| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
iGod
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 621
Location: Manchester, uk.
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:10 pm Post subject: If your pulling something at the speed of light |
 |
|
| Would the most logical thing that it would do is stretch, since your pulling?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gogodr
I post too much
 Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iGod
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 621
Location: Manchester, uk.
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iGod
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 621
Location: Manchester, uk.
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate. |
do some research on tachyons ;3
well I'm not sure if they already confirmed them >.>...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iGod
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 621
Location: Manchester, uk.
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate. |
do some research on tachyons ;3
well I'm not sure if they already confirmed them >.>... |
So is it just theoretical, or has it been proven?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate. |
do some research on tachyons ;3
well I'm not sure if they already confirmed them >.>... |
So is it just theoretical, or has it been proven? |
theoretical at the moment I guess
but lets remember too that E=MC^2 is theoretical too
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iGod
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 621
Location: Manchester, uk.
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate. |
do some research on tachyons ;3
well I'm not sure if they already confirmed them >.>... |
So is it just theoretical, or has it been proven? |
theoretical at the moment I guess
but lets remember too that E=MC^2 is theoretical too |
So everything thats not in our physical existence (Sight, smell ect) is theoretical?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cryoma
Member of the Year
![]() Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Posts: 1819
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Anything can be viewed by the human eye, you just might not see it.
But let's say there's a particle moving at twice the speed of light.
Hypothetically, if you could as well, and you were moving alongside it, and you had microvision, you would see it.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
redslothx
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 13
Joined: 27 Nov 2006
Posts: 1949
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate. |
do some research on tachyons ;3
well I'm not sure if they already confirmed them >.>... |
So is it just theoretical, or has it been proven? |
theoretical at the moment I guess
but lets remember too that E=MC^2 is theoretical too |
So everything thats not in our physical existence (Sight, smell ect) is theoretical? |
smell is physical.
so is vision.
....
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DreadFather
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 1
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 2018
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I'm kinda confused on what your saying. What is moving at the speed of light? You? Or the object your pulling? Either way I'm pretty sure you'd get ripped to pieces.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
92Garfield
I'm a spammer
 Reputation: 57
Joined: 20 Dec 2007
Posts: 5871
Location: Banana Republic Germany
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
e=mc˛ is proven
how to "see" something is simple, we need something to shot at it that is smaller (example: electrons at protons) we can see which electrons diddnt hit the proton when they hit a sensor "wall" behind the proton, so we can say where exactly the proton is and how it's shape is
but i would have no idea how to catch something that is faster then light
maybe it would break because of it's indolence
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iGod
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 31 Jan 2009
Posts: 621
Location: Manchester, uk.
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| redslothx wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate. |
do some research on tachyons ;3
well I'm not sure if they already confirmed them >.>... |
So is it just theoretical, or has it been proven? |
theoretical at the moment I guess
but lets remember too that E=MC^2 is theoretical too |
So everything thats not in our physical existence (Sight, smell ect) is theoretical? |
smell is physical.
so is vision.
.... |
I didn't say it wasn't.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Monkeys
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 29
Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 2411
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 27, 2009 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| iGod wrote: | | redslothx wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | iGod wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | depends of the stretchability of that something.
actually there are particles that moves faster than light. |
So, they're invisible amiright? |
yes to the humans eyes yes, but there are many other ways to look things without light itself. |
Errr, elaborate. |
do some research on tachyons ;3
well I'm not sure if they already confirmed them >.>... |
So is it just theoretical, or has it been proven? |
theoretical at the moment I guess
but lets remember too that E=MC^2 is theoretical too |
So everything thats not in our physical existence (Sight, smell ect) is theoretical? |
smell is physical.
so is vision.
.... |
I didn't say it wasn't. |
You did. Or you fail at phrasing. ;p
And tachyons have been recorded I believe. But I'm not sure they're going faster than light. I know they're incredibly small and pass through everything with nearly no force affecting them, but I doubt they're faster than light.
_________________
Get a lid on that zombie,
he's never gonna be alri-i-ight.
Oooh get a lid on that zombie,
or he's gonna feed all night. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
