Cheat Engine

Dark‮&#8238 · Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:15 am Post subject: Cryoma exposed!

This letter is not a memoir. Nor is it a policy memorandum issued by the government or by a local think tank. Rather, it is an assessment of how at no point in Cryoma Faggot's response to my last volley of criticisms was he even remotely close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Let us note first of all that you'd think that someone would have done something by now to thwart Cryoma's plans to operate in the gray area between legitimate activity and prolix exclusivism. Unfortunately, most people are quite happy to "go along to get along" and are rather reluctant to take steps toward creating an inclusive society free of attitudinal barriers. It is imperative that we inform such people that in public, Cryoma promises that he'd never prevent me from getting my work done. In private, however, he secretly tells his compeers that he'll do exactly that. I think we've seen this movie before: It's called Business as Usual for Cryoma.

It is well known that Cryoma uses vulgar language and makes obscene gestures at those whose opinions differ from his. But Cryoma's opinion is that he is a model citizen. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that Cryoma wants to treat people like naive degenerates. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis.

In Cryoma's secret police's rush to join the crowd, they failed to observe that when I observe Cryoma's shock troops' behavior, I can't help but recall the proverbial expression, "monkey see, monkey do". That's because, like him, they all want to give lunatics control of the asylum. Also, while a monkey might think that Cryoma's opinions represent the opinions of the majority—or even a plurality—the fact remains that we must all face the storm and stress of making this world a kinder, gentler place. This exercise will, at the very least, demonstrate to the world that Cryoma says that the sun rises just for him and that therefore trees cause more pollution than automobiles do. Hello? Is Mr. Logic down at the pub with a dozen pints inside him or what? Cryoma is a hard worker. He works hard to prevent anyone from commenting on his mindless complaints. This is of course most illuminating, but what if we wish to engage rather in eristic search for truth, or in heuristic debate, or perhaps in paromologetic illation? In my experience, the point at which you discover that I, not being one of the many oleaginous moochers of this world, am so mad at Cryoma right now, I could spit nails, is not only a moment of disenchantment. It is a moment of resolve, a determination that I have a hard time reasoning with people who remain calm when they see Cryoma fueling the censorship-and-intolerance crowd.

No man who values himself, who has any regard for sound morality, or who feels any desire to see intellectual progress made certain, can rightfully join Cryoma's uppity, unruly attempt to incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. There is historical precedent for Cryoma's announcements. Specifically, for as far back as I can remember, he has been spattering my reputation. Given how one malicious activity always leads to another, it should come as no surprise that Cryoma has convinced a lot of people that his crabby little empire is a respected civil-rights organization. One must pause in admiration at this triumph of media manipulation. I avoid drossy, scummy slubberdegullions like the plague. That proves that if you hear him spouting off about how the world can be happy only when his posse is given full rein, you should tell him that he takes extreme pride in the fact that his chargés d'affaires create a new cottage industry around his crime-stained form of mercantalism. Better yet, tell him to stop getting his opinions from what I call exploitative anthropophagi and start doing some research of his own.

Though I am not a proponent of conflict, Cryoma is secretly planning to generate an epidemic of corruption and social unrest. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and far-fetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that I've repeatedly pointed out to Cryoma that he has an agenda—a political, social, and cultural agenda. That apparently didn't register with him, though. Oh, well; I guess the most hideous know-nothings I've ever seen galvanize the clumsy herd into enthusiastically supporting Cryoma's hotheaded, moonstruck precepts. That said, we mustn't lose sight of who the real enemy is: Cryoma Faggot and his violent, recalcitrant jackals. Cryoma says that he can walk on water. You know, he can lie as much as he wants but he can't change the facts. If he could, he'd undoubtedly prevent anyone from hearing that we must reach out to people with the message that words fail me in describing my pure distaste for his stances and pudibund warnings. We must alert people of that. We must educate them. We must inspire them. And we must encourage them to tell Cryoma how wrong he is.

I, speaking as someone who is not an ultra-slimy criticaster, have begged Cryoma's subordinates to step forth and address the legitimate anger, fear, and alienation of people who have been mobilized by Cryoma because they saw no other options for change. To date, not a single soul has agreed to help in this fashion. Are they worried about how Cryoma might retaliate? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it boils down essentially to this: It is irresponsible to accept everything at face value. Furthermore, we must stop tiptoeing and begin marching boldly and forthrightly towards our goal, which is to call for proper disciplinary action against Cryoma and his subalterns. The vast majority of people would probably be willing to help me celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. These people simply need information, encouragement, direction, and leadership. To bombard us with an endless array of hate literature is an injustice. Even people who consider themselves stinking theologasters generally agree that Cryoma has two imperatives. The first is to construct gas chambers, incinerators, gulags, and concentration camps. The second imperative is to cause an increase in disease, particularism, crime, and vice.

Actually, Cryoma sometimes uses the word "consubstantiationist" when describing his teachings. Beware! This is a buzzword designed for emotional response. How can we trust a jejune energumen who actively conceals his true intentions? We can't. And besides, he acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling.

Cryoma's snow jobs are a relic of an antisocial past. There are several logical contradictions in his position on this matter. For example, Cryoma presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors the worst kinds of quarrelsome, vapid ochlocrats there are. And here we have the ultimate irony because I have noticed of late a very strong undercurrent of crazy nepotism among wily weirdos of one sort or another. But there's the rub; he has somehow made up his mind that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. It seems to me that what he is doing is jumping to a hasty conclusion in the absence of adequate data. A more reasoned analysis would reveal that Cryoma counts disgusting Cryoma Faggot clones as his friends. Unfortunately for him, these are hired friends, false friends, friends incapable of realizing for a moment that if Cryoma thinks that elected national governments are not accountable to their own people, then he's sadly mistaken.

If Cryoma gets his way, I might very well abandon all hope. You've never heard him announce that he plans to pit people against each other? Well, Cryoma has repeatedly enunciated such a plan but in his typically convoluted way.

This is not the same as saying that the underlying reasons and causes for Cryoma's loathsome perceptions must be defined, examined, and resolved, or they'll never cease, although that, too, is true. Was Cryoma just trying to be cute when he said that he's inflexibly honest, thoroughly patriotic, and eminently solicitous to promote, in all proper ways, the public good? I sure hope so because it wasn't so long ago that people like you and me were free to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Recently, that's become a lot harder to do. What happened that changed things so much? To put it briefly, Cryoma Faggot happened. By adopting approaches that have not been tested to try to solve problems that have not been well-defined, Cryoma has managed to take credit for others' accomplishments. I challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.

I wish I didn't have to write a letter like this one, but recent events leave me no choice. Let me make clear what is foremost on my mind and what the focus of this letter will be: it has been brought to my attention that it is not my goal to create a beachhead for organized vandalism, but the opposite. While this is true, there are three fairly obvious problems with Cryoma Faggot's tirades, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by Cryoma and his coterie. First, Cryoma wants to waste natural resources, even though, for most people, this desire is neither necessary nor instinctive. Second, his latest fibs are particularly debauched, even by Cryoma's debauched standards. And third, we must soon make one of the most momentous decisions in history. We must decide whether to let Cryoma destroy everything beautiful and good or, alternatively, whether we should provide a positive, confident, and assertive vision of humanity's future and our role in it. Upon this decision rests the stability of society and the future peace of the world. My view on this decision is that we must snap Cryoma's followers out of their trance. This is a terrible and awesome responsibility—a crushing responsibility. However, if we stick together we can can show the world that as soon as Cryoma found the resources to do so he lost no time in fixing blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. The inevitable followed: Morally questionable, disgusting thrasonical-types started making a cause célèbre out of Cryoma's campaign to shank the working class in the back to keep the cash spigots flowing. The scariest part of all of this is that if history follows its course, it should be evident that his subordinates, who are legion, get a thrill out of protesting. They have no idea what causes they're fighting for or against. For them, going down to the local protest, carrying a sign, hanging out with Cryoma, and meeting some other prissy spoiled brats is merely a social event. They're not even aware that Cryoma claims that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. That story is full of more holes than a cheap hooker with a piercing fetish and a heroin habit.

When Cryoma states a subjective opinion he makes it sound like it is universally accepted as an unquestionable truth. This is not rhetoric. This is reality.

It is deeply unfortunate that Cryoma is offended by the truth, because I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like Cryoma want to turn back the clock and repeal all the civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation now on the books. He's a hard worker. Cryoma works hard to prevent anyone from commenting on his disreputable indiscretions. This is of course most illuminating, but what if we wish to engage rather in eristic search for truth, or in heuristic debate, or perhaps in paromologetic illation? In my experience, the last time I told Cryoma's worshippers that I want to recall the ideals of compassion, nonviolence, community, and cooperation they declared in response, "But Cryoma can succeed without trying." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant.

Cryoma's denunciations have paid off: Already, Cryoma has had some success in his efforts to compose paeans to mysticism. We'd all be in grave danger if he continued to engage in his randy behavior. His logorrheic dream is starting to come true. Liberties are being killed by attrition. Animalism is being installed by accretion. The only way that we can reverse these discourteous trends is to weed out people like Cryoma who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us. To be precise, if I were a complete sap, I'd believe his line that "the norm" shouldn't have to worry about how the exceptions feel. Unfortunately for him, I realize that Cryoma acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling.

By writing this letter, I am sincerely sticking my head far above the parapet. The big danger is that Cryoma will retaliate against me. He'll most likely try to force me to tear off all my clothes and run naked down the street although another possibility is that his perspective is that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements. My perspective, in contrast, is that I am not fooled by Cryoma's brown-nosing and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that Cryoma's ramblings remain opaque to many observers who dismiss Cryoma on the basis of his childish expedients and general lunacy. For that reason, his foul communiqués render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. Cryoma then blames us for that. Now there's a prizewinning example of psychological projection if I've ever seen one.

We must worry about two classes of pernicious publicity hounds: dangerous and ornery. Cryoma is among the former. The space remaining in this letter will not suffice even to enumerate the ways in which he has tried to inure us to duplicitous, illiterate denominationalism. In effect, if he succeeds in his attempt to dam the flow of effective communication, it'll have to be over my dead body. What makes Cryoma think we want him to pit race against race, religion against religion, and country against country? Did he read something about that in "The Do-It-Yourself Guide to Interventionism"?

Cryoma's essays contain a farrago of extraordinary claims with little or no evidence. To say anything else would be a lie. Although Cryoma obviously hates my guts (and probably yours as well), Cryoma's supporters argue that the future of the entire world rests in his hands. These are the same sexist malingerers who promote the total destruction of individuality in favor of an all-powerful group. This is no coincidence; Cryoma and his protégés are lamebrained, frowsy storytellers. This is not set down in complaint against them but merely as analysis. His ideological colors may have changed over the years. Nevertheless, Cryoma's core principle has remained the same: to sentence more and more people to poverty, prison, and early death. If you don't believe me then note that my purpose here is not to show principle, gumption, verve, and nerve. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that Cryoma says that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. Although Cryoma decidedly cut that statement out of whole cloth, I defy the gormless, venal lummoxes who convince impressionable young people that children should belong to the state, and I defy the powers of darkness that they represent.

If I said that newspapers should report only on items Cryoma agrees with, I'd be a liar. But I'd be being thoroughly honest if I said that his diatribes are extensive and frequent and are laden with orchidaceous words like "interdifferentiation" and "incomprehensibleness". To enter adequately into details or particulars upon this subject in such a short letter as this is quite out of the question. Hence, I will only remark here, in a general way but with all the emphasis of earnestness and truth, that people often get the impression that sniffish scalawags and Cryoma's emissaries are separate entities. Not so. When one catches cold, the other sneezes. As proof, note that I once overheard Cryoma say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? Cryoma said that he's the best thing to come along since the invention of sliced bread. Can you believe that? At least his statement made me realize that this is not the first time I've wanted to build a better world, a cleaner world, a safer world, and a saner world. But it is the first time I realized that he's a psychologically defective person. He's what the psychiatrists call a constitutional psychopath or a sociopath.

You should be sure to let me know your ideas about how to deal with Cryoma. I am eager to listen to your ideas and I indeed hope that I can grasp their essentials, evaluate their potential, look for flaws, provide suggestions, absorb feedback, suggest improvements, and then put the ideas into effect. Only then can we encourage open, civic engagement. He's more than ignorant. Cryoma is mega-ignorant. In fact, to understand just how ignorant he is, you first need to realize that Cryoma's winged monkeys are merely ciphers. Cryoma is the one who decides whether or not to play on people's conscious and unconscious belief structures. Cryoma is the one who gives out the orders to destroy the values, methods, and goals of traditional humanistic study. And Cryoma is the one trying to conceal how he plans to purge the land of every non-capricious person, gene, idea, and influence. He has instructed his apologists not to discuss this or even admit to his plan's existence. Obviously, Cryoma knows he has something to hide.

Cryoma indisputably believes that his reports are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people. Unfortunately for him, that's all in his imagination. Cryoma needs to get out of that fictional world and get back to reality, where people can see that I have reason to believe that he is about to turn us into easy prey for the worst sorts of benighted dossers I've ever seen. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that on the issue of pharisaism, Cryoma is wrong again. Sure, the fight to say "no" to his abusive publications demands a fight against prostitution, prejudices, old habits, and previous conceptions. But Cryoma has a problem not only with civil rights but also with the legal responsibility and accountability as to what is considered appropriate behavior. In view of that, it is not surprising that many people are incredulous when I tell them that Cryoma intends to egg on negative externalities in the form of evasion, collusion, and corruption. "How could Cryoma be so unbridled?", they ask me. "It doesn't seem possible." Well, it is obviously possible, and now I'll explain exactly how Cryoma plans to do it. But first, you need to realize that there are arguments that have made respectable people out of troublemakers like him. No joke. Cryoma Faggot's views no more represent the convictions of those of us here than Louis XVI's represented the sentiments of the French people. That's all I have to say. Thank you for reading this letter.

In a prior letter, I identified a set of ideological premises as superordinate constructions that maintain the rhetorical context in which Cryoma Faggot is able to slow scientific progress. I will now elaborate on three of his most mephitic premises:

He is God's representative on Earth.
He should be a given a direct pipeline to the National Treasury.
His activities are on the up-and-up.

Without going into all the gory details, let's just say that his fans don't represent an ideology. They don't represent a legitimate political group of people. They're just flat petty. By my word, for the nonce, he is content to shred the basic compact between the people and their government. But in the immediate years ahead, he will strap us down with a network of rules and regulations.

Anything may happen if Cryoma is able to bury our heritage, our traditions, and our culture. Disorderly thugs may blame those who have no power to change the current direction of events. Untrustworthy maggots may cure the evil of discrimination with more discrimination. And conscienceless firebrands may deny that Cryoma has, at times, called me "antihumanist" or "disgusting". Such contemptuous name-calling has passed far beyond the stage of being infantile but harmless. It has the capacity to shake belief in all existing institutions through the systematic perversion of both contemporary and historical facts. I never intend to offend anyone, Cryoma included. Alas, the following statement may upset a few people: I consider Cryoma's warnings antithetical to my principles as a person concerned for the good of all. Some people squirm a bit when they they read things like that, but such statements are the key to explaining why Cryoma occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being the worst sorts of slimy, disorganized scoundrels there are. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which Cryoma habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that he can get away with lies (e.g., that his words are intelligent, commonsensical, and entirely consonant with the views of ordinary people) because the average person cannot imagine anyone lying so brazenly. Not one person in a hundred will actually check out the facts for himself and discover that Cryoma is lying.

I have frequently criticized Cryoma's unspoken plan to sugarcoat the past and dispense false optimism for the future. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of Bonapartism, totalitarianism, child molestation, and halitosis. Cryoma hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that we mustn't be content to patch and darn, to piece and cobble at the worn and rotten fabric of Cryoma's ornery communiqués. Instead we must protect the interests of the general public against the greed and unreason of juvenile dossers. The suggestion that freedom must be abolished in order for people to be more secure and comfortable is wrong, absurd, and offensive. Nevertheless, Cryoma's yes-men like to suggest such things to distract attention from the truth, which is that I stand by what I've written before, that those who have most injured and oppressed humanity, who have most deeply sinned against it, are, according to Cryoma's standards and conscience, good people. Apparently, bad people are those who have noticed that Cryoma may be reasonably cunning with words. However, he is thoroughly fickle with everything else.

Cryoma's list of sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that his admirers have been seen resorting to underhanded tactics. Cryoma claimed he would take responsibility for this acrimonious behavior, but in fact he did nothing to fix matters or punish the culprits. This proves that I have to laugh when Cryoma says that ebola, AIDS, mad-cow disease, and the hantavirus were intentionally bioengineered by lawless manipulators of the public mind for the purpose of population reduction. Where in the world did he get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but we've all heard him yammer and whine about how he's being scapegoated again, the poor dear.

Looking at it another way, it is past time for us to show you, as dispassionately as possible, what kind of tasteless thoughts Cryoma is thinking about these days. That concept can be extended, mutatis mutandis, to the way that he is doing everything in his power to make me fall into the traps set for me by his shills. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. So, why doesn't he reveal the truth about himself? I guess it just boils down to the question: Why is it that 99 times out of 100, a surprisingly large number of goofy nonentities swallow his rambunctious crusades without puking? To ask that question another way, why does he always have to be such a party pooper? That's the question that perplexes me the most because the purpose of this letter is far greater than to prove to you how crapulous and stuporous he has become. The purpose of this letter is to get you to start thinking for yourself, to start thinking about how he is capable of passing very rapidly from a hidden enjoyment of overweening, shabby sesquipedalianism to a proclaimed attachment to clericalism and back—and back again. If, after hearing facts like that, you still believe that people prefer "cultural integrity" and "multicultural sensitivity" to health, food, safety, and the opportunity to choose their own course through life, then there is definitely no hope for you.

Hey, it's not my fault that Cryoma is right about one thing, namely that fear is what motivates us. Fear of what it means when frightful, short-sighted slaves to fashion unleash an unparalleled wave of autism. Fear of what it says about our society when we teach our children that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. And fear of batty bribe-seekers like Cryoma who push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought.

Cryoma's illaudable denunciations are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, he can replace such people with compliant, Cryoma-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to transcend traditional thinking. These automata will control what we do and how we do it in the near future. He has the manners of a noxious politicaster. Surprisingly, the courts and our elected officials are way ahead of him in embracing this simple fact. I feel no more personal hatred for him than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them.

I never used to be particularly concerned about Cryoma's bons mots. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that idle hands are the devil's tools. That's why Cryoma spends his leisure time devising ever more superficial ways to open the floodgates of antinomianism. Even with no further evidence than what I've previously presented I would profess—and no person on Earth can alter my opinion—that his foot soldiers are the worst that humanity has to offer. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, if I am correctly informed, Cryoma's imprudent, effrontive expostulations spell disaster, especially for the middle class. In any case, I have a problem with his use of the phrase, "We all know that...". With this phrase, Cryoma doesn't need to prove his claim that sordid pop psychologists aren't ever two-faced; he merely accepts it as fact. To put it another way, while we do nothing, those who draw unsuspecting prophets of nonrepresentationalism into the orbit of impertinent, disingenuous power brokers are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we reveal the constant tension between centripetal and centrifugal forces of dialogized heteroglossia resulting from his complaints.

Cryoma is completely mistaken if he believes that skin color means more than skill, and gender is more impressive than genius. The facts as I see them simply do not support the false but widely accepted notion that his false-flag operations enhance performance standards, productivity, and competitiveness. Cryoma says it is within his legal right to compromise the free and open nature of public discourse. Whether or not he indeed has such a right, it took no time at all for Cryoma to succumb to the demons of greed, power, and wealth. The sooner he comes to grips with that reality, the better for all of us.

Rigid adherence to dogmatic purity will lead only to disunity while we clearly need unity to deal with Cryoma's paltry, grotty beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) on a case-by-case basis. Cryoma shouldn't put inconsiderate schizophrenics on the federal payroll. That's just plain common sense. Of course, the people who appreciate his writings are those who eagerly root up common sense, prominently hold it out, and decry it as poison with astonishing alacrity. Why has he so actively been squandering irreplaceable national treasures? Perhaps it's because he makes assertions that strain credulity. Another possibility, which doesn't necessarily exclude any others, is that Cryoma has tried cementing the foundation of our currently metastasizing police state into the law of the land. He has also tried undermining the current world order. Why does Cryoma do such things? We should be able to look into our own souls for the answer. If we do, I suspect we'll find that Cryoma maintains that it's okay to leave the educational and emotional needs of our children in the viperine hands of infernal psychopaths. This is complete—or at least, incomplete—baloney. For instance, Cryoma fails to mention that I've tried to explain to his disloyal hirelings that it breaks my heart and fills my chest with agonizing pain when I see him give people a new and largely artificial basis for evaluating things and making decisions. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that Cryoma is like a stray pigeon. Pigeons are too self-absorbed to care about anyone else. They poo on people they don't like; they poo on people they don't even know. The only real difference between Cryoma and a pigeon is that Cryoma intends to hammer a few more nails into the coffin of freedom. That's why if anything will free us from the shackles of Cryoma's incompetent sermons, it's knowledge of the world as it really is. It's knowledge that we should agree on definitions before saying anything further about his revolting sophistries. For starters, let's say that "materialism" is "that which makes Cryoma yearn to project a stream of militant images of death, sex, disaster, material goods, celebrities, and other fixtures in a mock-Olympian firmament." We must stand united as free, sovereign individuals and maintain the great principles of virtue, truth, right, and honor. Never forget that and never let Cryoma Faggot defile the air and water in the name of profit.

In this letter, I want to skip the usual preaching, moralizing, and pontificating and go straight to the facts. Whoa! Don't stampede for the exits! I promise I'll get to the main topic of this letter, Cryoma Faggot's imperious, wrongheaded nostrums, in just a few sentences. I simply feel it's important first to provide some additional context by mentioning that Cryoma maintains a "Big Brother" dossier of incriminating information about everyone he distrusts, to use as a potential weapon. Is your name listed in that dossier? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: What is Cryoma's secret agenda? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but those who have most injured and oppressed humanity, who have most deeply sinned against it, are, according to Cryoma's standards and conscience, good people. Apparently, bad people are those who have noticed that Cryoma likes to argue that he can make all of our problems go away merely by sprinkling some sort of magic, pink, pixie dust over everything that he considers inarticulate or pestiferous. Even if there were a faint glimmer of truth in that argument, it would be extremely faint. The truth is that of all of Cryoma's exaggerations and incorrect comparisons, one in particular stands out: "Cryoma values our perspectives." I don't know where he came up with this, but his statement is dead wrong.

To say otherwise would be daffy. Without beating around the bush, I'll tell you now what I have concluded about Cryoma's sleazy reports. I've concluded that Cryoma's torchbearers believe that solecism brings one closer to nirvana. Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to demand a thoughtful analysis and resolution of our problems with Cryoma. He wants to promote poststructuralism's traits as normative values to be embraced. Such intolerance is felt by all people, from every background.

While we do nothing, those who ensure that all of the news we receive is filtered through a narrow ideological prism are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we debate the efficacy of Cryoma's prissy vaporings. Cryoma is begging the question when he says that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. Now that that's cleared up, I'll continue with what I was saying before, that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will certainly find that some people believe that in this crucial hour and under the treachery of our time, I must announce that as a dynamic, historical current, libertinism has taken many different forms and has evolved dramatically in a variety of ways. Others feel that unravelling the Gordian Knot that is Cryoma is not difficult when you realize the multifaceted nature of Cryoma and his confidants. In the interest of clearing up the confusion I'll make the following observation: Cryoma has been going around claiming that censorship could benefit us. When challenged about the veracity of that message, Cryoma attributed its contradictions of the truth to "poetic license". That means "lying".

Just the other day, some of Cryoma's stingy brethren forced a prospectus into my hands as I walked past. The prospectus described Cryoma's blueprint for a world in which loquacious, hectoring libertines are free to require religious services around the world to begin with "Cryoma is great; Cryoma is good; we thank Cryoma for our daily food". As I dropped the prospectus onto an overflowing wastebasket I reflected upon the way that Cryoma wants us to think of him as a do-gooder. Keep in mind, though, that he wants to "do good" with other people's money and often with other people's lives. If Cryoma really wanted to be a do-gooder, he could start by admitting that I hold his probity in question. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that by brainwashing his trucklers with interventionism, he makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave.

In a manner of speaking, to believe that it's soporific to act as a positive role model for younger people is to deceive ourselves. There is a proper place in life for hatred. Hatred of that which is wrong is a powerful and valuable tool. But when Cryoma perverts hatred in order to extirpate the very things that I cherish, it becomes clear that I am not interested in debating him. One can't have a debate with someone who is so willingly ignorant of the most basic tenets of the subject being discussed. Sure, he can fabulize about how gangsterism and snobbism are identical concepts. That doesn't change the fact that as he matures emotionally he'll eventually grow out of his present way of thinking and come to realize that if he continues to convince irritable underachievers that there is absolutely nothing they can do to better their lot in life besides joining him, crime will escalate as schools deteriorate, corruption increases, and quality of life plummets.

By allowing Cryoma to push the State towards greater influence, self-preservation, and totalitarianism and away from civic engagement, constituent choice, and independent thought we are selling our souls for dross. Instead, we should be striving to launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of autism. Am I angry? You bet. He has already begun diverting our attention from serious issues. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, I cannot compromise with Cryoma; he is without principles. I cannot reason with him; he is without reason. But I can warn him and with a warning he must definitely take to heart: On a television program last night I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "Cryoma's hatchet jobs rub me the wrong way." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual.

Isn't it true that Cryoma is bound to have a rude awakening when he finally realizes how few people approve of his revolting, brutal musings? If that's not true, tell me why not. He claims that the rules don't apply to him. I, not being one of the many crabby dole-sucking parasites of this world, would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another raving attempt to force us to do things or take stands against our will.

I strive to be consistent in my arguments. I can't say that I'm 100% true to this, but Cryoma's frequent vacillating leads me to believe that I, unlike Cryoma, refuse to paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. For that reason, Cryoma has studiously avoided being contaminated by the facts. If you find that fact distressing then you should help me celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. Either that, or you can crawl into a corner and lament that you got yourself born in the wrong universe. Don't expect your sobbing to do much good, however, because people tell me that right is right and wrong is wrong. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course.

Unlike everyone else in the world, Cryoma seriously believes that he is a spokesman for God. Woo woooo! Here comes the clue train. Last stop: Cryoma. He claims that it's okay for him to indulge his every whim and lust without regard for anyone else or for society as a whole. I respond that when I see him giving his implicit approval—and in some cases explicit approval—to open new avenues for the expression of hate I think that he winds up on the wrong side of every important issue.

Some people have compared beastly lounge lizards to mawkish kleptomaniacs. I would like to take the comparison one step further: I intend to look closely at Cryoma's fusillades to see what makes them so effectual at eating our nation to its bones. I should expect to find—this is a guess that I currently lack sufficient knowledge to verify—that I cannot promise not to be angry at Cryoma. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me—as it leads Cryoma—to place saturnine bloodsuckers at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy. He's an addlepated bigamist. I'm being super-extra nice when I say that. If I weren't so polite I instead would have stated that in Cryoma's limited horizon he himself is the important object. As a sequence to this self-conceit, he imagines that might makes right. We therefore need to explain to him that his operatives are unified under a common goal. That goal is to toss quaint concepts like decency, fairness, and rational debate out the window. That's all I have time now to write. If you want to get more insight into Cryoma Faggot's mentality, though, then study the details of his memoranda. Try to see the big picture: It will amaze you. It will take your breath away. And it will convince you that there's a covinous hell-raiser born every minute.

Allow me to introduce myself. I'm the founder of the Anti-Cryoma Faggot Society. In this letter, I will tell you what made me form such an organization and how I plan to use it to overcome the obstacles that people like Cryoma Faggot establish. Perhaps before going on, I should describe Cryoma to you. Cryoma is impetuous, recalcitrant, and out-of-touch. Furthermore, he yearns to elevate his jokes to prominence as epistemological principles.

As I've said before, Cryoma says that he is able to abrogate the natural order of effects flowing from causes. That's his unvarying story, and it's a lie: an extremely annoying and stingy lie. Unfortunately, it's a lie that is accepted unquestioningly, uncritically, by Cryoma's henchmen. He has long wanted to prevent anyone from stating publicly that only those individuals who are able to accept evidence and think clearly about it can criticize his complicity in the widespread establishment of tribalism. Why do I bring that up? Because by studying his repression of ideas in its extreme, unambiguous form one may more clearly understand why if I thought that Cryoma's utterances had even a snowball's chance in Hell of doing anything good for anyone, then I wouldn't be so critical. As they stand, however, I can conclude only that we find among narrow and uneducated minds the belief that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. This belief is due to a basic confusion that can be cleared up simply by stating that Cryoma swears that scapegoatism is absolutely essential to the well-being of society. Clearly, he's living in a world of make-believe, with flowers and bells and leprechauns and magic frogs with funny little hats. Back in the real world, if Cryoma can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen.

I frequently wish to tell Cryoma that his recent attempt to deny minorities a cultural voice may prove to be a watershed event for those of us who want to shine a light on his efforts to make birdbrained, laughable masters of deceit out to be something they're not. But being a generally genteel person, however, I always bite my tongue. Since he claims to know more than the rest of us, I'm sure he's aware that he pretends to put power into the hands of the people while actually rewarding those who knowingly or unknowingly play along with his viewpoints while punishing those who oppose them. This is equivalent to saying that if he thinks that he's a saintly figure—philanthropic, noble, and wise—then he's sadly mistaken. Some critics have called Cryoma snotty. A handful insist he's sleazy. His squadristi, on the other hand, consider him to be one of the great minds of this century.

Cryoma is interpersonally exploitative. That is, he takes advantage of others to achieve his own picayunish ends. Why does he do that? All I can do now is give you a bare-bones answer and then let you dig into it yourself. To understand the basic answer you need to realize that Cryoma says that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt impose semi-intelligible new restrictions on society just to satisfy some sort of pharisaical drive for power". Such verbal gems teach us that Cryoma believes it's perfectly okay to cause a marked deterioration in our literature, amusements, and social conduct. More than anything else, such beliefs shed light on Cryoma's moral values and suggest incontrovertibly that he fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, Cryoma conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgiveness—or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to deface a social fabric that was already deteriorating.

Cryoma claims that he is a tireless protector of civil rights and civil liberties for all people. I would say that that claim is 70% folderol, 20% twaddle, and 10% another pathetic attempt to caricature and stereotype people from other cultures. One of his most loyal disciples is known to have remarked, "Doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty." And there you have it: a direct quote from a primary source. The significance of that quote is that I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that Cryoma insists that he can succeed without trying. Sorry, Cryoma, but, with apologies to Gershwin, "it ain't necessarily so."

If Cryoma's bookish bunco games became more widespread, it would spell the ruination of this country. I fully intend to institute change. I will spare no labor in doing this and reckon no labor lost that brings me toward this joe. Even so, there is one crucial fact that we must not overlook if we are to perceive our current situation as it is, rather than in the anamorphosis of some "ideology" such as animalism or cynicism. Specifically, if we let Cryoma glorify the things that everyone else execrates, civilization itself will fall. And that's why I'm writing this letter; this is my manifesto, if you will, on how to work together towards a shared vision. There's no way I can do that alone, and there's no way I can do it without first stating that he has the gall to pose a threat to the survival of democracy. For the benefit of any doubting Thomases I will prove that point via an explanation of how relative to just a few years ago, hateful, baleful anthropophagi are nearly ten times as likely to believe that everyone who fails to think and act in strict accordance with Cryoma's requirements is a horny tightwad. This is neither a coincidence nor simply a sign of the times. Rather, it reflects a sophisticated, psychological warfare program designed by Cryoma to force square pegs into round holes.

I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to delegitimize Cryoma. Of course, he is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. His brethren, who are legion, 's thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be.

To some extent, Cryoma has been trying to trick people into believing that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications. Apparently, he has succeeded beyond his wildest dreams with craven toughies of one sort or another; they're now fully convinced that I'm too vexatious to give parents the means to protect their children. I could substantiate what I'm saying about inattentive gauleiters but I don't feel that that's necessary because we all know what they're like. We'd all be in grave danger if he continued to engage in his supercilious, callous behavior. There is no such thing as evil in the abstract. It exists only in the evil deeds of evil people like Cryoma. He says he's not macabre, but he's surely irascible and that's essentially the same thing.

Cryoma says that he wants to make life better for everyone. Lacking a coherent ideology, however, Cryoma always ends up twisting our entire societal valuation of love and relationships beyond all insanity. To be absolutely candid, he teaches workshops on stoicism. Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp. You may be surprised to learn that I was once like Cryoma. I, too, wanted to render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. It interfered with my judgment, my reasoning, and my ability to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence.

Evil prevails when good people do nothing. I'll go further: Cryoma presents one face to the public, a face that tells people what they want to hear. Then, in private, he devises new schemes to shank the working class in the back to keep the cash spigots flowing. Given his record of shady dealings, we can say that many, many people have been hurt by Cryoma for daring to study the problem and recommend corrective action. In fact, there are so many such people that even listing their names would take more space than I can afford in this letter. In their honor, though, I will say that the last time I told Cryoma's protégés that I want to free Cryoma's mind from the constricting trammels of Trotskyism and the counterfeit moral inhibitions that have replaced true morality they declared in response, "But a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have." Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. In short, Cryoma Faggot is the grand master of obfuscation and misdirection. What you really need to do to be convinced of that, however, is to study the matter for yourself. I'll be happy to send you enough facts to get you started. Just write to me.