 |
Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Antagonist
Cheater
 Reputation: 29
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 48
Location: California
|
 Posted: Sat Nov 12, 2016 11:53 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Agree with second video. Regulations on business makes businesses scared to hire people. Its hurting many students in college. Not even talking about small businesses either but big companies too. Its not like it used to be where it is actually possible to get your foot in the door as a fucking janitor and work your way up to be a chief executive. But with regulations it's harder for poor people to achieve the american dream. Its fucked up.
_________________
  
| tough guy talix wrote: | | i've had it with your shit. fuck outta here |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
teeigeryuh
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 261
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:00 am Post subject: Re: Every Canadian is retarded |
|
|
For every video out there titled "X POLITICIAN DESTROYS B" there's another one proving the opposite, there's a shitton of videos that can counter argument what you said or videos claiming that trump is infact hitler, I'm not saying one is better than the other lol, just that there's just as many reasons for being sad/happy with either candidate, if think you know something and can't find any cons to it, then you really don't know shit
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antagonist
Cheater
Reputation: 29
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 48
Location: California
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 3:04 am Post subject: |
 |
|
dude aren't u like officially mentally deficient y r u pretending like u know anything when u know ur actually retarded. Like ur replies bring 0 value to the discussion. Ur like the one guy in the group that wants to say something even though everyone thinks ur retarded but u say it anyways bcus u want to put on ur big boy pants so u just echo mainstream sound bites thinking there's conversational value to what you just said and I'm the guy that says out loud "shut the fuck up Steve, ur dumb as dirt. ur only hanging out with us bc ur sister is hot as shit and I'm fucking her"
_________________
| tough guy talix wrote: | | i've had it with your shit. fuck outta here |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
br0l0ck
Cheater
![]() Reputation: 63
Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 38
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 4:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| if he could in fact find counter arguments or claims that substantial then he should be getting paid real big $$$ for that shit, ive heard finding holes in logic and speeches makes you bank
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh
Master Cheater
Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 261
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 5:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Antagonist wrote: | | dude aren't u like officially mentally deficient y r u pretending like u know anything when u know ur actually retarded. Like ur replies bring 0 value to the discussion. Ur like the one guy in the group that wants to say something even though everyone thinks ur retarded but u say it anyways bcus u want to put on ur big boy pants so u just echo mainstream sound bites thinking there's conversational value to what you just said and I'm the guy that says out loud "shut the fuck up Steve, ur dumb as dirt. ur only hanging out with us bc ur sister is hot as shit and I'm fucking her" |
ok?
| Quote: | | if he could in fact find counter arguments or claims that substantial then he should be getting paid real big $$$ for that shit, ive heard finding holes in logic and speeches makes you bank |
the fuck are you talking about, finding the whole isn't what counts but portraying it, a great example would be antagonist's posts, he's not arguing or having a discussion, it's always insults or trying to challenge one using well portrayed fallacies, yet in his mind and maybe other people he is correct and logic was not needed to convince him or others (assuming being convinced was something he wanted or was needed), yet on the other side, one or two people might agree on a point i might make when replying to him
logic isn't necessarily needed in anyone's life to make decisions, we mostly disregard to make decisions that makes us feel better, if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree, if you do the same with people who like what they see, they will just feel great and reassured, people never focus on processing the new info and just focus on feeling right, we all do it and cannot function without it, it's part of one's nature
that's what the media focuses on and that's what bothers me from this, so much shit of what you see on tv and agree/disagree with is just a lie, Hilary was corrupt, it's been proven, trump cheated people out of money, it's been proved, when either of them was challenged regarding their faults the simply avoided it, or ignored it, both candidates did contradict themselves numerous times, it's logical that neither candidate is going for presidency because they want to help you country, but because of self interest
gannok has provided multiple youtube videos as well with people pointing out how trump's logic is wrong, yet all of that is being disregarded
tl;dr doubt that you could make money just because you could find a hole if the people who (IMO) seem to be profiting from it are the ones that portray distorted logic, voting because you believe what tv says to you is for stupid people, and all of you believing you are right and did something for your country and all that ego shit, are fucking sheep lol, why would you want to live as a sheep
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antagonist
Cheater
Reputation: 29
Joined: 24 Nov 2009
Posts: 48
Location: California
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lol dude did u just turn 13? Yeah of course there's always a counter argument in everything. There's pros and cons in being a communist. And nobody cares about logic becauae at the end of the day nobody knows what theyre doing. Its practicing the most efficient and effective ideology. And the person that could make the most resonating argument in why their ideology is better wins. Its not about being right or wrong. Nobody fucking knows what's the right or wrong way to do things. Nobody has a crystal ball. You can only practice whats worked in the past. People only argue for what's better. In this election Trump is better than Clinton. And you're saying oh yeah theres a different side to the argument you can find it on the internet. Ur trying to argue for the perfect ideology or the perfect candidate. I bet u that all your heroes and people you admire besides anime characters want to nutt on a hot bitchs face with an ass of a high school volley ball team captain. Nigga sit ur ass down l0l like what point are u even trying to make. That were all fucked because Trump is the winner and the people that competed against him are losers? Grow a pair of balls kiddo. The only person that's fucked is u. When you have to rely on decisions of others like who's in office so that u can do well for yourself. Who the fuck cares if Trump cheated off of a few people when he's made tens of thousands of other lives better. Better yet, I'd rather have a cheat than a fucker who sold out Americans for personal enrichment.
_________________
| tough guy talix wrote: | | i've had it with your shit. fuck outta here |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
 Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh
Master Cheater
Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 261
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century |
how is this a blanket statement?
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century |
how is this a blanket statement? |
because this doesnt apply to everyone?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh
Master Cheater
Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 261
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century |
how is this a blanket statement? |
because this doesnt apply to everyone? |
omg, so anger does not come from situations where your principles/self is violated? who doesn't this apply to? if there are people weird enough to not get angry, do people like this come in a relevant quantity that could displace the argument, or are you going to nitpick because I made a generalization, you sure as hell avoided the rest of the post
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century |
how is this a blanket statement? |
because this doesnt apply to everyone? |
omg, so anger does not come from situations where your principles/self is violated? who doesn't this apply to? if there are people weird enough to not get angry, do people like this come in a relevant quantity that could displace the argument, or are you going to nitpick because I made a generalization, you sure as hell avoided the rest of the post |
not for mentally healthy individuals no, anger is not the first response
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh
Master Cheater
Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 261
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century |
how is this a blanket statement? |
because this doesnt apply to everyone? |
omg, so anger does not come from situations where your principles/self is violated? who doesn't this apply to? if there are people weird enough to not get angry, do people like this come in a relevant quantity that could displace the argument, or are you going to nitpick because I made a generalization, you sure as hell avoided the rest of the post |
not for mentally healthy individuals no, anger is not the first response |
so you're saying mentally healthy people do not get angry as a first choice? so you see an advertisement calling you a complete idiot, what do you feel then? yeah only mentally ill people get angry
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cokefag
Master Cheater
Reputation: 51
Joined: 15 Nov 2007
Posts: 488
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century |
how is this a blanket statement? |
because this doesnt apply to everyone? |
omg, so anger does not come from situations where your principles/self is violated? who doesn't this apply to? if there are people weird enough to not get angry, do people like this come in a relevant quantity that could displace the argument, or are you going to nitpick because I made a generalization, you sure as hell avoided the rest of the post |
not for mentally healthy individuals no, anger is not the first response |
so you're saying mentally healthy people do not get angry as a first choice? so you see an advertisement calling you a complete idiot, what do you feel then? yeah only mentally ill people get angry |
being called a complete idiot is not the same thing as being shown 100% accurate/testable information
being called a complete idiot would be being called a complete idiot
if you feel that someone calls you a complete idiot implicitly from being shown 100% accurate/testable information then you are insecure and projecting your insecurities
aka you are not the most mentally healthy person out there
edit: even in that scenario, anger should not be the first response elicited by most people, i'd say that only places with a culture of honour would elicit anger as a first response to being called an idiot, but that's the southern states and you were making a blanket statement
edit2: also, i never read your full post because that would be a waste of time
Last edited by cokefag on Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:17 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AverageAzn247
Grandmaster Cheater
 Reputation: 34
Joined: 01 Oct 2007
Posts: 909
Location: Austin,TX with 72 virgins
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i think its pretty funny how some hilary supporters are trying to justify rigging an election because they lost. Electoral college has been around since the constitution and changing after you lost because you dont like the outcome is plain childish.
_________________
| Waxxup wrote: | What are Night Elves?
A girl group? |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
teeigeryuh
Master Cheater
Reputation: 23
Joined: 13 Oct 2008
Posts: 261
Location: The netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | cokefag wrote: | | teeigeryuh wrote: | | if you were to show 100% accurate/testable new information to someone, and this information happens to conflict with their principles, they will get angry and avoid you if they don't agree |
blanket statement of the century |
how is this a blanket statement? |
because this doesnt apply to everyone? |
omg, so anger does not come from situations where your principles/self is violated? who doesn't this apply to? if there are people weird enough to not get angry, do people like this come in a relevant quantity that could displace the argument, or are you going to nitpick because I made a generalization, you sure as hell avoided the rest of the post |
not for mentally healthy individuals no, anger is not the first response |
so you're saying mentally healthy people do not get angry as a first choice? so you see an advertisement calling you a complete idiot, what do you feel then? yeah only mentally ill people get angry |
being called a complete idiot is not the same thing as being shown 100% accurate/testable information
being called a complete idiot would be being called a complete idiot
if you feel that someone calls you a complete idiot implicitly from being shown 100% accurate/testable information then you are insecure and projecting your insecurities
aka you are not the most mentally healthy person out there
edit: even in that scenario, anger should not be the first response elicited by most people, i'd say that only places with a culture of honour would elicit anger as a first response to being called an idiot, but that's the southern states and you were making a blanket statement
edit2: also, i never read your full post because that would be a waste of time |
> also, i never read your full post because that would be a waste of time
nice blanket
>being called an idiot is not the same as proving you're an idiot
nobody said it wasn't
>i'd say that only places with a culture of honour would elicit anger as a first response to being called an idiot
so if you call a random afro american humans just idiots on the street and tell me you don't get beat up
>if you feel that someone calls you a complete idiot implicitly from being shown 100% accurate/testable information then you are insecure and projecting your insecurities
idk how getting hurt = "projecting", I projecting was just transferring your insecurities to others, also, everyone has insecurities, are you saying you don't?
also, what i said earlier does apply to everyone, if someone calls you stupid just like that then getting angry is retarded, if someone calls you stupid in front of your wife or simply violates a principle with facts one can relate to on the spot, then said person will get angry
im just here to philosophize LOL
_________________
ლ(╹◡╹ლ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
