 |
Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
themandem
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Dec 2019
Posts: 35
|
 Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2023 11:14 pm Post subject: hack works fine in CE but behaves incorrectly in C++ |
 |
|
this comparison at offset 0x440 is what i'm using for a godmode + one hit kill cheat. both godmode and one hit kill work just fine in cheat engine when i create a script. but in visual studio when i make a DLL and inject, the code behavior is incorrect. i cannot for the life of me figure out why its doing that.
| Code: | cmp dword ptr [eax+ecx+0x440], 0 ;// isPlayer check
je godmode
cmp byte ptr [ohk_flag], 1
je ohk
jmp code
|
i debugged the code and when i inject the DLL and activate the cheat, the comparison never even goes past 'je godmode'. I can't post pictures here but, at offset 0x440, the value 0 is for player chars, and the 49152 is for enemy (4 byte). like i said, the godmode + one hit kill works fine when i create script in cheat engine, but for some reason when i make it in a DLL in visual studio, and activate it, it sees both player and enemy values at offset 0x440 as zero. 😵💫 thus applying godmode to everyone even enemies, and causing one hit kill to not work at all.
in visual studio, i am not strictly using C++ ... i'm using the inline assembly, which works fine for x86 games which my game is. let me know if anyone got ideas, i'll post my code:
| Code: | bool godmode_flag{0};
bool ohk_flag{0};
DWORD JumpBack0{}; |
| Code: | _declspec(naked) void TestHookCode0() ;// Godmode and One Hit Kill
{
__asm
{
newmem:
cmp dword ptr[eax + ecx + 0x440], 0 ;// isPlayer check
je godmode
cmp byte ptr [ohk_flag], 1
je ohk
jmp code
godmode:
cmp byte ptr [godmode_flag], 0
je code
mov bx, 999
mov[eax + ecx], bx
lea ecx, [edi + 04]
jmp[JumpBack0]
ohk:
mov[eax + ecx], 0
lea ecx, [edi + 04]
jmp[JumpBack0]
code:
mov[eax + ecx], bl
lea ecx, [edi + 04]
jmp[JumpBack0]
}
} |
the 'cmp' part is the problem. before you say the comparison is incorrect and to find a different value/offset, i just wanna reiterate, the comparison works fine when i create a script with identical code in cheat engine. only in visual studio, its behaving incorrectly...
Last edited by themandem on Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dark Byte
Site Admin
 Reputation: 452
Joined: 09 May 2003
Posts: 25008
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2023 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
you're sure that the detour code to your function doesn't mangle eax?
_________________
Do not ask me about online cheats. I don't know any and wont help finding them.
Like my help? Join me on Patreon so i can keep helping |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
themandem
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 0
Joined: 06 Dec 2019
Posts: 35
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 04, 2023 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Dark Byte wrote: | | you're sure that the detour code to your function doesn't mangle eax? |
i don't think so. i was debugging in CE and MSVS earlier and checked eax behaviour (like the value in eax) from both my cheat engine script and the DLL. eax behaved the same way after i stepped over the cmp dword ptr[eax + ecx + 0x440], 0 line for both hacks.
setting breakpoint on hook, value in eax is 0x3. after i step over the line cmp dword ptr[eax + ecx + 0x440], 0
eax value is still 0x3.
edit: not sure how to fix name mangling but i tried this, however it's still behaving incorrect
| Code: | push eax
cmp dword ptr[eax + ecx + 0x440], 0 ;// isPlayer check
pop eax
je godmode
|
edit 2: fixed i guess? I found an alternate comparison. still if anyone knows the solution to my initial problem, i'd like to dig deeper and find out why the old cmp wasn't working
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TsTg
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 5
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 332
Location: Somewhere....
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2023 7:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
-not just eax that is the problem, your address relies on the ecx register as well.
-you have to specify the values of the registers exactly as the game does, if that fuction changes one of them by the point you are executing the cmp instruction, then your address is already mangled.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
