| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
gogodr
I post too much
 Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
 Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:28 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Up2Admin wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | DKMikey wrote: | I'm using CS4.
My philosophy normally is
Newer = Better (please notice the word normally). |
Vista was never better than XP |
I have Vista, it's far better. I haven't had ONE problem that wasn't easily fixed.
As for XP, I had to reinstall it like 4 times because it kept fucking up.
Yes there are new errors, plenty, but all-in-all it has just about as many errors as XP. The errors just appear to be more visible+frequent on Vista.
Almost all the new errors lie within Vista 64-bit which is exactly what I'm using. Vista 32-bit is just like using XP but with new interface, addons, etc...
So if anyone here gets Vista and you don't want to fix any bugs/errors, then 32-bit is the way to go. You won't get some of the fancy interface customization options, but it functions much more smoothly than 64-bit. |
microsoft already admitted that Vista was a failure there is not point in fighting again over this xP
Vista was a failure mostly because of the unnecessary ram & processor eating
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Humper
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Jan 2007
Posts: 1545
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| gogodr wrote: | | Up2Admin wrote: | | gogodr wrote: | | DKMikey wrote: | I'm using CS4.
My philosophy normally is
Newer = Better (please notice the word normally). |
Vista was never better than XP |
I have Vista, it's far better. I haven't had ONE problem that wasn't easily fixed.
As for XP, I had to reinstall it like 4 times because it kept fucking up.
Yes there are new errors, plenty, but all-in-all it has just about as many errors as XP. The errors just appear to be more visible+frequent on Vista.
Almost all the new errors lie within Vista 64-bit which is exactly what I'm using. Vista 32-bit is just like using XP but with new interface, addons, etc...
So if anyone here gets Vista and you don't want to fix any bugs/errors, then 32-bit is the way to go. You won't get some of the fancy interface customization options, but it functions much more smoothly than 64-bit. |
microsoft already admitted that Vista was a failure there is not point in fighting again over this xP
Vista was a failure mostly because of the unnecessary ram & processor eating |
True.
I gonna go from XP 32bit to Win7 64bit very soon.
XP 64bit, sucks way to buggy.
XP 32bit > Vista 32bit
Vista 64 > Xp 64
Win7 64 > All other windows'es
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gogodr
I post too much
Reputation: 125
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 2041
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yeah xP well I'm on windows 7 x64 right now and its a little more ram eater tahn xp but less than vista
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Daniel.
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 72
Joined: 08 Nov 2007
Posts: 2938
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CS4 is awesome
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Skittles
Expert Cheater
 Reputation: -1
Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Posts: 137
Location: Ermm...why you wanna know? Stalker much?
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| shadowkid wrote: | | CS4 is awesome |
Yeppurz.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chidori
Grandmaster Cheater
![]() Reputation: 1
Joined: 25 Apr 2008
Posts: 691
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I use CS3
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nantesnandare
I post too much
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 2231
Location: §Â£âǧ©
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
For me : Adobe Photoshop CS4 Extended
_________________
...::: PARAMORE BAND :::...
| Hitler wrote: | | I'm a stupid faggot who fucked my grandmother 3x a day! |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jeff
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
 Reputation: 1
Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 1604
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PS7
fuck you CS fags.
there are WAY more things compatible with 7.
HERPDERP, I used CS2+ though.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Censored
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Dec 2006
Posts: 441
Location: Suspended animation
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| redslothx wrote: | <3 CS2
I thought CS3 sucked, and I haven't tried out CS4 yet.
is there any actual difference between them all asides from how they look? |
This. I only use PS for recreational work so CS2 is good enough. I haven't seen a need to change to CS4 yet 
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Anthonywolfe
Master Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Jul 2008
Posts: 266
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Strathe wrote: | | CS4 Obviously, since i just started. |
same
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mr. Skittles
Expert Cheater
Reputation: -1
Joined: 12 Oct 2007
Posts: 137
Location: Ermm...why you wanna know? Stalker much?
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, I honestly do not know what they differ in. Don't they all pretty much have the same features or something?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Waly
Master Cheater
![]() Reputation: -1
Joined: 25 Nov 2008
Posts: 293
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm an extreme beginner, but I have CS4.
Is CS2 any simpler than CS4?
Also, which one takes up less visual space? I'm using a 15 inch monitor at the moment. I intend to get a 22" widescreen in the near future, but which would be best for my current situation?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Phixen
I post too much
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Oct 2008
Posts: 4123
|
| Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I prefer CS4, only version I've ever used and I don't plan on trying out the others any time soon.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
