kls85 I post too much
Reputation: 22
Joined: 18 Jul 2008 Posts: 2757 Location: Under ur bed
|
Posted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 9:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Cheetah wrote: | | rapion124 wrote: | Who would buy a core 2 duo when it's 3 generations behind? The Q6600 is the same price as the E8400, while it offers much better performance in multi-threaded applications. So what if your current games don't use multi-threading? That doesn't mean new games a few months from now won't utilize 4 cores.
Btw, most games aren't bottlenecked by the CPU. Only RTS games will require a lot of processing power, so a better CPU will not give you better frame rates in FPS games.
It's never bad to have more performance, especially for the same price. |
Multi-threading is still almost non-existent in the software world, and 2 fast cores is better than four slow ones. Two cores overloaded and two unutilized cores isn't exactly an ideal configuration. By the time multi-threading finally catches on current quads will be far obsolete. It was the same situation with 64-bit on the A64. |
Multi-threaded apps are everywhere, but since most of use just use it for games we assume multi-thread apps are almost non-existent.
True that a faster dual core will beat a slower quad core, but when it comes to editing pictures, videos in HD, or do other professional work e.g. 3Ds Max, Photoshop, doing intense calculations in excel, a quad core will be beneficial over a dual core.
|
|