Cheat Engine

.sephiroth. · Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 8:36 pm Post subject: disproof, big bang

discuss the attachment

xj0njrx · Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:30 pm Post subject:

space is something, it cant be nothing... nothing can be nothing... so if there was nothing where did the explosion come from?..

redslothx · Posted: Sun May 25, 2008 9:54 pm Post subject:

technically, its impossible to have nothing.

because by having nothing, you do have something, you have nothing.

therefore, the universe was forced to exist out of nothingness

try imagining a universe with nothing.

you'd probly think some blank thing, well that thing is something.

therefore, nothing = something.

,_,

Missi0n · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 6:49 am Post subject:

Dr Evil is right.

energy can be stored in the smallest amount of space.
black holes are supposed to be "the absence of energy"

There clearly was something. it's probably related to the was an atomic bomb works, splitting atoms.

Makaveli · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 10:40 am Post subject:

So where did this 'something' come from?
I don't liek when people accept the fact that 'it was just there'
Doesn't make sense, it HAD to come from somewhere.. but where ?

Bannedjsin95 · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 12:46 pm Post subject:

face it.
it is too much for us to comprehend

Monkeys · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 12:49 pm Post subject:

Aviar³ · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:01 pm Post subject:

The serious fact is that the absence of something allowed the universe to come into existence. Think about a rocket, if I launched it on earth under the effect of gravity and a multitude of other factors, it would go far. Now think about me launching it where there is "nothing", no gravity, nothing. It would go much farther with less energy.With the lack of quantum mechanics, physics and laws of the universe, anything could happen within that brief limbo between something and nothing. We cant comprehend it because in order to you would have to understand nothing and something, and you would have to imagine a state of existence where there are no laws, and the impossible can happen. Thing would contradict themselves in that state(thus leading to an infinite amount of paradoxes). In short, nothing made it easier for the big bang to happen, in fact it could have happened with the minutest of energy.

Monkeys · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:08 pm Post subject:

redslothx · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:15 pm Post subject:

Cryoma · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:24 pm Post subject:

He's saying that the effect of every something is heightened in the presence of nothing.

redslothx · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:28 pm Post subject:

Monkeys · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject:

He's not talking about the fire. He's talking about the FORCE behind it.

Aviar³ · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject:

redslothx · Posted: Mon May 26, 2008 1:41 pm Post subject:

gosh, was using fire as an example for cryomas statement Rolling Eyes

which is that if you have something, and you take something away from it, it will become better... (this is what i got from his reply)

which is obviously false, cuz you can take away soemthing from something else and make it completely useless.

------
Edit:

the rocket thing isnt random, we know why and how much energy a rocket needs to get from point A to point B.

if you shoot a rocket into space, gravity will slow it down.
if there was no gravity, it woul simply just keep on going untill something else interferes with it...

still dont see what is so random about that o_o