Cheat Engine

[compactwater]

(I am posting here because you have also recently made a large post and I am unable to login to GK)

You have addressed me in many ways meant very directly for insult and otherwise harm, you have also threatened my property's well-being, thus indirectly threatening my own family, whom is absolutely uninvolved. Did you ever think whilst making those threats of yours, that my family may in fact be unable to repair any damage? We don't own our home. We never have. The bank owns it, and anything your 'grouppe' were to do would cause a financial problem for my family. A very short-sighted thing here, but threats are only threats, yes?

Back to the original terms... I have stated in all ways of my ability that my use of "druggie" was not meant to be harmful, humiliating, dehumanising, critical, prejudice, or otherwise offensive. It was, as previously, frequently and very much fervently stated, not intended to be interpreted so. Firstly, you asked for an apology. I did abide and comply, for I had thought there was a great deal of failures in communication between us, and that was and is my reason for apology. But it is here again, where you demand a unanimous referendum solely on your terms. Are you so haughty and mighty yet so incredulous and disdained at the mere show of any conflicting and contradictory logic that you must defend your falsified position to the opposition at all costs? Is it the fear of losing your sought for erudition set-rule-set, that at any moment the little game of everything you've placed together could fall apart and be broken, and should there be any one person who should stand against you, this shall occur? I think so, but also not. I believe it is something you really care nothing for, not in the least.

As I've come to know you, I have also known you have what you call limits. For example, motherfucker. You do not like such a thing, as it derogates familial values. However, you yourself have used this in a quote, granted you did address this issue in the quote itself. However, when I say "druggie," which is an unofficially defined and rather oblique term, though given your definition it thus comes with a negative impact upon its arrival. What is the meaning of this? Is it not okay for me to use such a word within limits, set limits I accept, for it was not direct at you, but rather your own words and your own logic. You used, and glorified a quote with motherfucker in it. You also did announce such a word should not be used. I said, "Yes, druggie. Go do heroin. Does THAT sound like something you would want to hear? No. Then why say it to others?" This was in response to your thread on the topic of homosexuality. Let us now edit this quite: "Yes, faggot. Go get fucked in the ass." I said you were a hypocrite, and you most certainly are. You cannot handle anything that isn't what you want to hear, so your bigotry kicks in, and demand respect in the face of punishment. You remind me of Theodore Roosevelt, such an arrogant person who must have his way, and yet he did such good things as well.

Within all this, it is clearly shown: you have anger issues. You have not yet learned to control yourself, so you resort to any means to remove the annoyance, but the first attempt is to heal. You'd certainly feel better if the annoyance bent down and smiled upon your feet, rather than cutting it out and creating a bloody mess.

What is it that is so dear to you that you simply cannot make a compromise, understand another one's logic, or accept that you cannot always be right? But, no. That is not it, because you said so.

Respect, maybe? Respect can be earned or bought, but when purchased there's always a hitch somewhere, and when you hit it, there's nothing to stop the machine from crashing down.

I really don't know what to think of you. You're not a druggie, you do drugs. You love your family, you break your walls. My image of you has changed from that of respect to a state of uncertainty. I did respect you, blindly before and truthfully recently, but now that you demand respect, all is lost for you.

I am very content and calm, I try my best to avoid causing others pain. And I have succeeded in this in many ways in the past. You however, are the only one who has had such a grotesque problem with me, where you find my actions unsatisfactory to your higher-up standards. Really, what it is, is that people hide themselves from you, knowing that this Brutus will escape at the moment of any denial of your ways. There is a false reality surrounding you. Those who know you do not speak in such ways merely when around you, in fear, not in any sort of obscure respect or acceptance of your reasoning. By this, I do mean to say, even those closest to you only hold up a mask to filter out the horrid realty.

When you understand any other person, you will begin to understand me. What you think you know or understand simply is not true. Sure, "motherfucker" is a pretty ignorant and stupid thing to say. And respecting your parents and familial values is a wonderful thing. I did not ever, so much that I can recall, do this. I do like to lie. But with you, it is lie or die. Such a crude way to work out a one-sided compromise that never happened. Why was one never explicitly asked for? You are threatening and hostile to even a minimal or accidental conflict, which I tried by best to avoid. Growing on to my confidence that you will not take what I say wrong, I became bold with the obvious result. A one-sided argument favouring your point of view followed by continuous streamed threats.

By everything that is, was and shall be, let it be understood that you are the one who is inarticulate. My compromise was made by myself. Your compromise was a one-way line of thought based upon what I can only assume is a predisposition of yours against any outside contradiction.

But this is where I find a problem in reaching my goal in writing... you are incapable of understanding me, that is quite obvious. It is also obvious that you cannot understand anyone who is of my likes. Should one person dare speak anything unfavourable to you, you have a special place for them. It is no matter of mine beyond this point, whatever your choice may be. Pleasing you is no longer within my interests, I have more reasonable things to worry over, even more so at this time.

Consider this an apology on my terms, that on your terms would be bland to me. A formal note of my incorrectness is not what I consider to be an apology, and it seems to me that is what you are demanding at this point. Apologies can be in many ways, and your form of apology doesn't cut it for me. I favour logic over all else, and you do not make sense to me. It is utmost disappointing that you, such a logical yet hot-tempered person, are unable to comprehend what has been said here.

[Mi/c/healRein]

i read the first two paragraphs then got bored.

Nice wall text though kent

[Shota]

reserving this post.

[sponge cake recipe]

I'm curious to see what his reply is to this.

[xV]

Can't believe I read the entire thing. Deep shit Kent, deep shit.

[Cheat Engine User]

ITT: Why and how Irwin fails to be socially correct.

[Lyfa]

I can't wait to see his reply

[Hero]

ITT: irwin is mean to kent, and kent makes a post TL:DR

[bfsdbsdfbdsfb]

WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN ALL OF MY LIFE KENT?

[Mi/c/healRein]

[bfsdbsdfbdsfb]

www.yiff.in

[br0l0ck]

if I was irwin I would just reply with

"Fuck you, you nigger."

most wont know what Im talking about.

[Rin]

tl;dr either of them

[Rawss.]

So I heard Irwin has 'won' because he showed that he's a huge hypocrite by saying that he would gline people that were bashing on him, but then bashing on him himself.

[HackOtaku]

The internet is serious business.