 |
Cheat Engine The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Irwin Banned!
Reputation: 1
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:07 am Post subject: Feature Request |
|
|
I'd like to request custom breakpoint handlers, preferably controllable through auto-assembler. These breakpoints would both accommodate for hardware & software, allowing the user to jump to a handler thus giving it control. Not only would this make the lives of people who use auto-assembler in partisan with breakpoints easier, it would create a much more effective detour method.
Example:
Code: | alloc(cave, 100)
hwbp(400AB2, cave)
bp(400BA2, cave)
cave:
xor eax, eax
jmp 400A94 |
I also believe that there is a third-party CE modification which accommodates for this, done by CoLDDoT, so you should probably ask him if he has it.
Last edited by Irwin on Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:10 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte Site Admin
Reputation: 470
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 25788 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's possible but I wouldn't call it hwbp or bp
Rather call it hwbpChangeEIPTo(bpaddress,eipvalue)
Since if this is added people would also want other registers, and perhaps even the separate bits of the eflags register
hmm, or just call it BPDetour(address,detourroutine) so people don't start expecting a hwbpChangeEAX or hwbpTickZF...
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Irwin Banned!
Reputation: 1
Joined: 04 Feb 2007 Posts: 0
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dark Byte wrote: | It's possible but I wouldn't call it hwbp or bp
Rather call it hwbpChangeEIPTo(bpaddress,eipvalue)
Since if this is added people would also want other registers, and perhaps even the separate bits of the eflags register
hmm, or just call it BPDetour(address,detourroutine) so people don't start expecting a hwbpChangeEAX or hwbpTickZF... |
Yes, that would be better.
hwbp(address, register/zflag, newvalue)
That would be optimal in my eyes.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|