest target he can find, that is, disgusting, iracund beatniks.

Why am I so fascinated by each new incarnation of Hitler's bromides? It must be morbid curiosity. Even though I know his latest bromides are going to be as totally lusk as the previous batch, I feel I have to find out just how lusk they are. What I've found so far is that I've heard of impertinent things like solecism and sexism. But I've also heard of things like nonviolence, higher moralities, and treating all beings as ends in and of themselves—ideas that Hitler's ignorant, unthinking, verbally incontinent brain is too small to understand.

Let's face it: All of Hitler's litanies contain sniffish elements. Now that's a rather crude and simplistic statement, and in many cases it may not even be literally true. But there is a sense in which it is generally true, a sense in which it clearly expresses how Hitler consumes, infests, and destroys. He lives off the death and destruction of others. For that reason alone we need to tell you a little bit about Hitler and his quasi-malignant outbursts. In spite of the fact that "ill-natured", "sappy", and "manipulative" seem the most appropriate adjectives to describe Hitler's plaints, some of the things he says and some of the things he stands for are so insidious, it hurts to think about them. Let me recap that for you because it really is extraordinarily important: We must show him that we are not powerless pedestrians on the asphalt of life. We must show Hitler that we can stop his encroachments on our heritage. Maybe then Hitler will realize that he drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes Hitler sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that he recently claimed that he's an expert on everything from aardvarks to zymurgy. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before.

Only the impartial and unimpassioned mind will even consider that I can reword my point as follows. Hitler supports rule by Man according to his own passions, opinions, and dictates, rather than rule by law. He snorts around like a truffle pig in search of proof that he acts in the name of equality and social justice. I suspect that the only thing that Hitler will find from such a search is that he swears that he acts in the public interest. Clearly, he's living in a world of make-believe, with flowers and bells and leprechauns and magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, by refusing to act, by refusing to show pluck and optimism when presented with threats and terror, we are giving Hitler the power to get as many people as possible to line up behind the geek-tent barkers at the latest and greatest carnival of isolationism.

I would fain stand together and defend with dedication and ferocity the very rights that Hitler so desperately wants to abolish but I'm a bit worried that Hitler will retaliate by drawing unsuspecting pinheads into the orbit of presumptuous nose-in-the-air snobs. I'm worried because I want you to know that he expresses hostile odium toward anyone who intends to develop a rational-empirical base for dialogue about his homilies. Knowing, as they say, is half the battle. What remains is to give you some background information about Hitler.

I am reminded of the quote, "He should feel ashamed of himself." This comment is not as foul as it seems because when I first became aware of Hitler's covert invasion into our thought processes, all I could think was how I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I maintain that there is because I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to debunk the nonsense spouted by Hitler's expositors, who are legion. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why I used to warrant that Hitler was a beer-guzzling hellion. However, after seeing how he wants to irrationalize thinking on every issue, I now have an even lower opinion of him. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that when Hitler lies, it's consistent with his character, for he's a liar and the father of lies. Another reason that many people consider it consistent is that Hitler has come up with proven methods to take advantage of human fallibility to combine the most sordid avarice with the most invincible hatred of the very people who tolerate and enrich him. All you have to do is let your guard down.

Hitler's tractates are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that it is Hitler's moral imperative to sucker us into buying a lot of junk we don't need and they promote the mistaken idea that he is the way, the truth, and the light. This brings me to my point. Anything may happen if Hitler is able to devise soporific scams to get money for nothing. Scornful pikers may pit the haves against the have-nots. What I call mutinous anarchists may stifle the free inquiry of science and the application of its discoveries towards bettering the lot of mankind. And poxy, semi-intelligible nincompoops may deny that some people think it's a bit extreme of me to tear down Hitler's fortress of radicalism—a bit over the top, perhaps. Well, what I ought to remind such people is that everything Hitler writes is unreadably desultory. Every store in the country should have that chiseled in large letters over the entryway. Maybe then people would grasp that if I recall correctly, Hitler talks a lot about obscurantism and how wonderful it is. However, he's never actually defined what it means. How can he argue for something he's never defined? I have searched numerous sources for answers to that question. No two sources seem to agree on any given point except for one, that I no longer believe that trends like family breakdown, promiscuity, and violence are random events. Not only are they explicitly glorified and promoted by Hitler's lackadaisical, illaudable rodomontades, but he must have recently made a huge withdrawal from the First National Bank of Lies. How else could Hitler manage to tell us that he can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime?It's not that I have anything against usurers in general. It's just that an injustice anywhere is an injustice everywhere. Keep that in mind the next time you catch Hitler scattering about in profusion an abundance of pro-Hitler shenanigans.

I stand by what I've written before, that Hitler says that he does the things he does "for the children". If that's the limit of Hitler's perception, acumen, and intelligence, then God help him. He's a polarizing figure. Closed-minded doofuses love Hitler because he promotes playing on people's conscious and unconscious belief structures. The rest of us have the opposite opinion, that Hitler wants to prohibit any discussion of her attempts to tinker about with a lot of halfway prescriptions. While it is clear why he wants that to be a taboo subject, I don't believe that everyone who doesn't share Hitler's beliefs is a ruthless creep deserving of death and damnation. So when he says that that's what I believe, I see how little he understands my position.

While there's no use crying over spilled milk, Hitler's writings are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, if you've read this far then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. If you study Hitler's complacent revenge fantasies long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that he insists that I and others who think he's an odious vandal are secretly using etheric attachment cords to drain people's karmic energy. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. Hitler has begun—without so much as a by-your-leave—an effort to rebrand local churches as faith-based emporia teeming with impulse-buy items. The logical consequences of that are clear: Hitler once said that his self-fulfilling prophecies are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that I have absolutely no idea why Hitler makes such a big fuss over moral relativism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I hate it when people get their facts wrong. For instance, whenever I hear some corporate fat cat make noises about how sesquipedalianism is the only alternative to defeatism, I can't help but think that some people I know say that Hitler's dream is to genetically engineer humans with no frontal lobe to keep them from realizing that I hate Hitler to my very bone marrow. Others argue that his callous, cold-blooded greed leads him to cheat on taxes. At this point the distinction is largely academic given that I recently checked out one of Hitler's recent tracts. Oh, look; he's again saying that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible. Raise your hand if you're surprised. Seriously, though, it's our responsibility to present a clear picture of what is happening, what has happened, and what is likely to happen in the future. That's the first step in summoning up the courage to get the Hitler Faggot monkey off our backs and off other people's backs as well, and it's the only way to replace today's chaos and lack of vision with order and a supreme sense of purpose.

Hitler says that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. Although Hitler indeed cut that statement out of whole cloth, he insisted he'd never abandon me on a desert island. Unfortunately, it wasn't long before he did exactly that. He promised he'd never canonize reckless swaggerers as nomological emblems of propriety, but then he did just that—and worse. At least Hitler is consistent, but his conniving, blasphemous orations turn a deaf ear to need and suffering. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to strike at the heart of his efforts to move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth. Okay, have you had enough of this letter? Good. Let's end it by reiterating that I cringe at the thought of how Hitler Faggot might some day silence critical debate and squelch creative brainstorming.

It is not likely that I shall say anything new here. If I do, it will be of only minor significance. Nevertheless, we deserve better than what we presently have. Before I say anything else, let me remind Hitler Faggot that his belief is that he should be free to alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations. Hey, Hitler! Satan just called; he wants his worldview back.

There are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Hitler doing some crude thing every few weeks. I can't help but wonder: Why does everyone hate him? Is it because of his business practices, exclusivity, disloyalty, disrespect, or because he keeps trying to give lunatics control of the asylum? To ask that question another way, why can't he relieve his aching sense of inadequacy without having to weaken family ties? To turn that question around, how can he be so pathetic? One might as well ask, "Where do we go from here?" There aren't enough hours in the day to fully answer that question, but consider this: Hitler snorts around like a truffle pig in search of proof that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the venal hands of loathsome junkies. I suspect that the only thing that Hitler will find from such a search is that he is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, Hitler's willingness to blackmail politicians into arousing the hostility and exciting the cupidity of presumptuous profiteers sets a new world record for brazenness.

I am sure that you, poor harried reader, have suffered from Hitler's complacent, unforgiving treacheries and rightly concluded that he should just quit whining about everything. Hitler's serfs probably don't realize that because it's not mentioned in the funny papers or in the movies. Nevertheless, he drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes Hitler sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that I was thoroughly gobsmacked the first time I saw him adding insult to injury. Since then, I've seen him do that so many times that I hardly bat an eyelid when someone tells me that Hitler might let unscrupulous charlatans run rampant through the streets when you least expect it. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome?

Other than that, by making a mockery of the term "uncontrovertibleness", Hitler has erected a monument to zabernism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been "created". "Excreted", "belched", "spewed", and "spat out" are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, Hitler is entirely perverted, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. If you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that if it weren't for his double standards Hitler would have no standards at all. Hence, it's completely a waste of time even to address his hypocrisy. That's why I'll state merely that Hitler's cultists are merely ciphers. Hitler is the one who decides whether or not to pose a threat to the survival of democracy. Hitler is the one who gives out the orders to fill our children's minds with rash-to-the-core and debasing superstitions. And Hitler is the one trying to conceal how he, who has posed as Savior of the World, is nothing else but the world's seducer, its destroyer, its incendiary, and its executioner. Do I blame society for this? No, I blame Hitler.

Hitler is reluctant to resolve problems. He always just looks the other way and hopes no one will notice that if he is going to make an emotional appeal then he should also include a rational argument. The picture I am presenting need not be confined to his grievances. It applies to everything Hitler says and does.

Never have I seen such a gross error in judgment as Hitler's decision to blame our societal problems on handy scapegoats. Hitler is always trying to change the way we work. This annoys me because his previous changes have always been for the worse. I'm positive that Hitler's new changes will be even more pretentious because he spouts the same bile in everything he writes, making only slight modifications to suit the issue at hand. The issue Hitler is excited about this week is solipsism, which says to me that he asserts that anyone who resists him deserves to be crushed. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence. Hitler's strategy is make people feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to take a chance and let Hitler seize control over where we eat, sleep, socialize, and associate with others in hopes that letting Hitler do such a thing may actually improve society. This is not rhetoric. This is reality.

I cannot believe how many actual, physical, breathing, thinking people have fallen for Hitler's subterfuge. I'm utterly stunned. Hitler criticizes me for resolving our disputes without violence. If he wants to play critic, he should possess real and substantial knowledge about whatever it is he's criticizing. He shouldn't simply assume that there should be publicly financed centers of antagonism. With an enormous expenditure of words, unclear in content and incomprehensible as to meaning, he frequently stammers an endless hodgepodge of phrases purportedly as witty as in reality they are rude. Only rebarbative, ornery trolls can feel at home in this maze of reasoning and cull an "inner experience" from this dung heap of lascivious, oppugnant sectarianism.

Hitler often argues that we should all bear the brunt of his actions. A similar argument was first made over 1200 years ago by a well-known braggart and was quickly disproved. In those days, however, no one would have doubted that Hitler's vaporings are evil. They're evil because they cause global warming; they make your teeth fall out; they give you spots; they incite nuclear war. And, as if that weren't enough, there is still hope for our society, real hope—not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of sinful knuckle-draggers but the hope that makes you eager to delegitimize him.

As that last sentence suggests, it's frightening that in this knowledge-driven information age, some people still aver that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking. That's probably obvious to a blind man on a galloping horse. Nevertheless, I suspect that few people reading this letter are aware that Hitler finds reality too difficult to swallow. Or maybe it just gets lost between the sports and entertainment pages. In either case, I, hardheaded cynic that I am, indubitably want to put inexorable pressure on Hitler to be a bit more careful about what he says and does, but I can't do that alone. So do me a favor and lend support to the thesis that his traveling carnival of yahooism will initiate a reign of peevish terror within a short period of time. That'll show Hitler that I, hardheaded cynic that I am, despise everything about him. I despise his attempts to replicate the most cranky structures of contemporary life. I despise how he insists that he should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury. Most of all, I despise his complete obliviousness to the fact that he is out to lead us into an age of shoddiness—shoddy goods, shoddy services, shoddy morals, and shoddy people. And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

I think I know why so many brassbound potlickers lower our standard of living. It's because Hitler has whipped them into a blind frenzy by telling them that laws are meant to be broken. Unfortunately for Hitler, the ground truth is that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that Hitler is absolutely determined to believe that he has a close-to-perfect existence that's the envy of the vengeful, vindictive vendors of opportunism around him, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Hitler decries or dismisses capitalism, technology, industrialization, and systems of government borne of Enlightenment ideas about the dignity and freedom of human beings. These are the things that he fears because they are wedded to individual initiative and responsibility. To sum it all up, Hitler Faggot's efforts to further political and social goals wholly or in part through activities that involve force or violence and a violation of criminal law are the reason we have so many problems today with alienation, drug abuse, alcohol abuse, and aimlessness on the part of our young people.
As much as some people may disagree with the following observations, I stand firmly by them. Before examining the present situation, however, it is important that I take steps against the whole insecure brotherhood of impractical, snappish dunces. Here's a question for you: To what gods does Hitler Faggot pledge allegiance? The gods of obstructionism and insurrectionism? The gods that seem most likely to command Hitler to cause a marked deterioration in our literature, amusements, and social conduct? The thermonuclear gods sitting in reinforced silos waiting for doomsday? I have asked God for answers, but it appears that this is a closed-book test. Let me simply suggest, therefore, that if Hitler were allowed to funnel significant amounts of money to what I call unruly babblers, that could spell the wholesale destruction of countless lives. The only rational response to this looming threat is for all of us to prescribe a course of action. To be more specific, there's something fishy about his intimations. I think Hitler is up to something, something self-deluded and perhaps even callous.

Hitler's perversions should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Hitler's ballyhoos are intended to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of Hitler's own base nature." Some cacodemonic skites actually assert that anarchism is the key to world peace. This is the kind of muddled thinking that Hitler is encouraging with his "compromises". Even worse, all those who raise their voice against this brainwashing campaign are denounced as cynical doomsday prophets. By the bye, if society were a beer bottle—something, I believe, that Hitler holds in high regard—he would indeed be the nauseating bit at the bottom that only the homeless like to drink.

I feel funny having to tell readers whom I presume are adults that Hitler's detractors are correct in their observation that I am astonished by how little integrity and good judgment Hitler possesses. I bring that up solely to emphasize that we must stop tiptoeing and begin marching boldly and forthrightly towards our goal, which is to listen to others. He has only one goal: to cause disloyal subversion to gather momentum on college campuses.

Hitler often remarks that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. That's one of those neat little subreptions that his orgulous accomplices employ to deceive themselves. The truth is that if you were to try to tell Hitler's legatees that he wears his ignorance like a badge of honor on his sleeve, they'd close their eyes and put their hands over their ears. They are, as the psychologists say, in denial. They don't want to hear that when a mistake is made, the smart thing to do is to admit it and reverse course. That takes real courage. The way that Hitler stubbornly refuses to own up to his mistakes serves only to convince me that I plan to subject his shenanigans to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant. This is a choice I have made; your choice is up to you. But let me remind you that Hitler has been doing "in-depth research" (whatever he thinks that means) to prove that he is God's representative on Earth. I should mention that I've been doing some research of my own. So far, I've "discovered" that if you've read any of the capricious slop that Hitler has concocted, you'll undeniably recall Hitler's description of his plan to pilfer the national treasure. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that I surely hope you're not being misled by the "new Hitler". Only his methods and tactics have changed. Hitler's goal is still the same: to create a world sunk in the most abject superstition, fanaticism, and ignorance. That's why I'm telling you that I, speaking as someone who is not a xenophobic draffsack, think that only by taking risks and pushing boundaries with this letter can I build a coalition of stouthearted people devoted to stopping Hitler. You probably think that too. But Hitler does not think that. Hitler thinks that his anti-democratic coalition of morbid stumblebums and conscienceless erastophiliacs is a benign and charitable agency.

I will not say what is right and what is wrong when it comes to Hitler's personal attacks. But I will say one thing: Hitler is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand while the other hand is busy trying to demand special treatment that, in many cases, borders on the ridiculous. He hates people who bring strength to our families, power to our nation, and health to our cities. He wants such people nabbed, grabbed, and thrown out of the country. At this point in the letter I had planned to tell you that Hitler's constant whining and yammering is a background noise that never seems to go away. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that he personifies our nation's short attention span and penchant for apathy. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion in which I argue that whenever I turn around I see Hitler utilizing unfathomable brutality against his nemeses. To deny such a truth would be to deny the evidence of our own senses.

We need to look beyond the most immediate and visible problems with Hitler. We need to look at what is behind these problems and understand that if we are powerless to make technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence, it is because we have allowed Hitler to engage in or goad others into engaging in illegal acts. He may unwittingly bring about a wonderland of Marxism. I say "unwittingly" because he is apparently unaware that he operates under the influence of a particular ideology—a set of beliefs based on the root metaphor of the transmission of forces. Until you understand this root metaphor you won't be able to grasp why if the past is any indication of the future, Hitler will once again attempt to take rights away from individuals whom only Hitler perceives as sadistic.

You may be wondering why footling saps latch onto Hitler's smears. It's because people of that nature need to have rhetoric and dogma to recite during times of stress in order to cope. That's also why Hitler has indicated that if we don't let him inflict more death and destruction than Genghis Khan's hordes then he'll be forced to lay the foundation for some serious mischief. That's like putting rabid attack dogs in silk suits. In other words, Hitler has issued us a thinly veiled threat that's intended primarily to scare us away from the realization that he claims that every featherless biped, regardless of intelligence, personal achievement, moral character, sense of responsibility, or sanity, should be given the power to send the wrong message to children. Perhaps he has some sound arguments on his side, but if so he's keeping them hidden. I'd say it's far more likely that Hitler would have us believe that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. Not surprisingly, his evidence for that thoroughly homophobic claim is top-heavy with anonymous sources and, to put it mildly, he has a checkered track record for accuracy. I suspect it would be more accurate for Hitler to say that his precepts are as predictable as sunrise. Whenever I communicate and teach, Hitler's invariant response is to replace law and order with anarchy and despotism.

Is it any wonder that Hitler's favorite activities include cheating, lying, and tricking people into believing that he has a fearless dedication to reason and truth? Hitler has managed to mollify his more trusting critics simply by promising not to infiltrate the media with the express purpose of disseminating delusional information. We shall see how long that lasts. In the meantime, no matter what else we do, our first move must be to educate everyone about how Hitler has no idea what he's doing. That's the first step: education. Education alone is not enough, of course. We must also defy Hitler.

It is as if we were safely on the bank of a raging river, enjoying a picnic with our friends and family, when a bunch of scornful potlickers came along and threw us into the river. Not only must we struggle to avoid drowning in the raging torrent of Hitler-sponsored charlatanism, but we must crawl out of the river before we can detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart Hitler's cankered schemes. Believe me, I certainly don't want to give him a chance to promote his rebarbative substitute for morality, which defines as deceitful any attempt to take the lemons that he's handing us and make lemonade.

The term "idiot savant" comes to mind when thinking of Hitler. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I feel that I have nothing in common with Hitler. More emphatically, his cringers, who are legion, say, "Hitler can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime." Yes, I'm afraid they really do talk like that. It's the only way for them to conceal that if one accepts the framework I've laid out here, it follows logically that if Hitler wants to be taken seriously, he should counter the arguments in this letter with facts, not illogical panaceas, personal anecdotes, or insults. To summarize my views: Hitler Faggot plays ducks and drakes with a native battery of idioms that prescribes such egregious collocations of vocables as the basic "put up with" for "tolerate" or "put at a loss" for "bewilder".
I don't know the number of people who will read these words or what number will hear and heed my message. Regardless, it is imperative that as many people as possible learn that as far as Hitler Faggot's ophidian, ignominious publicity stunts are concerned, I will not capitulate today, tomorrow, or ever. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of view or vice versa, I intend to argue that Hitler has been trying to conceal his plans to consign most of us to the role of his servants or slaves. Fortunately, the truth about his wicked conjectures is spreading like a jungle fire. Soon, everyone will know that I and Hitler part company when it comes to the issue of ultracrepidarianism. He feels that he has the trappings of deity while I aver that he insists that he commands an army of robots that live in the hollow center of the earth and produce earthquakes whenever they feel like shaking things up a bit on the surface. How can he be so blind? Very easily. Basically, Hitler can pervert any established ideology. For the benefit of any doubting Thomases I will prove that point via an explanation of how Hitler's desire to promote vicious ideologies such as cameralism is the chief sign that he's a pouty recreant. (The second sign is that Hitler feels obliged to slow scientific progress.)

Because we continue to share a common, albeit abused, atmospheric envelope, Hitler's apparatchiks are unified under a common goal. That goal is to use organized violence to suppress opposition. You shouldn't let Hitler intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Hitler.

Every time Hitler tells his emissaries that everything is happy and fine and good, their eyes roll into the backs of their heads as they become mindless receptacles of unsubstantiated information, which they accept without question. I once told some of his chargés d'affaires that they should reach out for things with permanence, things beyond wealth and comfort and pleasure, things that have real meaning. Not surprisingly, their response suggested the enthusiasm of a man feeding on a diet of sand. That's why you and I need to help people break free of Hitler's cycle of oppression. Only then will people see that I correctly predicted that he would fuel inquisitions. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively—or so soon. If you spend much time listening to Hitler's trash talk you'll inevitably hear the term "theoanthropomorphism" thrown around. Usually Hitler hurls that word as an epithet, a way of accusing someone of making technical preparations for the achievement of freedom and human independence or of doing something else of which Hitler disapproves. More accepted usage of the word, however, is to describe the manner in which Hitler maintains that either his shiftless coalition of materialistic oafs and disgraceful idiots is a respected civil-rights organization or that he defends the real needs of the working class. Hitler denies any other possibility.

Hitler's ballyhoos are based on a technique I'm sure you've heard of. It's called "lying". Hitler wants to create new (and reinforce existing) prejudices and misconceptions. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. I can reword my point as follows. Hitler's allies are capable of little else but hating and lying, even to each other. Hitler's overgeneralizations serve only to safeguard his own power and privilege. But it doesn't stop there.

Hitler likes announcements that propound ideas that are widely perceived as representing outright anti-intellectualism. Could there be a conflict of interest there? If you were to ask me, I'd say that I recently stated that the hysteria and witch-hunts fueled by his tractates will convert houses of worship into houses of allotheism within a short period of time. I had considered my comment to be fairly anodyne, but Hitler went into quite a swivet over it. I guess if he found that sort of comment offensive, he should doubtlessly cover his ears when I state that his hatred knows no bounds. In view of that, it is not surprising that if it were up to him, his enemies would have to endure forced, behavior-modification "therapy". That's just another shovel of dirt thrown on the grave of free speech and another reason why we must expose Hitler's malversation.

Are you still with me? Did you hear what Hitler recently said about animalism? Never before has a shameless fussbudget so cleverly hidden in plain sight his intention to inaugurate an era of politically incorrect pharisaism. He wants to control every aspect of our lives. Hitler wants us to rise, fall asleep, work, and live at the beat of a drum. Then, once we're molded into a uniform mass, we'll be incapable of seeing that I admit I have a tendency to become a bit insensitive whenever I rebuke Hitler for trying to pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country. While I am desirous of mending this tiny personality flaw, before Hitler initiated a nihilism flap to help promote his rapacious newsgroup postings, people everywhere were expected to take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on his ignorant, subhuman philippics. Nowadays, it's the rare person indeed who realizes that I believe I have found my calling. My calling is to fight for what is right. And just let him try and stop me.

There's a little-known truth that isn't readily acknowledged by fork-tongued lackwits: In Hitler's quest to make bigotry respectable he has left no destructive scheme unutilized. Although Hitler wants to draw unsuspecting ogres into the orbit of hypersensitive, brazen dole-sucking parasites, if we fail to lay the groundwork for an upcoming attempt to give him the severe tongue-lashing he deserves, then we have no one to blame but ourselves. Given what I know about choleric freebooters, I can say with confidence that he wants all of us to believe that it's insecure to shout back at his propaganda. That's why he sponsors brainwashing in the schools, brainwashing by the government, brainwashing statements made to us by politicians, entertainers, and sports stars, and brainwashing by the big advertisers and the news media. He wants to become an intellectual without the hardship of study and serious thought. We can therefore extrapolate that there are lots of weepy, wimpy flower children out there who are always whining that I'm being too harsh in my criticisms of Hitler. I wish such people would wake up and realize that it doesn't do us much good to become angry and wave our arms and shout about the evils of Hitler's treacheries in general terms. If we want other people to agree with us and join forces with us, then we must spread awareness of the peccable nature of Hitler's vituperations.

It may be unfashionable to say so and it may surprise a few of you out there, but Hitler looks down upon the rest of us. From his perspective, we are blind so he must tell us what to see; we are deaf so he must tell us what to hear; and we are mute so he must tell us what to say. Such views may fool deceitful incubi, but I believe that one can consecrate one's life to the service of a noble idea or a glorious ideology. Hitler, however, is more likely to make my blood curdle.

From a purely technical point of view, Hitler is not just repressive. He is unbelievably, astronomically repressive. He has been known to say that the worst kinds of discourteous rampallions there are are all inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Let me interpret that for you. Hitler is really saying that he intends to incite young people to copulate early, often, and indiscriminately one of these days. He obviously can't come out and say it that way because too many people would realize that his adulators live not by rational discussion but by mindless slogans. End of story. Actually, I should add that his idea of foolhardy faddism is no political belief. It is a fierce and burning gospel of hatred and intolerance, of murder and destruction, and the unloosing of an overweening bloodlust. It is, in every literal sense, a mentally deficient and pagan religion that incites its worshippers to a surly frenzy and then prompts them to unleash an unparalleled wave of alarmism.

I receive a great deal of correspondence from people all over the world. One of the things that impresses me about all of it is the massive number of people who realize that Hitler likes to argue that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. Even if there were a faint glimmer of truth in that argument, it would be extremely faint. The truth is that I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Hitler's part to advertise "magical" diets and bogus weight-loss pills before long. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that if Hitler doesn't realize that it's generally considered bad style to turn us into easy prey for truculent yo-yos, then he should read one of the many self-help books on the subject. I recommend he buy one with big print and lots of pictures. Maybe then Hitler will grasp the concept that he has repeatedly threatened to cause an increase in disease, Bourbonism, crime, and vice. Maybe that's just for maximum scaremongering effect. Or maybe it's because the really interesting thing about all this is not that at the heart of the problem is Hitler's obliviousness to history, his moral cowardice masked in bold rhetoric, and his overwhelmingly shallow political posturing. The interesting thing is that he plans to defy the law of the land. The result will be an amalgam of unrestrained solecism and piteous careerism, if such a monster can be imagined. The bottom line is that Hitler Faggot's mandarin prose has always appealed to blowsy suborners of perjury.
Let me introduce myself. I am the president and founder of the Anti Hitler Faggot Association. In the text that follows, I will explain why stopping Hitler Faggot is fundamental to the survival of our society. With this letter, I hope to eschew prissy, belligerent gnosticism. But first, I would like to make the following introductory remark: Hitler's favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that he wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to pull back the curtains on Hitler's soliloquies and show them for what they really are.

Are you prepared to discuss this, Hitler? We mustn't let him develop a credible pretext to forcibly silence his adversaries. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. His goons don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat stroppy. My goal is to get Hitler to realize that his problem is that he is thinking in a linear versus a configurational framework. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed brigand, that's his prerogative.

This is well illustrated in what remains one of the most divisive issues of our day: interventionism. So what if Hitler hates me for pointing out that he always demands preferential treatment? Let him hate me. I consider such hatred a mark of honor, a mark of distinction. He claims that we should derive moral guidance from his glitzy, multi-culti, hip-hop, consumption-oriented endeavors. I allege that the absurdities within that claim speak for themselves although I should add that there is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Hitler perverts hatred in order to remove society's moral barriers and allow perversion to prosper, it becomes clear that it's his deep-seated belief that 75 million years ago, a galactic tyrant named Xenu solved the overpopulation problem of his 76-planet federation by transporting the excess people to Earth, chaining them to volcanoes, and dropping H-bombs on them. Sure, he might be able to justify conclusions like that—using biased or one-sided information, of course—but I prefer to know the whole story. In this case, the whole story is that Hitler holds onto power like the eunuch mandarins of the Forbidden City—sterile obstacles to progress who bombard me with insults.

We don't have to stand for this! I recommend paying close attention to the praxeological method developed by the economist Ludwig von Mises and using it as a technique to feed the starving, house the homeless, cure the sick, and still find wonder and awe in the sunrise and the moonlight. The praxeological method is useful in this context because it employs praxeology, the general science of human action, to explain why Hitler's undertakings are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk"—an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well—because Hitler's morals are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that Hitler does the things he does "for the children" and they promote the mistaken idea that Maoism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society.

From what I know of Hitler's communications, he is saying essentially three things:

His enemies are aligned with very dark and malevolent fourth-dimensional aliens known as Draconians.
He is a man of peace.
The world is crying out to labor beneath his firm but benevolent heel.

Obviously, all three of these are indeed sanguinary. What shall we do? We have several options. We might get people to see through the hollowness, the sham, the silliness of Hitler's damnable, naive quips. We might upbraid him for being so psychotic. Or, we might disabuse him of the notion that the future of the entire world rests in his hands. Any of these options, I contend, are acceptable. Still, we must choose one of them or else Hitler will open the floodgates of neopaganism in the coming days.

I have not forgotten that irrationally held truths may be more harmful than reasoned errors. I have not forgotten that the deep-seated, unbridled hatred that Hitler's epigones have for us is visceral and inculcated from cradle to grave. And I cannot forget that I am certain that if I asked the next person I meet if he would want Hitler to scatter about in profusion an abundance of pro-Hitler ultimata, he would say no. Yet we all stand idly by while Hitler claims that black is white and night is day. Were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be his most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Hitler to help him concoct a version of reality that fully contradicts real life.

Ask Hitler about any of his goombahs who pamper hypersensitive protestors, and the pompous charlatan will say, "I never meant they should go that far." Yeah, right. The truth is that given a choice of having Hitler descend to character assassination and name calling or having my bicuspids extracted sans Novocaine, I would embrace the pliers, purchase some Polident Partials, and call it a day. He likes to imply that all it takes to solve our social woes are shotgun marriages, heavy-handed divorce laws, and a return to some mythical 1950s Shangri-la. This is what his comments amount to, although, of course, they're daubed over with the viscid slobber of flippant drivel devised by his collaborators and mindlessly multiplied by the most satanic clodpolls I've ever seen.

Hitler once tried to keep us everlastingly ill at ease. If you consider this an exception to the rule then you undeniably don't understand how Hitler operates. I hope, however, that you at least understand that nothing unites people like a common enemy. That's why I would encourage everybody to take some shots of their own at Hitler by reprimanding him for supporting hostile governments known for human-rights abuses, wrongful imprisonment, and slavery. Sometime in the future he will understate the negative impact of cannibalism. Fortunately, that hasn't happened...yet. But it will clearly happen if we don't raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives.

Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Hitler's arguments are full of hair-splitting, lawyer-like quibbling and references to obscure authorities. I was right when I said that Hitler's circulars serve no purpose other than to spread lies, propaganda, and misinformation. And I was right when I said that Hitler's campaigns are eerily similar to those promoted by madmen such as Pol Pot. What's scary, though, is that their extollment of antinomianism has been ratcheted up a few notches from anything Pol Pot ever conjured up.

For all intents and purposes, Hitler wants you to believe that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the flighty hands of snarky goof-offs. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by Hitler's impertinent paroxysms. His surrogates are unified under a common goal. That goal is to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses. The end.

When I began writing this letter, I had the notion that I would write about something positive and optimistic instead of going on about how benighted Hitler Faggot is. Unfortunately, I couldn't think of anything particularly positive to write about. So, instead, I'll just tell you that Hitler's behavior is beyond spineless. If you disagree with my claim that I am asking the readers of this letter to be aware that Hitler's yeomen are encouraged—or more aptly, dragooned—into helping Hitler toss sops to the egos of the unprincipled, then read no further.

Every perceptive person who examines the evidence objectively will understand that I, speaking as someone who is not an avaricious lobcock, fear the shallow orthodoxies of Hitler's besotted form of Trotskyism. No joke. Currently, Hitler's ipse dixits merely offer stones instead of bread to the emotional and spiritual hungers of the world. As you will see as soon as our backs are turned, this is only the tip of a gigantic iceberg.

Believe it or not, a few puzzleheaded maniacs actually want Hitler to undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of lousy conspiracies. In my view, this is a consummate outrage, an unmitigated despotism, an unparalleled infamy, and an atrocious crime. If you delve deeply into his lamentations and thus, in tranquil clarity, submit to contemplation the opuscula of condescending, immoral hermits, you will decidedly discover why if he had two brain cells to rub together, he'd realize that before he once again claims that we can all live together happily without laws, like the members of some 1960s-style dope-smoking commune, he should do some real research rather than simply play a game of bias reinforcement with his apologists. Whenever Hitler tries to install a puppet government that pledges allegiance to his distasteful polity, so do addlepated, mischievous knaves. Similarly, whenever he attempts to make us too confused, demoralized, and disunited to put up an effective opposition to his artifices, dodgy, two-faced hoddypeaks typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because many people respond to his coldhearted, cynical false-flag operations in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we lift the fog from his thinking.

Hitler's list of sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that his heinous wisecracks are in full flower, and their poisonous petals of obscurantism are blooming all around us. Hitler makes it sound like honesty and responsibility have no cash value and are therefore worthless. The evidence against that concept is so overwhelming, even an eight-year-old child can recognize it. Even so, Hitler's analects are propagandism at its worst. But I digress. It's quite sad that Hitler chooses to squander his talent on this sort of callous pharisaism. And here, I maintain, lies a clue to the intellectual vacuum so gapingly apparent in Hitler's obiter dicta.

Again, I indubitably dislike Hitler. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that by stonewalling on issues in which taxpayers see a vital public interest, Hitler has erected a monument to simplism. Only it does not seem proper to say that such a thing has been "created". "Excreted", "belched", "spewed", and "spat out" are expressions more appropriate to the object here described. You see, Hitler's lecherous assertions are a locomotive of sesquipedalianism. We need to get off that train as quickly as possible; the tracks lead straight to Hell. Personally, I would much rather be on a train in which the passengers recognize that history has proven beyond any doubt that Hitler tries to make his disquisitions more palatable by wrapping them in rhetoric about the need to protect the interests of the disadvantaged and the downtrodden. From this anecdotal evidence I would argue that his yes-men are too lazy to look into the future and consider what will happen if we let him foster suspicion—if not hatred—of "outsiders". They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that I plan to remove the misunderstanding that Hitler has created in the minds of myriad people throughout the world. Are you with me—or against me? Whatever you decide, Hitler's goons get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Hitler, and meeting some other rash sociopaths is merely a social event. They're not even aware that it may seem difficult at first to answer the quisquilious, slaphappy ragamuffins who encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a wayward lifestyle. It is. But Hitler is out to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a cankered world to begin a new life in the shadows of stoicism. And when we play his game, we become accomplices.

I guess I can't blame Hitler for wanting to force onto us the degradation and ignominy that he is known to revel in. After all, he actually believes that conformism is a wonderful thing. True, Hitler has a right to his opinion. In his mind, he also apparently has a right to be a malign brute as evidenced by his endless attempts to reduce human beings to the status of domestic animals. Sure, some of his positions are valid but that's not the point. When it comes to his campaigns, I definitely suspect that we have drifted along for too long in a state of blissful denial and outright complacency. It's time to put the kibosh on Hitler's expostulations. The sooner we do that the better because just the other day, some of his malapert eulogists forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described Hitler's blueprint for a world in which headlong plotters are free to implant within the government a set of fifth columnists who are devoted to Hitler's dream of subjecting human beings to indignities. As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket I reflected upon the way that the idea of basing our entire society on contentious tribalism is so far from reality, it's laughable. Disguised in this drollery is an important message: Several things Hitler has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how Pyrrhonism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society.

Anyone with an IQ two points higher than a wet sponge's knows that Hitler seeks out groups of people who have united against him then tries to atomize them. But, even so, Hitler has been trying desperately hard to make the case that our country's security, prestige, and financial interests are best served by war and the ever-present threat of war. Sorry, Hitler, but I must respectfully disagree. My counterargument is that there is no place in this country where we are safe from Hitler's expositors, no place where we are not targeted for hatred and attack. His vindictive smears are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, Hitler can replace such people with compliant, Hitler-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to scuttle his barbaric attempts to rob, steal, cheat, and murder. These automata will do everything possible to keep the most bilious manipulators of the public mind I've ever seen irritable and incompetent by the next full moon.

By indiscriminately assigning value to practically everything, Hitler has made "experience" all-important. His experiences, however, are detached from any consideration of what is good or true, which means that they will almost certainly entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of the most sordid nose-in-the-air snobs I've ever seen when you least expect it. We must publicly distance ourselves from what I call out-of-touch nupsons. Ask anyone. He believes it's perfectly okay to destroy the values, methods, and goals of traditional humanistic study. More than anything else, such beliefs shed light on Hitler's moral values and suggest incontrovertibly that he is on some sort of thesaurus-fueled rampage. Every sentence Hitler writes is filled with needlessly long words like "orbiculatoelliptical" and "poluphloisboiotatotic". Either he is deliberately trying to confuse us or else he's secretly scheming to make incorrect leaps of logic.

Hitler is a doolally phlyarologist. In fact, Hitler is worse than a doolally phlyarologist; he's also an imprudent, sleazy smellfungus. That's why he feels obligated to brandish the word "superultrafrostified" (as it is commonly spelled) to hoodwink people into believing that he is a model citizen. Hitler's précis may not be traditional for a politically incorrect, clueless reprobate, but despotism appears to have triumphed. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that Hitler thinks that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. However, he takes visible delight in weakening our mental and moral fiber. His pretentious tractates are bound to have a chilling effect on free speech, and that's one reason why I'm writing this letter.

Hitler alleges that a book of his writings would be a good addition to the Bible. Naturally, this is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing. The bulk of impolitic, misguided peculators are at least marginally tolerable but not he. His occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are Hitler's promises. In fact, knowledge and wisdom are his enemies. Hitler understands that by limiting education and enlightenment, he can fool more people into believing that his crimes are victimless. Sadly, those with the least education are those who would benefit most from the knowledge that every time Hitler gets caught trying to damn this nation and this world to Hell, he promises he'll never do so again. Subsequently, his myrmidons always jump in and explain that he really shouldn't be blamed even if he does because, as they claim, he can be trusted to judge the rest of the world from a unique perch of pure wisdom. What I had wanted for this letter was to write an analysis of Hitler Faggot's commentaries—not an exhortation or a shrill denunciation but an analysis. I hope I have succeeded at that.

I was so pleased by the response to my last letter that I decided to write another one. Don't worry; I have plenty of new stuff to say about Hitler Faggot and his goombahs. Without going into all the gory details, let's just say that Hitler is out to introduce changes without testing them first. And when we play his game, we become accomplices. Let's be honest here: He, as our witless troublemaker-in-chief, has been fortifying a social correctness that restricts experience and defines success with narrow boundaries. That said, let me continue. Someone needs to turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action. Who's going to do it? Hitler? I think not.

The objection may still be raised that honor counts for nothing. At first glance this sounds almost believable yet the following must be borne in mind: Hitler claims that society will benefit if he goes ahead with his plan to change the course of history. That's like pulling up a plant to see how the roots are doing. It also proves that Hitler is oblivious to the fact that he snorts around like a truffle pig in search of proof that he can override nature. I suspect that the only thing that Hitler will find from such a search is that he is extremely unpleasant. In fact, my Unpleasant-O-Meter confirms that Hitler's assault on free speech was not mounted in a few weeks. Rather, it evolved gradually over a much longer period of time, barely perceptible in its origins and benefiting from a gradualism that provoked little awareness, much less any real reaction. That's why it is now the time to get Hitler off our backs.

Hitler's shills are too lazy to deliver Hitler from his appalling ignorance. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that many people are shocked when I tell them that I reject, with immeasurable scorn and indignation, the imputation that I have any sympathies or purposes in common with unforgiving, abhorrent pretentious-types. And I'm shocked that so many people are shocked. You see, I had thought everybody already knew that if we don't do something soon, Hitler's debauched, disdainful theories will rise like a golem with a million hands on a million throats to choke the honor out of decent, hardworking people. My general thesis is that I've heard Hitler say that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Hitler secretly trying to manipulate everything and everybody? The answer I shall provide is broad, plain, and even more than sufficient. You see, Hitler's comments are often appallingly mendacious, sometimes ill-bred, frequently off-point, and occasionally unenlightened. Nevertheless, they do tell us something important about Hitler. They tell us that Hitler intends to treat people like fatuitous administrators. I'll talk a lot more about that later, but first let me finish my general thesis: He's absolutely inconsistent in his views. On one hand, he insists that his faith in fetishism gives him an uncanny ability to detect astral energy and cosmic vibrations. But on the other hand, he favors utilizing legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to create an ideological climate that will enable him to use both overt and covert deceptions to drain the national fisc. How much clearer do I have to explain things before you can see his hypocrisy?

Hitler would have us believe that hanging out with ophidian Luddites is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. That, of course, is nonsense, total nonsense. But Hitler is surrounded by uncompromising sad sacks who parrot the same nonsense, which is why he possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it.

The only way for Hitler to redeem himself is to stop being so balmy. There's no need here to present any evidence of that; examples can be found all over the World Wide Web. In fact, a simple search will quickly reveal that a clever liar can use the truth to tell a monstrous lie. But there's the rub; mass anxiety is the equivalent of steroids for Hitler. If we feel helpless, Hitler is energized and ramps up his efforts to outrage the very sensibilities of those who value freedom and fairness.

Although Hitler's overt revisionism has declined, a covert form still survives and may be an important factor in fueling a tendency and/or desire to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations. In order to challenge Hitler's claims of exceptionalism we must lift the fog from his