| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Habufe Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 149 Location: http://www.SaviourFagFails.com/
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:00 am Post subject: More web, less chrome |
|
|
Way to start a direct, head-to-head fight with Google, Microfags.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bisa How do I cheat?
Reputation: 16
Joined: 14 Aug 2007 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| And FF wins. : D
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArcaneKnite Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 1519
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
LOL
Chrome is still the best.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
PunkMilitia Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: -1
Joined: 14 Jun 2007 Posts: 1270 Location: South England.
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
More Web, Less chrome? What a crap slogan for an ad! I have to admit ie is getting MUCH better now and some browsers are falling behind fast (Firefox, possibly Opera)
I don't feel it's in direct competition with Chrome, if it was then chrome would win.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phox I post too much
Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 2034
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't get it, are they implying that Chrome doesn't have the smallest and thinnest top and bottom of any browser? The IE that they use at my school takes up like 400 pixels on top and 50 on the bottom, so the actual web viewing space is tiny. Pretty weak argument imo.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Maes Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 10
Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I don't get it. They both suck in comparison to FF.
_________________
Account reclaimed by former owner? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shitposter Newbie cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 12 Nov 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 12:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Phox wrote: | | I don't get it, are they implying that Chrome doesn't have the smallest and thinnest top and bottom of any browser? The IE that they use at my school takes up like 400 pixels on top and 50 on the bottom, so the actual web viewing space is tiny. Pretty weak argument imo. |
This isn't thin
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
(\/)_(;,,;)_(\/) Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Posts: 1610
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I got sick and tired of Chrome, sometime last month it kept crashing and all this other bullshit so I went back to FF.
@xTremist what skin is that?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ArcaneKnite Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 1519
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xTremist wrote: | | Phox wrote: | | I don't get it, are they implying that Chrome doesn't have the smallest and thinnest top and bottom of any browser? The IE that they use at my school takes up like 400 pixels on top and 50 on the bottom, so the actual web viewing space is tiny. Pretty weak argument imo. |
This isn't thin
 |
What the hell is that giant thing underneath the address bar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
(\/)_(;,,;)_(\/) Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 3
Joined: 07 Apr 2008 Posts: 1610
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ArcaneKnite wrote: | | xTremist wrote: | | Phox wrote: | | I don't get it, are they implying that Chrome doesn't have the smallest and thinnest top and bottom of any browser? The IE that they use at my school takes up like 400 pixels on top and 50 on the bottom, so the actual web viewing space is tiny. Pretty weak argument imo. |
This isn't thin
 |
What the hell is that giant thing underneath the address bar. |
Looks like a bookmarks toolbar that's empty.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
emil Expert Cheater
Reputation: 41
Joined: 06 Dec 2008 Posts: 239
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| BulletStorm wrote: | | ArcaneKnite wrote: | | xTremist wrote: | | Phox wrote: | | I don't get it, are they implying that Chrome doesn't have the smallest and thinnest top and bottom of any browser? The IE that they use at my school takes up like 400 pixels on top and 50 on the bottom, so the actual web viewing space is tiny. Pretty weak argument imo. |
This isn't thin
 |
What the hell is that giant thing underneath the address bar. |
Looks like a bookmarks toolbar that's empty. | OR MAYBE THAT HUGE BLURRY SPOT IS HIM CONCEALING HIS BOOKMARKS
NAH THAT'S CRAZY
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shitposter Newbie cheater
Reputation: 5
Joined: 12 Nov 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| That's the default skin for the Firefox beta.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Phox I post too much
Reputation: 110
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 2034
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| xTremist wrote: | | That's the default skin for the Firefox beta. |
>Internet explorer being thicker than chrome
>Firefox
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kurifodo I post too much
Reputation: 23
Joined: 09 Oct 2008 Posts: 2782
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
>implying to all of the above posters that you cant just mod most web browsers to look how you want...
and be small
Also they all pretty much do the same things.
Firefox is for people who like ad-on's like flash developers, and for people who like style and a stable browser.
Opera is for people who like style, a stable browser, speed and efficient browsing (using key strokes, opera turbo, mouse gestures and more). It is like a replica of Firefox but by a different company and made a little differently.
Chrome is a light browser that is for people who just want to go on Facebook or blog, it does not use a lot of memory to run but crashes a lot and is not as stable as the memory guzzler's Firefox and Opera.
IE is for people who have always used it, its slow and uses alot of memory. It offers almost no customization but is secure and comes with integration of OS.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Up2Admin I'm a spammer
Reputation: 126
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 6548 Location: Texas
|
Posted: Sun Jan 16, 2011 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Drakeł wrote: | >implying to all of the above posters that you cant just mod most web browsers to look how you want...
and be small
Also they all pretty much do the same things.
Firefox is for people who like ad-on's like flash developers, and for people who like style and a stable browser.
Opera is for people who like style, a stable browser, speed and efficient browsing (using key strokes, opera turbo, mouse gestures and more). It is like a replica of Firefox but by a different company and made a little differently.
Chrome is a light browser that is for people who just want to go on Facebook or blog, it does not use a lot of memory to run but crashes a lot and is not as stable as the memory guzzler's Firefox and Opera.
IE is for people who have always used it, its slow and uses alot of memory. It offers almost no customization but is secure and comes with integration of OS. | Chrome uses a lot of memory.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|