 |
Cheat Engine
The Official Site of Cheat Engine
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
 Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228
|
 Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:34 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
 Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 130
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
??????????????????????????????????????
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 7:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
Now you must be trolling. Seriously, look at your logic. You can't honestly expect me to believe you think it's needed to add "the" troll in order for him to not believe sir hax is a troll? That's literally retarded, like, I feel like you can only be trolling at this point.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? If you do, then you agree that Kyle's statement implies that he is not a troll, if you disagree, explain to me why that statement doesn't imply what I believe it does.
| -_- wrote: |
Great essay bro. 10/10 |
Thanks man, it's pretty good, ig.
Last edited by HackOtaku on Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 130
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
Now you must be trolling. Seriously, look at your logic. You can't honestly expect me to believe you think it's needed to add "the" troll in order for him to not believe sir hax is a troll? That's literally retarded, like, I feel like you can only be trolling at this point.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? If you do, then you agree that Kyle's statement implies that he is not a troll, if you disagree, explain to me why that statement doesn't imply what I believe it does. |
At least he responds with actual substance instead of just saying "no I'm right and you're wrong, strawmans everywhere ignorance shown once more xd". OH WAIT ROFL
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Channel GannoK
pffrt
 Reputation: 130
Joined: 12 Apr 2008
Posts: 608
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Talix is a retard who tries to over analyze language when there is nothing that needs to be analyzed. It's pretty straight forward.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sir h4xalot
Expert Cheater
 Reputation: 1
Joined: 25 May 2007
Posts: 129
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 04, 2016 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Channel GannoK wrote: | Trump policies = reactionary retard baby shit. It means don't know how to interact with things and people you don't know or want to understand. BUILD A WALL, KEEP OUT THE MUSLIMS. INDIANS HAVE SOME LEGITIMATE GRIEVANCES? FORGET ABOUT EM, FUCK EM. MORE OIL, MORE TERRIBLE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS AND DIPLOMACY. MORE WAR PLZ.
That's literally you, and you embrace it fully. |
As a vet, war keeps employment open for me.
Kek.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 5:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
Now you must be trolling. Seriously, look at your logic. You can't honestly expect me to believe you think it's needed to add "the" troll in order for him to not believe sir hax is a troll? That's literally retarded, like, I feel like you can only be trolling at this point.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? If you do, then you agree that Kyle's statement implies that he is not a troll, if you disagree, explain to me why that statement doesn't imply what I believe it does.
| -_- wrote: |
Great essay bro. 10/10 |
Thanks man, it's pretty good, ig. |
i have, the only thing you are showing is your ineptitude.
and again you argue only against a strawman, no where do you actually argue against me. nothing of substance. lol
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
Now you must be trolling. Seriously, look at your logic. You can't honestly expect me to believe you think it's needed to add "the" troll in order for him to not believe sir hax is a troll? That's literally retarded, like, I feel like you can only be trolling at this point.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? If you do, then you agree that Kyle's statement implies that he is not a troll, if you disagree, explain to me why that statement doesn't imply what I believe it does.
| -_- wrote: |
Great essay bro. 10/10 |
Thanks man, it's pretty good, ig. |
i have, the only thing you are showing is your ineptitude.
and again you argue only against a strawman, no where do you actually argue against me. nothing of substance. lol |
Great, substantial arguement. Is this your definition of "substance" and a "legitimate rebuttal"? No wonder you are having such a hard time with words. The reason you arent addressing the valid points I've made is because you know you are wrong and you are copping out to protect your fragile ego.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
Now you must be trolling. Seriously, look at your logic. You can't honestly expect me to believe you think it's needed to add "the" troll in order for him to not believe sir hax is a troll? That's literally retarded, like, I feel like you can only be trolling at this point.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? If you do, then you agree that Kyle's statement implies that he is not a troll, if you disagree, explain to me why that statement doesn't imply what I believe it does.
| -_- wrote: |
Great essay bro. 10/10 |
Thanks man, it's pretty good, ig. |
i have, the only thing you are showing is your ineptitude.
and again you argue only against a strawman, no where do you actually argue against me. nothing of substance. lol |
Great, substantial arguement. Is this your definition of "substance" and a "legitimate rebuttal"? No wonder you are having such a hard time with words. The reason you arent addressing the valid points I've made is because you know you are wrong and you are copping out to protect your fragile ego. |
lol this argument is the equivalent of getting pissed off when deleting a BLOPS 3 game shortcut doesn't clear but ~KB of data instead of GBs.
no cop outs at all. you are copping out with the only argument you have being words put in my mouth, and never actually against my words
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
| greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
Now you must be trolling. Seriously, look at your logic. You can't honestly expect me to believe you think it's needed to add "the" troll in order for him to not believe sir hax is a troll? That's literally retarded, like, I feel like you can only be trolling at this point.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? If you do, then you agree that Kyle's statement implies that he is not a troll, if you disagree, explain to me why that statement doesn't imply what I believe it does.
| -_- wrote: |
Great essay bro. 10/10 |
Thanks man, it's pretty good, ig. |
i have, the only thing you are showing is your ineptitude.
and again you argue only against a strawman, no where do you actually argue against me. nothing of substance. lol |
Great, substantial arguement. Is this your definition of "substance" and a "legitimate rebuttal"? No wonder you are having such a hard time with words. The reason you arent addressing the valid points I've made is because you know you are wrong and you are copping out to protect your fragile ego. |
lol this argument is the equivalent of getting pissed off when deleting a BLOPS 3 game shortcut doesn't clear but ~KB of data instead of GBs.
no cop outs at all. you are copping out with the only argument you have being words put in my mouth, and never actually against my words |
Still not addressing the point, still dancing around the topic.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | greatsage wrote: | filled with strawmen, not gonna cover them because it'd be too tedious; you fail at basic comprehension. if you noticed, i used the same words as you and you disagreed with them, that is why i was using "??"
again, the way it is written;
there is no clear disagreement that states he is not a troll. the sentence can be perfectly used to describe as i stated; and Kyle also may have been unwilling to concretely conclude whether or not he was or was not a troll: all that was apparent was that he was /just/ a mouth breather; the only way to change the wording to say "not a troll" without directly saying that, is to imply that i am /the/ troll. thus there is only one. but when you say "a", it can be multiple. that is what "the" is for; a definitive article: which his post is obviously lacking. lol |
Holy fuck, I don't honestly believe you are this stupid. |
at least i can offer anything of substance or legitimate rebuttals. you never actually argue against me. lol |
Now you must be trolling. Seriously, look at your logic. You can't honestly expect me to believe you think it's needed to add "the" troll in order for him to not believe sir hax is a troll? That's literally retarded, like, I feel like you can only be trolling at this point.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? If you do, then you agree that Kyle's statement implies that he is not a troll, if you disagree, explain to me why that statement doesn't imply what I believe it does.
| -_- wrote: |
Great essay bro. 10/10 |
Thanks man, it's pretty good, ig. |
i have, the only thing you are showing is your ineptitude.
and again you argue only against a strawman, no where do you actually argue against me. nothing of substance. lol |
Great, substantial arguement. Is this your definition of "substance" and a "legitimate rebuttal"? No wonder you are having such a hard time with words. The reason you arent addressing the valid points I've made is because you know you are wrong and you are copping out to protect your fragile ego. |
lol this argument is the equivalent of getting pissed off when deleting a BLOPS 3 game shortcut doesn't clear but ~KB of data instead of GBs.
no cop outs at all. you are copping out with the only argument you have being words put in my mouth, and never actually against my words |
Still not addressing the point, still dancing around the topic.
The statement "He's a chef, his friend is just a carrot cutter" implies that his friend is not a chef. Do you agree with this statement? |
yes, what you are doing is exactly that. this is completely irrelevant, it is dancing around the topic, and it is at best a false analogy. good job
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HackOtaku
I posted the 500000th topic
Reputation: 81
Joined: 31 May 2007
Posts: 228
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ??????? These two setences are analogous, way more than your examples. Yes or no, that sentence implies his friend is not a chef?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
finnegan waking up
How do I cheat?
Reputation: 13
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 0
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| HackOtaku wrote: | | ??????? These two setences are analogous, way more than your examples. Yes or no, that sentence implies his friend is not a chef? |
those weren't my examples, they were the dictionary's
so you aren't actually arguing against me, you're just being a hypocrite. gl
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
1929394839292057839194958
Grandmaster Cheater Supreme
![]() Reputation: 130
Joined: 22 Dec 2006
Posts: 1509
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2016 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| greatsage wrote: | | HackOtaku wrote: | | ??????? These two setences are analogous, way more than your examples. Yes or no, that sentence implies his friend is not a chef? |
those weren't my examples, they were the dictionary's
so you aren't actually arguing against me, you're just being a hypocrite. gl |
No he's definitely arguing against you, because you are using the dictionary examples to try to make a point that just isn't quite landing because you are a fucking spastic that can't read.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
