View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
MH00 Newbie cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Jul 2024 Posts: 10 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Thu Dec 19, 2024 10:38 am Post subject: How to find new value when there is large number before |
|
|
I have been trying for months to find a counter and have not got close to find the counter.
I do a first scan for the value (in my case the value is 0) before I start the program and get 48 million and then I start the program and get some more addresses with that value.
So is there anyway I can do something like a first scan for the value and only keep the addresses that are new with that value and discard all addresses with that value from the old first scan??
Also - is there someone I could call -maybe in the USA - and talk to about tips or suggestions how to find this counter?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Xx XoTiC V1 xX Advanced Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 03 Aug 2012 Posts: 56
|
Posted: Fri Dec 20, 2024 12:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
If it's changing you're not gonna find it doing that, honestly I'm not even sure what you're trying to do or what you're referring to as "counter".
Your last bit it just sounds like you'd be going in circles, & how do you know your value is zero? It might say zero however it doesn't mean it always is. If the data is changing when you start the program or anytime during running it which is a biiiig possibility you're definitely just going in circles man.
I'll take it you're new to the memory editing scene, hey we all were at one point. It's very confusing in the beginning what to do, stuff gets more & more advanced as well. You're trying to accomplish something that sounds a bit complicated for you right now & based on this post I'm not even sure is possible with the method you're using. Doesn't sound like it. Might need to try something different but I'd personally focus on learning more about memory first.
If it's static & never changes still gonna be hard to find. & looking at your past posts it seems you're trying to learn scripting which is good. That will be needed for those changing addresses unless you can find a pointer in the memory already. In which case no scripting needed.
_________________
Learning as I go. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
MH00 Newbie cheater
Reputation: 0
Joined: 29 Jul 2024 Posts: 10 Location: Ohio
|
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2025 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I attach CE to a PID
Do a first scan for value and get millions in addr list for that value
Start the program
Do a first scan again for that value and get some more added to the addr list (this is where I would like to get addr list of only the new values and discard the old addr with that value)
I do an action in the program and then scan for value increased by one. There are many addr that the value increases by one like an index in a FOR loop or DO loop so that is why I call it a "counter".
I repeat this a few times but the program after a few actions seems to alloc new memory, copy data to new location and dealloc the memory I was scanning.
So now I must start over with new first scan for that value and another scan after each action.
I also believe there is a timer - some times while looking at memory the values shown change to "??" like the program has a timer and alloc new memory, copy data to new location and dealloc the old memory.
Both of this things make it hard for me to find this counter and I can not seem to get close to locating the counter.
How can I put in a request to the CE programming team to add an option/enhancement to CE to do something like a first scan but delete any addr with the same value in the current scan and only keep new addr with the value?
Hopefully this will get rid of the millions in the addr list when I start the program.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Autem Expert Cheater
Reputation: 1
Joined: 30 Jan 2023 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Fri Jun 13, 2025 2:04 pm Post subject: Re: How to find new value when there is large number before |
|
|
MH00 wrote: | So is there anyway I can do something like a first scan for the value and only keep the addresses that are new with that value and discard all addresses with that value from the old first scan?? |
I'm not sure if I fully understand, but CE has a "not" box you can check over to the right of the scan settings. I think maybe what you can do is check that "not" box for the first scan where you want all the addresses without said value. Then do whatever actions you think will bring that value into play, UNCHECK the "not" box and re-scan for that value. Be warned the first scans may take a LONG time though.
Also you mentioned later about increasing by 1, but it may be better to just do "increased value" without specifying how much. The internal value may not be incrementing by 1 the way you think.
MH00 wrote: | Also - is there someone I could call -maybe in the USA - and talk to about tips or suggestions how to find this counter? |
I have had success helping a lot of people in the past over Discord, but I'm not sure if we should be sharing Discord usernames here. If you want, you can send me a private message here on the forums and give me your Discord username.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|