| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Which One? |
| 32-Bit OS |
|
80% |
[ 12 ] |
| 64-Bit OS |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
| Author |
Message |
appalsap Moderator
Reputation: 0
Joined: 27 Apr 2006 Posts: 6753 Location: Pakistan
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Proprietary software companies release software (and more importantly, drivers!!) in X-bit version only, preventing people from switching. F/OSS does not have this problem.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cheetah I post too much
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 2758
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| appalsap wrote: | | Proprietary software companies release software (and more importantly, drivers!!) in X-bit version only, preventing people from switching. F/OSS does not have this problem. |
64-bit drivers are pretty widespread now though, and the majority of 32-bit apps will run on a 64-bit OS.
Now if programmers would stop being lazy and actually start writing 64-bit and multi-threaded programs, we might get somewhere.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pseudo Xero I post too much
Reputation: 0
Joined: 16 Feb 2007 Posts: 2607
|
Posted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| lolwut94 wrote: | | fullyawesome wrote: | | i have no idea what you'd need 8gb of ram for... |
Running 3 Anti-viruses that are scanning a 2 terabyte hard drive at the same time while 7 Fullscreen games are minimized on high priority. |
None of that is a smart idea, no matter how much RAM you have.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
majick Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 08 Sep 2007 Posts: 112 Location: tennessee
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| lolwut94 wrote: | | fullyawesome wrote: | | i have no idea what you'd need 8gb of ram for... |
Running 3 Anti-viruses that are scanning a 2 terabyte hard drive at the same time while 7 Fullscreen games are minimized on high priority. |
LOL
Hmm are you sitting there with tin foin on your head looking out of you windows because the feds are watching you o.0
download.com use avg its free and gets the job done
and 64bit ..... thats like asking 16 or 32 ... duh
im sticking to the 32 till alot of bugs are worked out and currently working on learning lynix to do away with micr$oft operating $ystem
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
XDarkAnubisX Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 10 Aug 2007 Posts: 60 Location: somewhere o.O
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
32 bit its better and easier...XD
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte Site Admin
Reputation: 471
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 25815 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
32-bit apps will run faster on a 32-bit OS (64-bit os is slower for win32 apps because it has to continuesly switch from 32-bit mode to 64-bit kernelmode for each api call that requires something from the kernel. Like gdi)
the difference in speed can be quite noticable
also, if you're talking about Windows, 64-bit also takes away your freedom of choice on what to run on your computer. You can only run microsoft approved stuff. If microsoft doesn't want you to run it, you won't be running it
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
,,!,,(-.-),,!,, Expert Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 139 Location: Computer Talk (like every day all day)
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have a 64bit processor but i run 32bit windows.
_________________
________
People who aren't fags.
me (not me but the guy me)
TheLegacy
spedchyyz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kikin12 Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 31 Dec 2006 Posts: 495 Location: In My House
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so 32 is for normal people
and 64 is for gamers?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shady253 Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 12 Oct 2006 Posts: 318 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kikin12 wrote: | so 32 is for normal people
and 64 is for gamers? |
from what i understand,No. I think that 32 bit is just more user friendly and not as complicating when it comes down to software and computer parts. I think overall windows XP is for gamers,32-Bit or 64-Bit
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cheetah I post too much
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Nov 2007 Posts: 2758
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| kikin12 wrote: | so 32 is for normal people
and 64 is for gamers? |
No, 64-bit is just a newer architecture.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte Site Admin
Reputation: 471
Joined: 09 May 2003 Posts: 25815 Location: The netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
64-bit is more suitable for servers and specialized software.
it does allows a process to allocate memory than 2GB ram without having to bother yourself with calling api's to swap in and out a specific block of memory with the other one.
32-bit Pentiums can use 64GB of ram (when PAE is enabled) but to access that you'll have to use a specific api to map the upper 4GB+ ram, which causes a bit of overhead.
But for games, as long as they don't need more than 2GB and need it all at the same time, then there's no real need for 64-bit
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bannedjsin95 Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 0
Joined: 11 Oct 2007 Posts: 1499
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jst700 wrote: | | just go with the 32 bit its easier. |
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shady253 Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 12 Oct 2006 Posts: 318 Location: Connecticut
|
Posted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dark Byte wrote: | 64-bit is more suitable for servers and specialized software.
it does allows a process to allocate memory than 2GB ram without having to bother yourself with calling api's to swap in and out a specific block of memory with the other one.
32-bit Pentiums can use 64GB of ram (when PAE is enabled) but to access that you'll have to use a specific api to map the upper 4GB+ ram, which causes a bit of overhead.
But for games, as long as they don't need more than 2GB and need it all at the same time, then there's no real need for 64-bit |
Thank you very much for the information Dark Byte
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
linden Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 10 Mar 2006 Posts: 319
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
32bit, for M$ Windows, if you want any freedom.
Like DarkByte said, on 64bit, you can't freely run any program you want. M$ decides what will, and what won't run on your PC. You can't easily hack the kernel and run rootkits on your favor. If you're an individual, kernel driver development environment sucks! 'cause you can't even run a driver you wrote yourself. You can't have inline assembly in your C codes too, which is absurd
If you're concerned about cheating/hacking online games, INCA GameGuard or any other anti-cheat vendors wins the game. They are incorporated, they can sign their driver and get their hands into the kernel, but we can't. That already is a great disadvantage. In addition, they can buy special license from M$ to use special set of security related API's (which M$ promised) that are not open to the public!
64bit Windows sucks for game hackers, virus writers and rootkit programmers. And I want game hacks, unsigned drivers, rootkits, and even virus , on my PC, so I won't move to 64 bit until I find a way to have all these things on 64bit environment.
BTW, 32bit Vista sucks too, if you have any unsigned drivers running, it will refuse to play any high definition contents. Security sucks Don't be fooled by Vista's security features. When M$ talks about security, they are talking about security for contents and software industry, not security for individual end users! Sorry to go off topic.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
NuclearPowered Master Cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 30 Dec 2007 Posts: 345
|
Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
for now, 32bit is the way to go, I just bought 1 more gb of ram ontop of my 2gb ram,
32bit Vista and XP can theoratically handle 4gb ram but also some memory has to be preserved for the BIOS and stuff so it is cut down to 3gb RAM.
I already had 2x1gb ram and just bought 2x512mb ram to go in my 2 remaining slots to make up 3gb ram with 4 cards YAY!
In a year or 2, 64bit will be standard and all programs will be made for 64bit so don't worry.
Like you need more than 2gb ram nowadays...
Even Crysis only uses like 700mb
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|