Cheat Engine Forum Index Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Just One Message!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Random spam
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sir h4xalot
Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2016 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HackOtaku wrote:
sir h4xalot wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
>There were so many other inventions during this time as well

>The Oxford History of Technology sums it up as follows: "There are few major technological innovations between 500 A.D. and 1500 that do not show some traces of the Islamic culture."

your whole post: getaloadofthisguy.cam

>The very fact with this opening with "miracle of Arab science" tells me it's not an unbiased view of scientific contributions.
my face when the quote was a completely different source than the rest of the post. different source different view. herp. nice one guy

& pls dont even get me started on the greeks' plagiarism


The fact that you cant see the glaring error in your reasoning is the issue here. To you, if the Arabs build upon works previous to them, then it become their contribution, but if anything is built off things the Arabs made, then it's still their contribution. This ridiculous ideology, which I have already pointed out, is the reason I can no longer take you seriously. If you want to think that way, fine, but it's faulty logic imo.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_analogy#False_analogy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullshit


dam son ur face looks like bull's shit lol
#gotem
That is pretty good, you should write for SNL.


I fucked your mother on Saturday night, live.
bitch.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13

Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81

Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13

Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 11:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


when i quoted you with a url i was asserting your quote was what the url described
you quoted me with a url
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

so pls dont try to tell me what my logic is. you're fingerpointing and accusing inadequacy because this is your choice of projection. i remember learning in english grade school that the author and the reader have two distinct interpretations so pls dont try to author my shit for me when its already been signed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sir h4xalot
Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


Your mother sucked every dick in town.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
Reputation: 130

Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


when i quoted you with a url i was asserting your quote was what the url described
you quoted me with a url
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

so pls dont try to tell me what my logic is. you're fingerpointing and accusing inadequacy because this is your choice of projection. i remember learning in english grade school that the author and the reader have two distinct interpretations so pls dont try to author my shit for me when its already been signed
What the fuck? That's assuming he agrees with you and he clearly fucking doesn't. How can you think that he's saying what he's saying is bullshit? He's saying what YOU said is bullshit, as in the things you linked don't actually apply and you're talking complete and utter crap. How can you tell anyone they can't comprehend English with this display of retardation hahahahhaha
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sir h4xalot
Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

konr wrote:
greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


when i quoted you with a url i was asserting your quote was what the url described
you quoted me with a url
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

so pls dont try to tell me what my logic is. you're fingerpointing and accusing inadequacy because this is your choice of projection. i remember learning in english grade school that the author and the reader have two distinct interpretations so pls dont try to author my shit for me when its already been signed
What the fuck? That's assuming he agrees with you and he clearly fucking doesn't. How can you think that he's saying what he's saying is bullshit? He's saying what YOU said is bullshit, as in the things you linked don't actually apply and you're talking complete and utter crap. How can you tell anyone they can't comprehend English with this display of retardation hahahahhaha


>hahahahhaha
>hahahahh
>hahh
>hh
>your dum
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13

Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

konr wrote:
greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


when i quoted you with a url i was asserting your quote was what the url described
you quoted me with a url
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

so pls dont try to tell me what my logic is. you're fingerpointing and accusing inadequacy because this is your choice of projection. i remember learning in english grade school that the author and the reader have two distinct interpretations so pls dont try to author my shit for me when its already been signed
What the fuck? That's assuming he agrees with you and he clearly fucking doesn't. How can you think that he's saying what he's saying is bullshit? He's saying what YOU said is bullshit, as in the things you linked don't actually apply and you're talking complete and utter crap. How can you tell anyone they can't comprehend English with this display of retardation hahahahhaha


you're right, with this display of retardation you have rendered yourself immobile; you find English incomprehensible: of course it's impossible to convey clearly to you. thus your expected, intuitive, immediate, and most frequent baffled ejaculate, "What the fuck?"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sir h4xalot
Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

greatsage wrote:
konr wrote:
greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


when i quoted you with a url i was asserting your quote was what the url described
you quoted me with a url
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

so pls dont try to tell me what my logic is. you're fingerpointing and accusing inadequacy because this is your choice of projection. i remember learning in english grade school that the author and the reader have two distinct interpretations so pls dont try to author my shit for me when its already been signed
What the fuck? That's assuming he agrees with you and he clearly fucking doesn't. How can you think that he's saying what he's saying is bullshit? He's saying what YOU said is bullshit, as in the things you linked don't actually apply and you're talking complete and utter crap. How can you tell anyone they can't comprehend English with this display of retardation hahahahhaha


you're right, with this display of retardation you have rendered yourself immobile; you find English incomprehensible: of course it's impossible to convey clearly to you. thus your expected, intuitive, immediate, and most frequent baffled ejaculate, "What the fuck?"


>/r/iamverysmart
faggot your mother sucks dick and bunions in hell
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81

Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 3:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


when i quoted you with a url i was asserting your quote was what the url described
you quoted me with a url
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

so pls dont try to tell me what my logic is. you're fingerpointing and accusing inadequacy because this is your choice of projection. i remember learning in english grade school that the author and the reader have two distinct interpretations so pls dont try to author my shit for me when its already been signed


So, just so I am following your logic:

>I make a statement, which I will equate to numbers as being 1, or positive, or a thing I believe to be true.
>You post a URL to my quote as a means to assert that you believe the above statements are whatever wiki page that has been linked, setting the precedent of doing so. You link false analogy and strawmen as a way to say you disagree with the statement, the -1, negative, or something you believe to be false.

At this point, you've attempted to invalidate my statement by accusing it of being false. Simple enough to equate it as -1.

>I post a link to "Bullshit" as a means of saying your statement, in which you accuse fallacies, is bullshit. This is me countering your -1 with a -1 of my own. Which gives us 1 * -1 * -1 which equates to 1, or true again. This is me following the precedent you set of linking wiki URLs, so there's no way you should believe I was talking about my original point, but instead your own links. (which you seem to have understood, but somehow you got fucked up.)

In other terms, you gave a statement of invalidation against my statement, and I gave a statement of invalidation towards your invalidation, which in turns, revalidates my original claim. By your logic, if someone says something, someone disagrees, and then that person disagrees with whoever is disagreeing, somehow to original person now disagrees with their own point? 1 * -1 * -1 = -1?

When you first posted that, I was convinced you were just being typical talix and being childish"Hur durr, he admitted his own stuff is bullshit because he said bullshit!", but the fact that you're actually trying to defend your logic is a joke. There's no fucking way you can read that context in such a way that it seems like I am saying my own points are bullshit. It's intentional ignorance, you have to be feigning stupidity.

Explain to me your logic of :

Quote:
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

If your URL is trying to discredit me, and I accuse it of being false, how does that equate to me saying what I originally posted was bullshit?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sir h4xalot
Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
HackOtaku wrote:
greatsage wrote:
at least he admitted he was spewing bullshit.

only a derp would think that the most influential society isn't the one that had the most powerful words in the history of mankind handed down unto them & holds the holiest & most influential city in the world.
By that logic, you've admitted to false analogy and strawmen. Like, are you actually this stupid?


when i quoted you with a url i was asserting your quote was what the url described
you quoted me with a url
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

so pls dont try to tell me what my logic is. you're fingerpointing and accusing inadequacy because this is your choice of projection. i remember learning in english grade school that the author and the reader have two distinct interpretations so pls dont try to author my shit for me when its already been signed


So, just so I am following your logic:

>I make a statement, which I will equate to numbers as being 1, or positive, or a thing I believe to be true.
>You post a URL to my quote as a means to assert that you believe the above statements are whatever wiki page that has been linked, setting the precedent of doing so. You link false analogy and strawmen as a way to say you disagree with the statement, the -1, negative, or something you believe to be false.

At this point, you've attempted to invalidate my statement by accusing it of being false. Simple enough to equate it as -1.

>I post a link to "Bullshit" as a means of saying your statement, in which you accuse fallacies, is bullshit. This is me countering your -1 with a -1 of my own. Which gives us 1 * -1 * -1 which equates to 1, or true again. This is me following the precedent you set of linking wiki URLs, so there's no way you should believe I was talking about my original point, but instead your own links. (which you seem to have understood, but somehow you got fucked up.)

In other terms, you gave a statement of invalidation against my statement, and I gave a statement of invalidation towards your invalidation, which in turns, revalidates my original claim. By your logic, if someone says something, someone disagrees, and then that person disagrees with whoever is disagreeing, somehow to original person now disagrees with their own point? 1 * -1 * -1 = -1?

When you first posted that, I was convinced you were just being typical talix and being childish"Hur durr, he admitted his own stuff is bullshit because he said bullshit!", but the fact that you're actually trying to defend your logic is a joke. There's no fucking way you can read that context in such a way that it seems like I am saying my own points are bullshit. It's intentional ignorance, you have to be feigning stupidity.

Explain to me your logic of :

Quote:
if you were describing the url i posted, with your url, as bullshit
then you are describing what you originally posted, what i quoted, as, in your own words, bullshit

If your URL is trying to discredit me, and I accuse it of being false, how does that equate to me saying what I originally posted was bullshit?


You should swallow some rat poison. Go buy some, and sprinkle it in your cheerios.

YA CUCK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81

Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am sorry your life is so fucked up sir h4x. Best wishes on it getting better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sir h4xalot
Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1

Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 129

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

HackOtaku wrote:
I am sorry your life is so fucked up sir h4x. Best wishes on it getting better.


oi thanks m8
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13

Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"accusing" key word. another strawman, hypocrite.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81

Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

greatsage wrote:
"accusing" key word. another strawman, hypocrite.
You're an idiot, I'm done with you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Cheat Engine Forum Index -> Random spam All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 8 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

CE Wiki   IRC (#CEF)   Twitter
Third party websites