only 5 % of terrorist attacks are made by Muslims and most of it is inside Muslim countries.
Exactly, so why do we need to demonize them? Trump is a monster thriving off of racist white America
BECAUSE THE JEWS RUN THE FUCKING MEDIA
IS IT THAT HARD TO FIGURE OUT
JEWS = ALL OF THE PROBLEMS
pick a problem: the jews are fucking behind it
no, honestly. the media wants to demonize muslims. who literally runs the media and directly benefits off of this? the jews
"The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the "agentur" (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.
The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.
The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time."
The liberal media unfairly attack Trump in every way. The funny thing is, despite Donald Trump trending everyday for some "controversy", he still remains first in all the polls with no signs of slowing.
The vocal minority can cry and pout all they want, because the silent majority is with Trump.
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 48 Location: California
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2015 9:18 pm Post subject:
greatsage wrote:
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
nice baseless prediction mr I took a logic class so I spot bullshit or a bad argument easily _________________
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
nice baseless prediction mr I took a logic class so I spot bullshit or a bad argument easily
Trump's plan is to inflict tremendous pain on vulnerable people who have, in most cases, done nothing wrong. In some instances, he wants to inflict that pain in order to make another, more powerful actor do something he wants. In some cases, he seems to want to inflict that pain for no particular reason at all. But his plan, read in its totality, is breathtaking in its callousness.
If you understand immigration policy as a kind of negotiation between the United States government, legal immigrants, and unauthorized immigrants — which is clearly how Trump understands it — his plan is to win the negotiation by being willing to inflict more suffering than the other actors can bear; he is willing to care least about the human cost of the negotiation.
u rly dont think "rounding 'em up" isn't going to involve a lot of abuse?
bc trump has already promised it wouldnt be pretty.
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
nice baseless prediction mr I took a logic class so I spot bullshit or a bad argument easily
Trump's plan is to inflict tremendous pain on vulnerable people who have, in most cases, done nothing wrong. In some instances, he wants to inflict that pain in order to make another, more powerful actor do something he wants. In some cases, he seems to want to inflict that pain for no particular reason at all. But his plan, read in its totality, is breathtaking in its callousness.
If you understand immigration policy as a kind of negotiation between the United States government, legal immigrants, and unauthorized immigrants — which is clearly how Trump understands it — his plan is to win the negotiation by being willing to inflict more suffering than the other actors can bear; he is willing to care least about the human cost of the negotiation.
u rly dont think "rounding 'em up" isn't going to involve a lot of abuse?
bc trump has already promised it wouldnt be pretty.
2 bad ur a dum troll & just got whipped
there's no point trying to talk sense into antagonist. He's a BELIEVER of reaganomics and republican ideologues, instead of looking at everything as a case by case basis with relevant facts. He isn't an independent thinker. The fact that he's a Trump supporter should be enough to let you know that he doesn't use his brain, he's actively making the ground he stands upon and the situation worse deliberately. He's determined that Trump is the answer. let him be stupid, don't try to persuade him at this point. Once he realizes he's in bad company (Him and Shot are like the only Trump supporters here.) he might change his mind.
And don't get me wrong, it's not like I don't understand the right wing mindset. I watch Fox News and Right wing media sources close to everyday, just so I can make sure those are the people I can't support. When your entire party's motive is to do nothing and block democrats from doing anything, you don't have a political party. Lets just keep blaming the only people actually putting forward policies though.
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
nice baseless prediction mr I took a logic class so I spot bullshit or a bad argument easily
Trump's plan is to inflict tremendous pain on vulnerable people who have, in most cases, done nothing wrong. In some instances, he wants to inflict that pain in order to make another, more powerful actor do something he wants. In some cases, he seems to want to inflict that pain for no particular reason at all. But his plan, read in its totality, is breathtaking in its callousness.
If you understand immigration policy as a kind of negotiation between the United States government, legal immigrants, and unauthorized immigrants — which is clearly how Trump understands it — his plan is to win the negotiation by being willing to inflict more suffering than the other actors can bear; he is willing to care least about the human cost of the negotiation.
u rly dont think "rounding 'em up" isn't going to involve a lot of abuse?
bc trump has already promised it wouldnt be pretty.
2 bad ur a dum troll & just got whipped
there's no point trying to talk sense into antagonist. He's a BELIEVER of reaganomics and republican ideologues, instead of looking at everything as a case by case basis with relevant facts. He isn't an independent thinker. The fact that he's a Trump supporter should be enough to let you know that he doesn't use his brain, he's actively making the ground he stands upon and the situation worse deliberately. He's determined that Trump is the answer. let him be stupid, don't try to persuade him at this point. Once he realizes he's in bad company (Him and Shot are like the only Trump supporters here.) he might change his mind.
And don't get me wrong, it's not like I don't understand the right wing mindset. I watch Fox News and Right wing media sources close to everyday, just so I can make sure those are the people I can't support. When your entire party's motive is to do nothing and block democrats from doing anything, you don't have a political party. Lets just keep blaming the only people actually putting forward policies though.
Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 48 Location: California
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2015 3:11 am Post subject:
greatsage wrote:
Antagonist wrote:
greatsage wrote:
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
nice baseless prediction mr I took a logic class so I spot bullshit or a bad argument easily
Trump's plan is to inflict tremendous pain on vulnerable people who have, in most cases, done nothing wrong. In some instances, he wants to inflict that pain in order to make another, more powerful actor do something he wants. In some cases, he seems to want to inflict that pain for no particular reason at all. But his plan, read in its totality, is breathtaking in its callousness.
If you understand immigration policy as a kind of negotiation between the United States government, legal immigrants, and unauthorized immigrants — which is clearly how Trump understands it — his plan is to win the negotiation by being willing to inflict more suffering than the other actors can bear; he is willing to care least about the human cost of the negotiation.
u rly dont think "rounding 'em up" isn't going to involve a lot of abuse?
bc trump has already promised it wouldnt be pretty.
2 bad ur a dum troll & just got whipped
The article is as biased and baseless as your predictions. It's all this is gonna happen that's gonna happen with ZERO concrete evidence to support it. I don't know what your background is but mine is business, sales, negotiations, marketing, and strategy. So I spend hours in a day reading and studying anything related to business including WORLD CLASS business men and negotiators like Donald Trump. And the article does not understand negotiations at all as he claims he does.
The WHOLE entire article is based on this one sentence alone that's stated in the beginning: "There's an old saying that in a negotiation, he who cares least wins."
He doesn't even understand what that saying means and the irony is that he bases his "predictions" on that one liner. How the fuck do you even make an argument on one principle of negotiation like that? You do understand negotiation is a very complicated subject on itself? It's an art that is practiced immensely, but of course I don't expect your one dimensional mind to understand that. So Ezra Klein, who clearly has no knowledge about the art of negotiation based on his article. He political reporter not a business reporter. He couldn't even launch the business he wanted when he left the Washington Post oh and by the way The Washington Post said no to his business proposal and he left to try to be bigger than them. Clearly failed.
He thinks the principle of he who cares the least means being a soulless demon. Which is clearly not. And by the way this is a principle that is used in industries such as real estate, banking, and car business. No where else. You try to use this principle with venture capitalists you will get slaughtered.
So for him to compare a real estate principle to a political project is incredibly naive of him. Donald Trump does not use the same techniques he uses in real estate the same in his TV show, his books, or any of his other business. Because that's not how business is. It's not a static thing. It's being nimble and adaptable because different markets different elements are always changing. And that's why 9/10 business fail by year two because people don't know how to adapt and change strategies. That's why Klein does not have a clue what he's talking about as far as Trumps immigration plan. He does not have the mind of a business person. And that's why his article has zero credibility and any person who has actual logic knows that this article is biased and baseless.
Also, Trump didn't promise that. He said it would be humane assuming that he will actually go through with the plan as if it's step by step plan.
Remember this, Trump has a 69 year quality track record of being a SMART business man. That means great decision making skills, great at building relationships, great at leaderships. He has not screwed anybody. He has not been disloyal to anybody. Everyone he does business with respects him. OH and guess which creditor he "screwed over" when he filed for bankruptcy? Carl Icahn. Arguably the best investor of all time. Who endorses him as well. _________________
if elected he basically plans to enact nazi tactics on a population of at least 10 million people. there will be a lot of violence, rape, and murder. it is almost a promise of civil war.
what a tool.
nice baseless prediction mr I took a logic class so I spot bullshit or a bad argument easily
Trump's plan is to inflict tremendous pain on vulnerable people who have, in most cases, done nothing wrong. In some instances, he wants to inflict that pain in order to make another, more powerful actor do something he wants. In some cases, he seems to want to inflict that pain for no particular reason at all. But his plan, read in its totality, is breathtaking in its callousness.
If you understand immigration policy as a kind of negotiation between the United States government, legal immigrants, and unauthorized immigrants — which is clearly how Trump understands it — his plan is to win the negotiation by being willing to inflict more suffering than the other actors can bear; he is willing to care least about the human cost of the negotiation.
u rly dont think "rounding 'em up" isn't going to involve a lot of abuse?
bc trump has already promised it wouldnt be pretty.
2 bad ur a dum troll & just got whipped
The article is as biased and baseless as your predictions. It's all this is gonna happen that's gonna happen with ZERO concrete evidence to support it. I don't know what your background is but mine is business, sales, negotiations, marketing, and strategy. So I spend hours in a day reading and studying anything related to business including WORLD CLASS business men and negotiators like Donald Trump. And the article does not understand negotiations at all as he claims he does.
The WHOLE entire article is based on this one sentence alone that's stated in the beginning: "There's an old saying that in a negotiation, he who cares least wins."
He doesn't even understand what that saying means and the irony is that he bases his "predictions" on that one liner. How the fuck do you even make an argument on one principle of negotiation like that? You do understand negotiation is a very complicated subject on itself? It's an art that is practiced immensely, but of course I don't expect your one dimensional mind to understand that. So Ezra Klein, who clearly has no knowledge about the art of negotiation based on his article. He political reporter not a business reporter. He couldn't even launch the business he wanted when he left the Washington Post oh and by the way The Washington Post said no to his business proposal and he left to try to be bigger than them. Clearly failed.
He thinks the principle of he who cares the least means being a soulless demon. Which is clearly not. And by the way this is a principle that is used in industries such as real estate, banking, and car business. No where else. You try to use this principle with venture capitalists you will get slaughtered.
So for him to compare a real estate principle to a political project is incredibly naive of him. Donald Trump does not use the same techniques he uses in real estate the same in his TV show, his books, or any of his other business. Because that's not how business is. It's not a static thing. It's being nimble and adaptable because different markets different elements are always changing. And that's why 9/10 business fail by year two because people don't know how to adapt and change strategies. That's why Klein does not have a clue what he's talking about as far as Trumps immigration plan. He does not have the mind of a business person. And that's why his article has zero credibility and any person who has actual logic knows that this article is biased and baseless.
Also, Trump didn't promise that. He said it would be humane assuming that he will actually go through with the plan as if it's step by step plan.
Remember this, Trump has a 69 year quality track record of being a SMART business man. That means great decision making skills, great at building relationships, great at leaderships. He has not screwed anybody. He has not been disloyal to anybody. Everyone he does business with respects him. OH and guess which creditor he "screwed over" when he filed for bankruptcy? Carl Icahn. Arguably the best investor of all time. Who endorses him as well.
read the first few words. realised gannok was right. you're outta contact with reality and refuse to face facts. the website had plenty of sources and you can find plenty more. trump is a rapist. fact.
idgas about whatever else you wrote, you're challeneged
as for "zero evidence" the article links to the fucking immigration policies by trump. dumbass
All times are GMT - 6 Hours Goto page Previous1, 2, 3, 4Next
Page 2 of 4
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
Reputation: 23
Reputation: 157
Reputation: 13
Reputation: 130
Reputation: 1
Reputation: 29
