| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which to choose? |
| Samsung 2493HM |
|
50% |
[ 3 ] |
| BenQ V2400W |
|
50% |
[ 3 ] |
| BenQ G2400WD |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Mozilla Firefox Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 1250
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The Benq V2400W looks sick!
Also Samsung links not working? _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozilla Firefox Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 1250
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Woah; fast response.
It's working fine for me; try again? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I get forbidden error
But ya the Benq V2400W would be the choice for me _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
superweapons Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 1355 Location: The Internet. Where else?
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The V2400W's base looks somewhat unstable. But regardless of that fact, I would still go with Samsung's 2493HM from my personal experiences of quality/reliability with them. _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozilla Firefox Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 1250
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NeverForgotten wrote: | I get forbidden error
But ya the Benq V2400W would be the choice for me |
Here's an 'alternative' image, I guess:
http://www.globalgroup.net.au/gloshop/image.php?productid=24159
| superweapons wrote: | | The V2400W's base looks somewhat unstable. But regardless of that fact, I would still go with Samsung's 2493HM from my personal experiences of quality/reliability with them. |
Well, the Samsung 2493HM is $80 more expensive than the other monitors stated, is the extra money worth over the quality and reliability? Or should I go with one of the BenQ's and retrieve some extra cash for my pocket? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd still go with the Benq V2400W _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozilla Firefox Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 1250
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also. Warranty.
BenQ, if the monitor encounters dead pixels/bright pixels, you must have at least 3 or more for it to be returned.
Samsung, on the other hand, has a zero-tolerance dead pixels/bright pixels policy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NeverForgotten Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 2
Joined: 20 Oct 2007 Posts: 1616 Location: Wii
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd go with Benq as I have one right now, it was replaced for free about a year ago because somehow it had a small hole in the screen(dont know why)
and they replaced it for free _________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozilla Firefox Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 1250
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok.
superweapons - Samsung 2493HM
NeverForgotten - BenQ V2400W
Anymore contributors? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WinRAR Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 890 Location: skullfucking dead children
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| V2400W. Looks freaking sexy as. And it has HDMI. It also is Full HD. So 1920x1080. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozilla Firefox Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 1250
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It's native resolution is 1900 x 1200. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WinRAR Grandmaster Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 16 Mar 2007 Posts: 890 Location: skullfucking dead children
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mozilla Firefox Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Feb 2007 Posts: 1250
|
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok.
2 - V2400W
1 - 2493HM
0 - G2400WD
& oh yes, my bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Karakawe I post too much
Reputation: 3
Joined: 17 Apr 2007 Posts: 3899
|
Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
I wouldn't choose the V2400W, solely by its appearance. That's just preference, mind you. It's quite thin, only about 6cm at its thickest point.
The rest pretty much comes down to features. If you need 1:1 HDMI pixel mapping, don't get the Samsung. If you don't, however, I would recommend it: it looks great, and has a good featureset. Put me down for the 2493HM.
Oh, and all three of the monitors are full 1080p, I believe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|