| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Zcythe Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 679 Location: :noitacoL
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:31 am Post subject: Which proccesor? |
|
|
The Q6600, or the Q9400 about a 6 dollar difference on newegg. The 9400 is 45nm and the 6600 is 65nm is about the only difference I see, also the 6600's cache is bigger. So which one?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| You cannot judge a CPU based on cache and besides the process difference. There are other improvements with the Q9400.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
:^) Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 37
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 Posts: 1062
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The Q9400 is your best bet.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zcythe Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 679 Location: :noitacoL
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kls85 wrote: | | You cannot judge a CPU based on cache and besides the process difference. There are other improvements with the Q9400. |
Thats sort of why im asking...
Im asking what are the other differences, because thats all i can see.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SFP+ Comp. talk moderator
Reputation: 26
Joined: 02 May 2007 Posts: 1228 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| grimripper wrote: | | kls85 wrote: | | You cannot judge a CPU based on cache and besides the process difference. There are other improvements with the Q9400. |
Thats sort of why im asking...
Im asking what are the other differences, because thats all i can see.  |
Well, you'd rather want a 45nm CPU over a 65nm. Should be enough.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
According to Intel's site
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
Code name: Kentsfield
Frequency: 2.4GHz
FSB: 1066MHz
Cache L2: 8mb
Process: 65nm
Core voltage: 0.85-1.5v
Max Temp (Tcase): 62.2 Celsius
Max TDP: 105watts
Supports: EM64T, VanderPool, SpeedStep, and XD disable bit
CPU life span (terms of manufacturing): 2+ years
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9400 (the non-S version)
Code name: Yorkfield
Frequency: 2.66GHz
FSB: 1333MHz
Cache L2: 6mb
Process: 45nm
Core voltage: 0.850-1.3625v
Max Temp (Tcase): 71.4 Celsius
Max TDP: 95watts
Supports: EM64T, VanderPool, SoeedStep, LaGrande, XD disable bit, and Stable Image Platform
CPU life spand (terms of manufacturing): 7+ years
S= Max TDP: 65watts
Last edited by kls85 on Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iTz SWAT I post too much
Reputation: 1
Joined: 20 Dec 2007 Posts: 2227 Location: Me.Location;
|
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 6:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Q9400
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Humper Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Jan 2007 Posts: 1545
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
If your not overclocking then take the Q9400.
BUT if you do overclock, the Q6600 will work great and
probebly alot/abit btr.
For those people that say you shouldn't look at cache,
you have to look at that.
It give ALOT more preformance often especially when overclocking.
Regards,
Humper
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zcythe Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 679 Location: :noitacoL
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was hoping to overclock, Would the Q9400 go up to 3ghz?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Imitazion Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 558
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| grimripper wrote: | | I was hoping to overclock, Would the Q9400 go up to 3ghz? |
That shouldn't be a problem.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zcythe Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 679 Location: :noitacoL
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Would it handle it on stock cooler? Cause i was thinking about getting an artic 7.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Imitazion Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 19 Oct 2006 Posts: 558
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I believe it would, I've never tried though. Maybe you could do some research on youtube?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The older Q6600 can do 3GHz on the stock cooler. But there's factors other than just temperatures. Your motherboard might not be able to handle a high, 1600MHz FSB.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zcythe Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 2
Joined: 17 Dec 2007 Posts: 679 Location: :noitacoL
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i have a P5N-D, im not too good with motherboards. Dont really know anything
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 6:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The board you got will support most Quad cores starting with the Q6400 all the way to Q9650 including the "S" versions, but you will need to update your bios first in order for it to be recognized.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|