The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
yeah, where you're attributing words and meaning beyond what i have conveyed
The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
yeah, where you're attributing words and meaning beyond what i have conveyed
You mentioned both of them. Trying to pirate a good Torah to learn Hebrew. How is that NOT mentioning Hebrew in the context of the Torah?
The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
yeah, where you're attributing words and meaning beyond what i have conveyed
You mentioned both of them. Trying to pirate a good Torah to learn Hebrew. How is that NOT mentioning Hebrew in the context of the Torah?
The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
yeah, where you're attributing words and meaning beyond what i have conveyed
You mentioned both of them. Trying to pirate a good Torah to learn Hebrew. How is that NOT mentioning Hebrew in the context of the Torah?
Can you even read what you said? You just told me that he apparently brought up Hebrew/the Torah and then bolded yourself doing it. What the fuck is wrong with you?
The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
yeah, where you're attributing words and meaning beyond what i have conveyed
You mentioned both of them. Trying to pirate a good Torah to learn Hebrew. How is that NOT mentioning Hebrew in the context of the Torah?
Can you even read what you said? You just told me that he apparently brought up Hebrew/the Torah and then bolded yourself doing it. What the fuck is wrong with you?
are you using a declaration tautologically as evidence of error or hypocrisy?
you blatantly just aren't understanding. idk why you can't read. nowhere did i say that "he apparently brought up hebrew/the torah". the fuck?
The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
yeah, where you're attributing words and meaning beyond what i have conveyed
You mentioned both of them. Trying to pirate a good Torah to learn Hebrew. How is that NOT mentioning Hebrew in the context of the Torah?
Can you even read what you said? You just told me that he apparently brought up Hebrew/the Torah and then bolded yourself doing it. What the fuck is wrong with you?
are you using a declaration tautologically as evidence of error or hypocrisy?
you blatantly just aren't understanding. idk why you can't read. nowhere did i say that "he apparently brought up hebrew/the torah". the fuck?
"but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did."
There are two ways you could have meant this. Either one you mean that you didn't mention the Torah in relation the Hebrew or two you mean that you didn't mention the Torah at all. Both of which are just untrue. You mentioned the Torah AND Hebrew yourself so to say that he is the one that brought up religion, mentioned any of it or anything similar is just dishonest.
Can you even read what you said? You just told me that he apparently brought up Hebrew/the Torah and then bolded yourself doing it. What the fuck is wrong with you?
are you using a declaration tautologically as evidence of error or hypocrisy?
you blatantly just aren't understanding. idk why you can't read. nowhere did i say that "he apparently brought up hebrew/the torah". the fuck?
"but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did."
There are two ways you could have meant this. Either one you mean that you didn't mention the Torah in relation the Hebrew or two you mean that you didn't mention the Torah at all. Both of which are just untrue. You mentioned the Torah AND Hebrew yourself so to say that he is the one that brought up religion, mentioned any of it or anything similar is just dishonest.
dood. i literally said that i did not bring up the torah because of religious motivations, and that kyle was the one who transitioned the topic of the torah onto religious conversation.
"either you mean that"
"you didn't mention the torah in relation the hebrew"
wat
i don't know what that means and that isn't /at all/ what i said, nor does it mean what i said
"or you didn't mention the torah at all"
seriously? that's what you're asserting i said? can u read? i said i did not do it bc of religion. can u get that?
greatsage wrote:
konr wrote:
greatsage wrote:
konr wrote:
greatsage wrote:
konr wrote:
greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
The discussion was whether or not he was getting mad just because you said hebrew, not whether he was right or wrong in saying things he said. I don't see how he was motivated by you saying hebrew, but instead motivated by the fact that he thinks studying religion is foolish in itself. I think you know this as well, and are twisting words around to make him seem more childish.
bc if i said danish or dutch he wouldn't have said jack shit
That's because you were citing the religious text and that happens to be written in Hebrew. It has nothing to do with the fucking language you blind cunt.
??? r u blind
Are you?
You literally mention Danish and Dutch to say he wouldn't say anything while he flipped out about you mentioning Hebrew AND the Torah because of RELIGION not the fucking language.
but i didnt mention the torah bc of religion. he did.
The first thing that you even say:
[9:12:46 PM] Taylor Liddell: trying to pirate good torah to learn hebrew
[9:12:49 PM] Taylor Liddell: alongside arabic
You say both Torah and Hebrew here. Am I missing something?
yeah, where you're attributing words and meaning beyond what i have conveyed
Can you actually read at all? I wasn't saying that you were saying the latter, I'm giving the two possible things you could be saying when reading what you wrote. Obviously you did mention the Torah so the latter is not true, and the only other option is the other thing I said.
"you didn't mention the Torah in relation the Hebrew"
The above is what was after the word "that" and I don't really understand how it's hard to read? You mentioned the Torah, and then Hebrew. Whether or not Kyle then transitioned to talking about actual religion is irrelevant, because what we are saying is that you spoke about the Torah (which is a religious text) and studying that book to learn Hebrew. So you mentioned both of these things in the context of the religious text. He then expressed his opinions on the pointlessness of reading and researching religious texts which would even include with the intention to learn Hebrew.
Now do you understand? Probably not as it seems in the past few years you've lost the ability to read correctly.
Can you actually read at all? I wasn't saying that you were saying the latter, I'm giving the two possible things you could be saying when reading what you wrote. Obviously you did mention the Torah so the latter is not true, and the only other option is the other thing I said.
"you didn't mention the Torah in relation the Hebrew"
The above is what was after the word "that" and I don't really understand how it's hard to read? You mentioned the Torah, and then Hebrew. Whether or not Kyle then transitioned to talking about actual religion is irrelevant, because what we are saying is that you spoke about the Torah (which is a religious text) and studying that book to learn Hebrew. So you mentioned both of these things in the context of learning the language. He then expressed needlessly his opinions on the pointlessness of reading and researching religious texts which would even include with the intention to learn Hebrew. (which were simply incorrect)
Now do you understand? Probably not as it seems in the past few years you've lost the ability to read correctly.
i understand perfectly. fixed a few things for you
It does not matter at all whether it was needless. You specifically said that it was the word Hebrew that set him off, but THAT IS UNTRUE. It was so obviously untrue to everyone else and I even believe you can see that but as HackOtaku said you just wanted to poke at him and call him childish a bit more. He did this because you mentioned A RELIGIOUS TEXT AND RESEARCHING IT, not because you mentioned Hebrew.
EDIT:
I did not admit to that, as that is not true. There are two logical options when reading the English infront of us. The only way you could put another one in there is if you attribute you wording it completely differently but you did not.
It does not matter at all whether it was needless. You specifically said that it was the word Hebrew that set him off, but THAT IS UNTRUE. It was so obviously untrue to everyone else and I even believe you can see that but as HackOtaku said you just wanted to poke at him and call him childish a bit more. He did this because you mentioned A RELIGIOUS TEXT AND RESEARCHING IT, not because you mentioned Hebrew.
obviously was the word hebrew, danish or dutch would not have set him off. yet hebrew did. also i mentioned a text that is commonly used with the language. if i said danish and a hans christian andersen anthology he wouldn't have said shit. my point stands.
konr wrote:
EDIT:
I did not admit to that, as that is not true. There are two logical options when reading the English infront of us. The only way you could put another one in there is if you attribute you wording it completely differently but you did not.
but we already established you completely failed at reading entirely. oh well.
It does not matter at all whether it was needless. You specifically said that it was the word Hebrew that set him off, but THAT IS UNTRUE. It was so obviously untrue to everyone else and I even believe you can see that but as HackOtaku said you just wanted to poke at him and call him childish a bit more. He did this because you mentioned A RELIGIOUS TEXT AND RESEARCHING IT, not because you mentioned Hebrew.
obviously was the word hebrew, danish or dutch would not have set him off. yet hebrew did. also i mentioned a text that is commonly used with the language. if i said danish and a hans christian andersen anthology he wouldn't have said shit. my point stands.
konr wrote:
EDIT:
I did not admit to that, as that is not true. There are two logical options when reading the English infront of us. The only way you could put another one in there is if you attribute you wording it completely differently but you did not.
but we already established you completely failed at reading entirely. oh well.
It does not matter at all whether it was needless. You specifically said that it was the word Hebrew that set him off, but THAT IS UNTRUE. It was so obviously untrue to everyone else and I even believe you can see that but as HackOtaku said you just wanted to poke at him and call him childish a bit more. He did this because you mentioned A RELIGIOUS TEXT AND RESEARCHING IT, not because you mentioned Hebrew.
obviously was the word hebrew, danish or dutch would not have set him off. yet hebrew did. also i mentioned a text that is commonly used with the language. if i said danish and a hans christian andersen anthology he wouldn't have said shit. my point stands.
konr wrote:
EDIT:
I did not admit to that, as that is not true. There are two logical options when reading the English infront of us. The only way you could put another one in there is if you attribute you wording it completely differently but you did not.
but we already established you completely failed at reading entirely. oh well.
How about the word Torah you fucking moron?
yup. hebrew text, how about it? and what's with the name calling, aw you mad?
It does not matter at all whether it was needless. You specifically said that it was the word Hebrew that set him off, but THAT IS UNTRUE. It was so obviously untrue to everyone else and I even believe you can see that but as HackOtaku said you just wanted to poke at him and call him childish a bit more. He did this because you mentioned A RELIGIOUS TEXT AND RESEARCHING IT, not because you mentioned Hebrew.
obviously was the word hebrew, danish or dutch would not have set him off. yet hebrew did. also i mentioned a text that is commonly used with the language. if i said danish and a hans christian andersen anthology he wouldn't have said shit. my point stands.
konr wrote:
EDIT:
I did not admit to that, as that is not true. There are two logical options when reading the English infront of us. The only way you could put another one in there is if you attribute you wording it completely differently but you did not.
but we already established you completely failed at reading entirely. oh well.
How about the word Torah you fucking moron?
yup. hebrew text, how about it? and what's with the name calling, aw you mad?
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4Next
Page 3 of 4
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Reputation: 13
