| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
br0l0ck Cheater
Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007 Posts: 38
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
you're unnecessarily making this into a slippery slope situation that is not inherent to the argument.
how does jerking your dick to drawings compare to having a child sized doll that you can act out a fantasy with that may push you (a child molester) to commit the actual act? it doesn't, loli is childlike characters but they do not represent real life, the line between fictional drawings that are not drawn to mimic real life and a physical object that directly represents your desire are different.
now if you were saying that hyper realistic drawings of children in a sexual setting should be illegal as well, then I think most people would agree. taking the line to loli is too far.
by your logic, cp should be legal too, because the pictures have been taken and the harm has already been done, whats wrong with someone masturbating to their fetish?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Viloresi Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 02 Feb 2017 Posts: 149
|
Posted: Wed Mar 29, 2017 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Honestly for me that picture is creepy af!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cryoma Member of the Year
Reputation: 198
Joined: 14 Jan 2009 Posts: 1819
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No because the only way to produce cp is to take advantage of actual children
drawing loli or making dolls has nothing to do with real children, it's all a fantasy either way
think blood diamonds vs synthetic
the ethical issue isn't the product, it's where it came from
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deleted User 197371 Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A bit of envy mixed with genuine disgust is what I'm sensing here.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|